
how-to block ads
|
domain verizon.net Ordered by descending tested download speed Note: no more than the three best results from the same IP, or user, are included
| |
Speed Dwn/up | Claimed ISP & Speed | User Location | Test | Day Hour (EST) | Company & Domain |
|---|
| 93m/60m | Verizon Communications | aaronwt @ Woodbridge, VA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 21st 12:51 AM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | Comment: | FiOS 150/65 | | 92.4m/60.1m | Verizon Communications | aaronwt @ Woodbridge, VA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 22nd 01:01 AM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | Comment: | FiOS 150/65 | | 92.2m/55.1m | Verizon Communications | aaronwt @ Woodbridge, VA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 21st 12:42 AM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | Comment: | FiOS 150/65 | | 92.1m/29.2m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Chester, PA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 22nd 02:22 AM | Verizon Communications phlapa.fios.verizon.net | | 92.1m/28.6m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Chester, PA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 22nd 04:38 AM | Verizon Communications phlapa.fios.verizon.net | | 92m/23.6m | Verizon Communications | anon | New Jersey, USA | 18th 07:15 AM | Verizon Communications phlapa.fios.verizon.net | | 90.3m/60.8m | Verizon Communications | anon @ West Sayville, NY, USA | New Jersey, USA | 27th 01:33 PM | Verizon Communications nycmny.fios.verizon.net | | 84.8m/31.6m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Nokesville, VA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 9th 07:35 AM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | 83.7m/31.4m | Verizon Communications | rhdcheme @ Lorton, VA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 23rd 07:22 AM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | 83.7m/33.9m | Verizon Communications | rhdcheme @ Lorton, VA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 14th 07:22 AM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | 83.7m/30.4m | Verizon Communications | rhdcheme @ Lorton, VA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 21st 07:30 AM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | 83.4m/33.8m | Verizon Communications | anon | New Jersey, USA | 11th 07:40 AM | Verizon Communications nycmny.fios.verizon.net | | 83.4m/33.6m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Annapolis, MD, USA | New Jersey, USA | 16th 01:22 PM | Verizon Communications bltmmd.fios.verizon.net | | 83.1m/44.6m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Nokesville, VA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 9th 07:32 AM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | 83m/35.6m | Verizon Communications | SG79 @ New York, NY, USA | New Jersey, USA | 4th 08:45 PM | Verizon Communications nycmny.fios.verizon.net | | Comment: | 75/35 | | 82.6m/29.6m | Verizon Communications | SG79 @ New York, NY, USA | New Jersey, USA | 2nd 11:30 AM | Verizon Communications nycmny.fios.verizon.net | | 81.6m/54.7m | Verizon Communications | anon @ West Sayville, NY, USA | New Jersey, USA | 27th 01:33 PM | Verizon Communications nycmny.fios.verizon.net | | 81m/34.6m | Verizon Communications | SG79 @ New York, NY, USA | New Jersey, USA | 2nd 11:31 AM | Verizon Communications nycmny.fios.verizon.net | | Comment: | 75/35 connection | | 78.9m/36.6m | Verizon Communications | anon | New Jersey, USA | 1st 06:37 PM | Verizon Communications phlapa.fios.verizon.net | | 78.7m/34.3m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Reston, VA, USA | www.broadbandreports.com | 4th 02:53 PM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | 78.7m/31.6m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Staten Island, NY, USA | New Jersey, USA | 26th 01:51 PM | Verizon Communications nycmny.fios.verizon.net | | 74.1m/35.8m | Verizon Communications | focuser @ Elmwood Park, NJ, USA | New Jersey, USA | 3rd 06:27 PM | Verizon Communications nwrknj.fios.verizon.net | | 73.9m/36.1m | Verizon Communications | focuser @ Elmwood Park, NJ, USA | New Jersey, USA | 21st 12:05 AM | Verizon Communications nwrknj.fios.verizon.net | | 73m/30.8m | Verizon Communications | jhadwood @ Gainesville, VA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 1st 02:10 AM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | Comment: | Fios 75/35 | | 72.8m/8.5m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Howard Beach, NY, USA | (flash speedtest) | 23rd 08:15 PM | Verizon Communications verizon.net | | 72.5m/58m | Verizon Communications | anon | New Jersey, USA | 10th 05:34 AM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | 72.5m/38.9m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Nokesville, VA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 9th 07:37 AM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | 72.1m/33.4m | Verizon Communications | anon @ West Islip, NY, USA | New Jersey, USA | 29th 09:47 PM | Verizon Communications nycmny.fios.verizon.net | | 67.4m/56.2m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Nyack, NY, USA | New Jersey, USA | 2nd 10:57 AM | Verizon Communications nycmny.fios.verizon.net | | 64.4m/30.7m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Chantilly, VA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 23rd 02:28 PM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | 64.4m/31.4m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Fulton, MD, USA | New Jersey, USA | 17th 07:55 PM | Verizon Communications washdc.fios.verizon.net | | 64.2m/30.5m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Elizabeth, PA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 4th 06:47 AM | Verizon Communications pitbpa.fios.verizon.net | | 61.7m/31.9m | Verizon Communications | anon @ Ambler, PA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 17th 11:46 AM | Verizon Communications phlapa.fios.verizon.net | | 60.3m/33.9m | Verizon Communications 75/35 | anon @ Ambler, PA, USA | New Jersey, USA | 23rd 09:57 AM | Verizon Communications phlapa.fios.verizon.net | | disclaimer: the data recorded in this table represents speeds recorded by users to test servers located around the USA, at the time the test done. The speeds displayed here are for informational value only: the data is open to interpretation and for a variety of reasons should not be considered an absolute ranking of ISPs. Because most of the speed test servers are based in the USA, there is a speed bias in favor of US domains, which are closer to the servers. Even within the USA, ISPs who are nearer the North-East or the West coast may on average record higher user speeds than elsewhere, as the Internet tends to be faster and have more inter-connections in those areas so latency is lower. |
|