dslreports logo
site
spacer

spacer
 
    Intro FAQ Speed Tests Line Quality Smoke Ping Tweak Test Line Monitor Monitor Groups »»
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


« Back to speed test statistics

Enter ZIP or Postal Code (partial ok):

SouthWestern Bell

Data from domains 'swbell.net' 'ded.swbell.net' 'hstntx.swbell.net' 'rcsntx.swbell.net' 'austtx.swbell.net' 'elpstx.swbell.net' 'ksc2mo.swbell.net' 'kscymo.swbell.net' 'lbcktx.swbell.net' 'ltrkar.swbell.net' 'okcyok.swbell.net' 'snantx.swbell.net' 'spfdmo.swbell.net' 'stlsmo.swbell.net' 'tpkaks.swbell.net' 'tulsok.swbell.net' 'wchtks.swbell.net' 'fyvlar.swbell.net'
See: reviews and info for AT&T Southwest
Ordered by descending tested download speed
Note: no more than the three best results from the same IP, or user, are included
Speed
Dwn/up
Claimed
ISP & Speed
User
Location
TestDay
Hour
(EST)
Company &
Domain
4.9m/511   anon @ Cypress, TX, USA(flash speedtest)22nd 10:27 AMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
4.7m/577   anon @ Houston, TX, USA(flash speedtest)11th 12:44 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
4.7m/631   anon @ Longview, TX, USA(flash speedtest)15th 09:31 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
4.7m/631   anon @ Longview, TX, USA(flash speedtest)15th 09:22 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
3.8m/629   anon @ Kearney, MO, USA(flash speedtest)5th 11:17 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
2.5m/410   anon @ Saint Louis, MO, USA(flash speedtest)15th 09:40 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
2.4m/421   anon @ Independence, MO, USA(flash speedtest)28th 02:40 AMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
2.4m/409   anon @ Saint Louis, MO, USA(flash speedtest)10th 03:56 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
2.2m/414   anon @ Houston, TX, USA(flash speedtest)21st 08:56 AMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
2.1m/421   Sarastro See Profile @ Dallas, TX, USANew Jersey, USA24th 07:40 PMSouthWestern Bell
dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net
2m/405   anon @ Amarillo, TX, USA(flash speedtest)4th 12:04 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
1.7m/436   anon @ Saint Louis, MO, USANew Jersey, USA17th 11:18 PMSouthWestern Bell
dsl.stlsmo.swbell.net
1.5m/401   anon @ Hugo, OK, USA(flash speedtest)18th 10:21 AMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
1.3m/79   gigadiva See Profile @ Saint Louis, MO, USANew Jersey, USA3rd 11:53 PMSouthWestern Bell
dialup.stlsmo.swbell.net
1.2m/307   anon @ Newton, KS, USA(flash speedtest)9th 11:07 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
1.2m/303   anon @ Newton, KS, USA(flash speedtest)9th 04:01 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
1.1m/493   anon @ Dallas, TX, USA(flash speedtest)25th 12:24 AMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
1m/423   anon @ Strafford, MO, USA(flash speedtest)21st 11:42 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
848/312   anon(flash speedtest)26th 11:04 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
840/580   anon @ Fort Worth, TX, USA(flash speedtest)20th 02:46 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
741/488   anon @ Houston, TX, USANew Jersey, USA28th 04:50 PMSouthWestern Bell
dsl.hstntx.swbell.net
740/602   anon @ Oklahoma City, OK, USA(flash speedtest)19th 12:17 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
649/315   anon @ Austin, TX, USA(flash speedtest)20th 09:35 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
519/232   anon @ San Antonio, TX, USA(flash speedtest)8th 10:47 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
319/617   anon @ Florissant, MO, USA(flash speedtest)9th 08:13 AMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
240/322   anon @ Independence, MO, USA(flash speedtest)9th 08:25 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
167/51sbcglobal.net  167/51 anon @ Wolfe City, TX, USA(flash speedtest)19th 04:15 PMSouthWestern Bell
swbell.net
disclaimer: the data recorded in this table represents speeds recorded by users to test servers located around the USA, at the time the test done. The speeds displayed here are for informational value only: the data is open to interpretation and for a variety of reasons should not be considered an absolute ranking of ISPs. Because most of the speed test servers are based in the USA, there is a speed bias in favor of US domains, which are closer to the servers. Even within the USA, ISPs who are nearer the North-East or the West coast may on average record higher user speeds than elsewhere, as the Internet tends to be faster and have more inter-connections in those areas so latency is lower.