
how-to block ads
| domain bsnl.in Ordered by descending tested download speed Note: no more than the three best results from the same IP, or user, are included
| |
Speed Dwn/up | Claimed ISP & Speed | User Location | Test | Day Hour (EST) | Company & Domain |
|---|
| 90/294 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 10th 01:36 AM | bsnl.in | | 90/124 | | anon @ chennai | (flash speedtest) | 19th 12:22 PM | bsnl.in | | 88/37 | | anon | California, USA | 21st 05:34 PM | 10/24.bsnl.in | | 88/188 | bsnl 256/256 | anon | speedtest.teksavvy.com | 15th 08:00 AM | 10/24.bsnl.in | | 87/240 | | anon | New Jersey, USA | 5th 08:29 PM | 10/24.bsnl.in | | 87/121 | | anon @ ambala | (flash speedtest) | 15th 07:29 PM | bsnl.in | | 87/113 | | anon @ 211002 | (flash speedtest) | 8th 04:47 AM | bsnl.in | | 86/222 | | anon @ anantapur | (flash speedtest) | 23rd 08:28 AM | bsnl.in | | 85/221 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 6th 10:46 AM | bsnl.in | | 85/176 | | anon | California, USA | 16th 07:30 AM | 10/24.bsnl.in | | 82/127 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 22nd 12:09 AM | bsnl.in | | 81/54 | | anon | California, USA | 1st 09:49 AM | 10/24.bsnl.in | | 79/206 | | anon @ Nagpur | (flash speedtest) | 25th 01:40 PM | bsnl.in | | 78/200 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 25th 07:50 AM | bsnl.in | | 74/338 | | anon @ Bangalore | (flash speedtest) | 2nd 08:16 AM | bsnl.in | | 73/87 | | anon @ Kolkata | (flash speedtest) | 10th 04:07 PM | bsnl.in | | 68/52 | 130/100 | anon @ Chennai | (flash speedtest) | 14th 07:11 AM | bsnl.in | | 68/146 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 3rd 02:47 PM | bsnl.in | | 60/75 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 27th 08:45 PM | bsnl.in | | 60/51 | | anon @ Rajpura | (flash speedtest) | 19th 01:27 PM | bsnl.in | | 59/244 | | anon @ bangalore | (flash speedtest) | 15th 03:30 AM | bsnl.in | | 59/344 | | anon | New Jersey, USA | 30th 05:59 PM | 10/24.bsnl.in | | 59/193 | | anon @ Pune | (flash speedtest) | 13th 06:50 AM | bsnl.in | | 57/99 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 26th 08:33 PM | bsnl.in | | 56/188 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 25th 01:57 PM | bsnl.in | | 55/78 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 29th 10:55 AM | bsnl.in | | 52/99 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 3rd 12:10 PM | bsnl.in | | 47/53 | BSNL 256/- | anon @ bangalore | (flash speedtest) | 21st 09:59 AM | bsnl.in | | 46/161 | | anon @ chennai | (flash speedtest) | 8th 08:20 PM | bsnl.in | | 46/282 | | anon @ tenali | (flash speedtest) | 24th 04:07 AM | bsnl.in | | 46/138 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 10th 12:39 AM | bsnl.in | | 44/95 | | anon @ NOIDA | California, USA | 5th 11:46 AM | 10/24.bsnl.in | | 40/38 | | anon @ Lucknow | New Jersey, USA | 23rd 06:56 AM | 10/24.bsnl.in | | 39/43 | | anon @ Kolkata | (flash speedtest) | 8th 08:46 AM | bsnl.in | | 38/68 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 14th 01:46 AM | bsnl.in | | 37/25 | | anon | New Jersey, USA | 29th 08:53 AM | 10/24.bsnl.in | | 36/213 | | anon @ chennai | (flash speedtest) | 29th 05:17 AM | bsnl.in | | 31/206 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 8th 04:43 PM | bsnl.in | | 31/157 | | anon @ Lucknow | California, USA | 21st 04:45 AM | 10/24.bsnl.in | | 30/36 | | anon @ chennai | (flash speedtest) | 12th 03:02 PM | bsnl.in | | 30/92 | | anon @ salem | California, USA | 27th 01:34 AM | 10/24.bsnl.in | | 29/259 | | anon @ chennau | (flash speedtest) | 5th 02:44 AM | bsnl.in | | 28/33 | | anon @ Trivandrum | California, USA | 21st 05:58 AM | 10/24.bsnl.in | | 28/68 | | anon @ dehradun | (flash speedtest) | 28th 11:39 AM | bsnl.in | | disclaimer: the data recorded in this table represents speeds recorded by users to test servers located around the USA, at the time the test done. The speeds displayed here are for informational value only: the data is open to interpretation and for a variety of reasons should not be considered an absolute ranking of ISPs. Because most of the speed test servers are based in the USA, there is a speed bias in favor of US domains, which are closer to the servers. Even within the USA, ISPs who are nearer the North-East or the West coast may on average record higher user speeds than elsewhere, as the Internet tends to be faster and have more inter-connections in those areas so latency is lower. |
|