
how-to block ads
| domain buckeyecom.net Ordered by descending tested download speed Note: no more than the three best results from the same IP, or user, are included
| |
Speed Dwn/up | Claimed ISP & Speed | User Location | Test | Day Hour (EST) | Company & Domain |
|---|
| 8m/920 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Toledo, OH, USA | (flash speedtest) | 15th 11:55 AM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 7.7m/991 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Lambertville, MI, USA | (flash speedtest) | 29th 02:39 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 7m/925 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Sylvania, OH, USA | (flash speedtest) | 27th 09:27 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 7m/841 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Lambertville, MI, USA | (flash speedtest) | 29th 02:43 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 5.2m/562 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Holland, OH, USA | California, USA | 23rd 07:55 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 5m/478 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Toledo, OH, USA | (flash speedtest) | 15th 09:17 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 4.9m/568 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Lambertville, MI, USA | (flash speedtest) | 7th 01:20 AM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 4.9m/566 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Holland, OH, USA | California, USA | 24th 06:54 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 4.8m/567 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ 43613-3843 | (flash speedtest) | 8th 05:28 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 4.6m/567 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Oregon, OH, USA | California, USA | 3rd 12:32 AM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 4.5m/546 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Toledo, OH, USA | (flash speedtest) | 19th 10:09 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 4.1m/295 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon | California, USA | 3rd 12:29 AM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 2.2m/347 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon | (flash speedtest) | 1st 08:19 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 1.9m/197 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon | (flash speedtest) | 3rd 10:39 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 1.8m/201 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Toledo, OH, USA | (flash speedtest) | 25th 06:39 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 1.8m/203 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Sylvania, OH, USA | (flash speedtest) | 13th 12:11 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 1.6m/48 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon | (flash speedtest) | 27th 01:10 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 1.3m/191 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon | California, USA | 31st 01:22 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 1m/75 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Lambertville, MI, USA | (flash speedtest) | 4th 12:49 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 970/519 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Toledo, OH, USA | (flash speedtest) | 18th 08:21 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 851/1.4m | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon | (flash speedtest) | 28th 11:52 AM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 689/549 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon | California, USA | 13th 10:05 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | 102/110 | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. | anon @ Toledo, OH, USA | California, USA | 24th 11:49 PM | Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. buckeyecom.net | | disclaimer: the data recorded in this table represents speeds recorded by users to test servers located around the USA, at the time the test done. The speeds displayed here are for informational value only: the data is open to interpretation and for a variety of reasons should not be considered an absolute ranking of ISPs. Because most of the speed test servers are based in the USA, there is a speed bias in favor of US domains, which are closer to the servers. Even within the USA, ISPs who are nearer the North-East or the West coast may on average record higher user speeds than elsewhere, as the Internet tends to be faster and have more inter-connections in those areas so latency is lower. |
|