
how-to block ads
| domain telfort.nl Ordered by descending tested download speed Note: no more than the three best results from the same IP, or user, are included
| |
Speed Dwn/up | Claimed ISP & Speed | User Location | Test | Day Hour (EST) | Company & Domain |
|---|
| 8.1m/811 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 1st 08:35 AM | telfort.nl | | 6m/486 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 25th 10:54 PM | telfort.nl | | 4.1m/852 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 29th 02:35 PM | telfort.nl | | 3.9m/879 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 30th 03:34 PM | telfort.nl | | 3.6m/197 | | anon @ Rotterdam | (flash speedtest) | 13th 08:31 PM | telfort.nl | | 3.5m/890 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 16th 11:29 AM | telfort.nl | | 3.3m/746 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 4th 12:45 PM | telfort.nl | | 3.3m/363 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 10th 04:13 PM | telfort.nl | | 3.2m/592 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 3rd 07:04 AM | telfort.nl | | 3m/537 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 18th 04:41 PM | telfort.nl | | 2.6m/40 | | anon @ den helder | California, USA | 22nd 11:05 AM | ip.telfort.nl | | 2.5m/809 | | anon | California, USA | 4th 07:35 AM | ip.telfort.nl | | 2.5m/578 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 8th 05:12 PM | telfort.nl | | 2.4m/553 | | anon | California, USA | 12th 11:06 AM | ip.telfort.nl | | 2.3m/733 | | anon @ uitwijk | California, USA | 24th 05:19 PM | ip.telfort.nl | | 2.3m/733 | | anon | California, USA | 24th 05:18 PM | ip.telfort.nl | | 2.3m/774 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 19th 06:35 AM | telfort.nl | | 2.3m/773 | | anon | California, USA | 9th 03:59 PM | ip.telfort.nl | | 2.1m/228 | | anon @ Utrecht | (flash speedtest) | 24th 07:43 AM | telfort.nl | | 2.1m/608 | | anon @ Boxtel | (flash speedtest) | 3rd 07:00 PM | telfort.nl | | 2m/800 | | anon @ Rotterdam | (flash speedtest) | 29th 12:01 PM | telfort.nl | | 2m/503 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 23rd 04:55 PM | telfort.nl | | 2m/427 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 28th 11:36 AM | telfort.nl | | 1.9m/688 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 9th 12:38 PM | telfort.nl | | 1.9m/513 | | anon @ haarlem | (flash speedtest) | 1st 01:53 PM | telfort.nl | | 1.6m/304 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 10th 06:03 AM | telfort.nl | | 1.5m/517 | | anon @ Amersfoort | California, USA | 14th 01:27 PM | ip.telfort.nl | | 1.5m/113 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 15th 05:03 AM | telfort.nl | | 1.4m/353 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 4th 02:11 AM | telfort.nl | | 1.4m/743 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 4th 06:44 AM | telfort.nl | | 1.3m/298 | | anon | California, USA | 24th 01:29 PM | ip.telfort.nl | | 1.3m/751 | | anon | California, USA | 2nd 08:13 AM | ip.telfort.nl | | 1.2m/671 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 1st 03:40 PM | telfort.nl | | 1.2m/444 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 23rd 10:35 AM | telfort.nl | | 1.1m/922 | | anon @ Rotterdam | California, USA | 23rd 10:08 PM | ip.telfort.nl | | 1m/303 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 26th 02:14 PM | telfort.nl | | 1m/865 | | anon | New Jersey, USA | 22nd 12:07 PM | ip.telfort.nl | | 908/1.9m | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 20th 12:46 PM | telfort.nl | | 880/228 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 8th 04:09 PM | telfort.nl | | 857/558 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 30th 03:10 AM | telfort.nl | | 829/622 | | anon | (flash speedtest) | 30th 09:17 PM | telfort.nl | | 783/848 | | anon @ Heelsum | (flash speedtest) | 20th 01:11 PM | telfort.nl | | 495/109 | | anon | California, USA | 19th 04:28 PM | ip.telfort.nl | | 230/33 | | anon @ 2023BC | (flash speedtest) | 15th 06:37 AM | telfort.nl | | 90/461 | | anon | California, USA | 5th 04:12 AM | ip.telfort.nl | | 90/461 | | anon | California, USA | 5th 04:10 AM | ip.telfort.nl | | disclaimer: the data recorded in this table represents speeds recorded by users to test servers located around the USA, at the time the test done. The speeds displayed here are for informational value only: the data is open to interpretation and for a variety of reasons should not be considered an absolute ranking of ISPs. Because most of the speed test servers are based in the USA, there is a speed bias in favor of US domains, which are closer to the servers. Even within the USA, ISPs who are nearer the North-East or the West coast may on average record higher user speeds than elsewhere, as the Internet tends to be faster and have more inter-connections in those areas so latency is lower. |
|