how-to block ads
| domain on.net
Ordered by descending tested download speed
Note: no more than the three best results from the same IP, or user, are included
| |
Speed
Dwn/up | Claimed
ISP & Speed | User
Location | Test | Day
Hour
(EST) | Company &
Domain |
|---|
| 5.1m/814 | Internode | 
anon @ 2037 | (flash speedtest) | 24th 03:03 AM | Internode
on.net | | 3.3m/583 | Internode |
anon @ 2065 | (flash speedtest) | 1st 07:42 PM | Internode
on.net | | 2.4m/572 | Internode |
anon @ 03 | California, USA | 3rd 06:35 AM | Internode
lns20.mel4.internode.on.net | | 2.4m/746 | Internode 24m/1000 |
anon @ 4170 | California, USA | 5th 03:48 AM | Internode
static.internode.on.net | | 2.3m/259 | Internode |
anon @ 03 | California, USA | 1st 07:13 PM | Internode
lns20.mel4.internode.on.net | | 2.2m/319 | Internode 2.2m/319 |
anon @ 4551 | (flash speedtest) | 29th 11:47 PM | Internode
on.net | | 2.2m/629 | Internode |
anon @ 4701 | California, USA | 11th 01:35 AM | Internode
lns20.bne1.internode.on.net | | 2.1m/636 | Internode |
anon @ 2000 | California, USA | 13th 06:19 AM | Internode
lns20.syd7.internode.on.net | | 2.1m/636 | Internode |
anon | California, USA | 13th 06:18 AM | Internode
lns20.syd7.internode.on.net | | 2m/1.1m | Internode |
ccwhim  | (flash speedtest) | 15th 09:59 PM | Internode
on.net | | 1.9m/161 | Internode |
anon | New Jersey, USA | 10th 11:35 PM | Internode
lns20.syd7.internode.on.net | | 1.9m/814 | Internode |
anon | California, USA | 3rd 04:05 PM | Internode
lns20.adl2.internode.on.net | | 1.6m/659 | Internode |
anon | California, USA | 27th 09:04 AM | Internode
lns20.adl2.internode.on.net | | 1.3m/530 | Internode |
anon @ 5070 | New Jersey, USA | 26th 06:35 AM | Internode
lns20.adl2.internode.on.net | | 1.3m/614 | Internode |
anon @ 5000 | (flash speedtest) | 26th 06:18 PM | Internode
on.net | | 1.3m/224 | Internode |
anon @ 3128 | (flash speedtest) | 4th 04:34 PM | Internode
on.net | | 1.3m/454 | Internode |
anon | California, USA | 15th 08:11 PM | Internode
lns20.bne1.internode.on.net | | 1.2m/728 | Internode |
anon @ 2122 | California, USA | 19th 10:13 PM | Internode
lns20.syd6.internode.on.net | | 1.1m/201 | Internode |
anon @ 90210 | California, USA | 13th 08:44 PM | Internode
lns20.mel4.internode.on.net | | 1.1m/233 | Internode |
anon @ 4207 | California, USA | 7th 06:56 AM | Internode
lns20.bne1.internode.on.net | | 1.1m/341 | Internode |
anon @ 2747 | (flash speedtest) | 14th 07:34 PM | Internode
on.net | | 978/149 | Internode |
anon @ 2646 | (flash speedtest) | 29th 02:37 AM | Internode
on.net | | 923/744 | Internode |
anon | (flash speedtest) | 3rd 06:48 AM | Internode
on.net | | 899/628 | Internode |
anon @ 3214 | California, USA | 19th 12:06 AM | Internode
lns20.mel4.internode.on.net | | 822/778 | Internode |
anon | (flash speedtest) | 18th 10:46 PM | Internode
on.net | | 763/216 | Internode |
anon | California, USA | 4th 07:17 AM | Internode
lns20.bne4.internode.on.net | | 697/249 | Internode |
anon | (flash speedtest) | 11th 07:54 AM | Internode
on.net | | 682/300 | Internode |
anon | (flash speedtest) | 4th 07:09 PM | Internode
on.net | | 635/632 | Internode |
anon @ 5125 | California, USA | 7th 03:27 PM | Internode
lns20.adl2.internode.on.net | | 483/313 | Internode |
anon | (flash speedtest) | 28th 10:27 AM | Internode
on.net | | 428/100 | Internode |
anon | (flash speedtest) | 14th 08:38 PM | Internode
on.net | | 395/101 | Internode |
anon | (flash speedtest) | 20th 09:42 AM | Internode
on.net | | 394/101 | Internode |
anon | (flash speedtest) | 28th 08:23 PM | Internode
on.net | | 244/182 | Internode |
anon @ 5092 | (flash speedtest) | 2nd 06:12 AM | Internode
on.net | | disclaimer: the data recorded in this table represents speeds recorded by users to test servers located around the USA, at the time the test done. The speeds displayed here are for informational value only: the data is open to interpretation and for a variety of reasons should not be considered an absolute ranking of ISPs. Because most of the speed test servers are based in the USA, there is a speed bias in favor of US domains, which are closer to the servers. Even within the USA, ISPs who are nearer the North-East or the West coast may on average record higher user speeds than elsewhere, as the Internet tends to be faster and have more inter-connections in those areas so latency is lower. |
|
