dslreports logo
site
spacer

spacer
 
    Intro FAQ Speed Tests Line Quality Smoke Ping Tweak Test Line Monitor Monitor Groups »»
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


« Back to speed test statistics

Enter ZIP or Postal Code (partial ok): to search domain bhn.net
Expand see the distribution of results (graph)

domain bhn.net


Ordered by descending tested download speed
Note: no more than the three best results from the same IP, or user, are included
Speed
Dwn/up
Claimed
ISP & Speed
User
Location
TestDay
Hour
(EST)
Company &
Domain
60.8m/8.8m   INSPIRON3847 See Profile @ Bakersfield, CA, USA(flash speedtest)6th 08:45 AM
bhn.net
Comment:Bright House Networks
59.9m/10.2m   INSPIRON3847 See Profile @ Bakersfield, CA, USA(flash speedtest)29th 10:01 AM
bhn.net
Comment:Bright House Networks
58m/3.1m   INSPIRON3847 See Profile @ Bakersfield, CA, USA(flash speedtest)5th 09:50 PM
bhn.net
Comment:Bright House Networks
51.3m/902   anon @ New Smyrna Beach, FL, USAMichigan, USA2nd 05:23 PM
res.bhn.net
41.1m/5.4m  75/5 Samwise75 See Profile @ Orlando, FL, USAMichigan, USA16th 03:14 PM
res.bhn.net
Comment:Cleaned up noise on the cable.
39.3m/2.3m   anonMichigan, USA12th 09:11 PM
res.bhn.net
39.2m/2.3m   baracudda See Profile @ Port Orange, FL, USAMichigan, USA20th 11:20 AM
res.bhn.net
35.9m/2.2m   baracudda See Profile @ Port Orange, FL, USAMichigan, USA15th 10:44 AM
res.bhn.net
35.8m/2.3m   baracudda See Profile @ Port Orange, FL, USAMichigan, USA15th 10:23 AM
res.bhn.net
32.8m/4.1m   anon @ Bunnell, FL, USAMichigan, USA5th 08:32 PM
res.bhn.net
26.1m/11.1m   anon @ Lakeland, FL, USAMichigan, USA12th 05:06 PM
res.bhn.net
16.7m/1.1m  15/- anon @ Groveland, FL, USAMichigan, USA25th 10:27 PM
res.bhn.net
13.9m/2.2m   anon @ Melbourne, FL, USAMichigan, USA29th 04:09 PM
res.bhn.net
10.9m/6.7m   anon @ Orlando, FL, USA(flash speedtest)13th 12:27 PM
bhn.net
9.4m/1.2m   anon @ Melbourne, FL, USA(flash speedtest)21st 11:44 PM
bhn.net
9.3m/1.1m   dellfromhell See Profile @ Melbourne Beach, FL, USA(flash speedtest)14th 04:32 PM
bhn.net
8.9m/1.1m   dellfromhell See Profile @ Melbourne Beach, FL, USA(flash speedtest)14th 04:29 PM
bhn.net
Comment:Brighthouse Cable
7.9m/3.4m  75m/5m Samwise75 See Profile @ Orlando, FL, USA(flash speedtest)6th 07:07 PM
bhn.net
Comment:Still seems a bit lame considering what is claimed.
7.8m/3.6m   anon @ Kissimmee, FL, USA(flash speedtest)23rd 08:46 PM
bhn.net
7.8m/2.2m   anon @ Bradenton, FL, USAMichigan, USA31st 08:46 AM
res.bhn.net
7.7m/4.1m   anon(flash speedtest)5th 08:15 PM
bhn.net
7.3m/3.7m   Samwise75 See Profile @ Orlando, FL, USA(flash speedtest)7th 12:25 PM
bhn.net
6.9m/2m   tabid See Profile @ Clermont, FL, USA(flash speedtest)27th 02:10 PM
bhn.net
4.7m/4.1m   anon @ Lake Mary, FL, USAAmazon cloud24th 04:35 PM
res.bhn.net
2.6m/179   anon @ Sun City Center, FL, USA(flash speedtest)15th 07:51 PM
bhn.net
2.2m/2.1m   anon @ Largo, FL, USA(flash speedtest)12th 10:28 PM
bhn.net
1.9m/2.6m   wgleightyjr See Profile @ Inverness, FL, USA(flash speedtest)17th 10:05 AM
bhn.net
1.8m/2m   anon @ Melbourne, FL, USA(flash speedtest)21st 11:45 PM
bhn.net
1.6m/2m   anon @ Altamonte Springs, FL, USA(flash speedtest)3rd 05:31 PM
bhn.net
1.3m/2.1m   anon @ Orlando, FL, USAMichigan, USA4th 07:49 PM
res.bhn.net
1.3m/11.3m   anon @ Plant City, FL, USAMichigan, USA4th 09:19 PM
res.bhn.net
1m/671   anon @ Altamonte Springs, FL, USA(flash speedtest)7th 06:33 PM
bhn.net
disclaimer: the data recorded in this table represents speeds recorded by users to test servers located around the USA, at the time the test done. The speeds displayed here are for informational value only: the data is open to interpretation and for a variety of reasons should not be considered an absolute ranking of ISPs. Because most of the speed test servers are based in the USA, there is a speed bias in favor of US domains, which are closer to the servers. Even within the USA, ISPs who are nearer the North-East or the West coast may on average record higher user speeds than elsewhere, as the Internet tends to be faster and have more inter-connections in those areas so latency is lower.