
how-to block ads
| domain xo.net Ordered by descending tested download speed Note: no more than the three best results from the same IP, or user, are included
| |
Speed Dwn/up | Claimed ISP & Speed | User Location | Test | Day Hour (EST) | Company & Domain |
|---|
| 41m/16.7m | XO Communications | anon @ Mountain View, CA, USA | California, USA | 15th 01:05 AM | XO Communications 220.xx.2.ptr.us.xo.net | | 37.5m/34.8m | XO Communications | anon @ Long Beach, CA, USA | California, USA | 2nd 06:56 PM | XO Communications 0.xx.226.ptr.us.xo.net | | 32.6m/13.3m | XO Communications | anon | California, USA | 2nd 12:04 AM | XO Communications 158.xx.36.ptr.us.xo.net | | 32.6m/13.3m | XO Communications | anon | California, USA | 2nd 12:04 AM | XO Communications 158.xx.36.ptr.us.xo.net | | 12.1m/6.8m | XO Communications | anon @ New York, NY, USA | (flash speedtest) | 29th 12:03 PM | XO Communications xo.net | | 10.7m/17.9m | XO Communications | anon @ Plano, TX, USA | California, USA | 6th 09:54 AM | XO Communications xo.net | | 3.3m/1.9m | XO Communications | anon @ Houston, TX, USA | (flash speedtest) | 14th 03:11 PM | XO Communications xo.net | | 1.4m/1.3m | XO Communications | anon | New Jersey, USA | 28th 01:24 PM | XO Communications 4.xx.178.ptr.us.xo.net | | 1.3m/1.3m | XO Communications | anon @ West Chester, PA, USA | (flash speedtest) | 2nd 02:52 PM | XO Communications xo.net | | 1.2m/1.1m | XO Communications | anon | (flash speedtest) | 20th 07:34 AM | XO Communications xo.net | | 1.2m/732 | XO Communications | guidice @ Austin, TX, USA | (flash speedtest) | 12th 09:10 PM | XO Communications xo.net | | Comment: | Hilton Garden Inn - Austin, TX | | 1.1m/920 | XO Communications | anon @ Chicago, IL, USA | (flash speedtest) | 21st 06:31 PM | XO Communications xo.net | | 1m/1.2m | XO Communications | anon | (flash speedtest) | 28th 01:20 PM | XO Communications xo.net | | 1m/1.1m | XO Communications | anon | California, USA | 2nd 08:09 PM | XO Communications 221.xx.70.ptr.us.xo.net | | 903/1.3m | XO Communications | anon @ Pasadena, CA, USA | California, USA | 28th 03:19 PM | XO Communications 108.xx.187.ptr.us.xo.net | | 463/500 | XO Communications | jbwilkins @ Houston, TX, USA | (flash speedtest) | 30th 04:12 AM | XO Communications xo.net | | Comment: | Hilton Garden Inn, Energy Corridor | | 457/489 | XO Communications | jbwilkins @ Houston, TX, USA | (flash speedtest) | 27th 05:30 PM | XO Communications xo.net | | Comment: | Hilton Garden Inn Katy Freeway | | 453/496 | XO Communications | jbwilkins @ Houston, TX, USA | California, USA | 27th 05:32 PM | XO Communications 236.xx.228.ptr.us.xo.net | | Comment: | Hilton Garden Inn Katy Freeway | | 446/446 | XO Communications | anon @ Sacramento, CA, USA | California, USA | 14th 10:58 PM | XO Communications 50.xx.195.ptr.us.xo.net | | 189/977 | XO Communications | anon @ Fair Lawn, NJ, USA | (flash speedtest) | 26th 10:05 PM | XO Communications xo.net | | 168/289 | XO Communications | anon @ Palo Alto, CA, USA | California, USA | 21st 07:07 PM | XO Communications 36.xx.182.ptr.us.xo.net | | 107/20 | XO Communications | anon @ Marina Del Rey, CA, USA | California, USA | 16th 09:32 PM | XO Communications xo.net | | 89/469 | XO Communications | anon @ Marina Del Rey, CA, USA | (flash speedtest) | 5th 12:26 AM | XO Communications xo.net | | 85/26 | XO Communications | anon | California, USA | 28th 12:12 AM | XO Communications xo.net | | disclaimer: the data recorded in this table represents speeds recorded by users to test servers located around the USA, at the time the test done. The speeds displayed here are for informational value only: the data is open to interpretation and for a variety of reasons should not be considered an absolute ranking of ISPs. Because most of the speed test servers are based in the USA, there is a speed bias in favor of US domains, which are closer to the servers. Even within the USA, ISPs who are nearer the North-East or the West coast may on average record higher user speeds than elsewhere, as the Internet tends to be faster and have more inter-connections in those areas so latency is lower. |
|