News tagged: AT&T DSL Service
After Google Fiber announced their expansion plans to Austin, AT&T rushed to announce that they too would be offering 1 Gbps service in the weird city. There were of course caveats for AT&T's service, including a bevy of fees not included in Google Fiber connections and a $30 surcharge
if you refused to have your online behavior tracked and monetized. There was another little catch as well: AT&T rushed so quickly to field their "Gigapower" product that it was only able to deliver 300 Mbps downstream.
AT&T has announced that this has changed, with 1 Gbps customers in Austin now actually seeing 1 Gbps. An AT&T announcement
notes that the upgrades should occur automatically for free.
"Those already subscribed to U-verse with AT&T GigaPower featuring speeds up to 300 Mbps will see their Internet speeds upgraded to up to 1 Gbps at no additional cost in the coming weeks," notes the telco. "Existing customers don't need to do anything, the upgrades will happen automatically."
AT&T's Gigapower is primarily aimed at higher-end developments and apartment complexes, and the ultra-fast speeds will not be extended to the majority of the telco's customers despite a bevy of recent "fiber to the press release" announcements
. If you're one of the select few Austinites that actually can get these speeds from AT&T, let us know what you think in the comment section below.
Back in March AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson insisted that AT&T's 1 Gbps "Gigapower" service would arrive in Dallas sometime this summer
, but like much of the company's 1 Gbps deployment, specifics (deployment areas, total cost, number of users) was left ambiguous. Today AT&T got a little more specific, stating the company would be offering the ultra-fast service in "Dallas, Fort Worth, and surrounding cities" before the summer is out.
Long-time telecom analyst Bruce Kushnick has a good read
exploring how AT&T keeps making the same broadband deployment promises over and over again every time they want something from government, and nobody in the technology press can be bothered to notice. In 2004, in addition to 100 Mbps lines never provided, AT&T (then SBC) promised to deploy broadband to every home in their 22-state footprint in exchange for regulators locking the FiOS and U-Verse networks off from open access policies and competition.
At the same time AT&T was quietly informing investors that the company would be cutting fixed-line network investment
, the company was telling regulators that they'd expand fiber to the home 1 Gbps "Gigapower" service if their acquisition of DirecTV is approved. In filings with regulators
, AT&T promised that if regulators approve their takeover of DirecTV, the company would deploy Gigapower to two million locations:
AT&T said in a regulatory filing Tuesday that the DirecTV deal would enable it to upgrade 2 million additional locations to "Gigapower" fiber connections, and expand high speed broadband coverage overall to 13 million locations.
Jefferies analyst George Notter wrote a note to investors this week
that AT&T "significantly reduced" the company's spending on their fixed-line network last month, something that has spooked AT&T hardware vendors like Ciena, Juniper and Adtran. If you've been reading our reports this shouldn't shock you; AT&T's been cutting fixed-line network investment each year for some time.
Lafayette Louisiana's LUS Fiber faced very sleazy efforts by Cox and BellSouth
years ago when trying to launch; efforts that went so far as the two companies hiring push pollsters to try and tell locals taxpayer money would be used to fund pornography. Some pollsters even tried to tell locals that if they approved the municipal broadband project, the government would restrict their television watching
to just a few days a week.
AT&T didn't waste any time today selling the company's planned acquisition of DirecTV
using AT&T's special brand of massaged statistics and misleading claims. Both AT&T and DirecTV CEOs are already promising that eliminating a pay TV competitor will somehow bring consumers more competitive pricing, though most consumer argue the exact opposite is likely to happen.
So why is AT&T rumored to be buying DirecTV in a deal estimated to be worth $50 billion? To hear USAToday tell it
, it's because AT&T wants to bundle satellite TV service with DSL in areas they don't sell U-Verse TV, but somebody apparently forgot to tell the news outlet that AT&T is busy hanging up on most of these users
because they don't want to upgrade them, making that theory less likely.
Perhaps they're just really excited to get into the satellite TV business? Except the satellite business isn't a high growth market, it's a highly saturated market meaning no real subscriber growth in TV user additions in the foreseeable future.
When AT&T first launched their 1 Gbps (which is still actually 300 Mbps
, but whatever) "Gigapower" service in Austin late last year in response to Google Fiber, the company's pricing raised a few eyebrows. In addition to the $350 ETF, installation and activation fees (which Google doesn't charge), AT&T only matched Google's $70 pricing point if you agreed to opt in to the company's Internet Preferences
, which goes beyond Google-esque snooping to use deep packet inspection to track each and every website you visit, and for how long.
At the Cable Show today in Los Angeles, former cable lobbyist turned current FCC boss Tom Wheeler was ironically interviewed by former FCC boss turned cable lobbyist Michael Powell. In his comments to attendees
, Wheeler again tried to defend critics that say the Chairman's new neutrality rules actually do more harm than good
, in that they codify and protect incumbent ISP dreams of imposing all manner of new surcharges upon content companies and users.
Last week we noted how AT&T's decision to maybe
deploy 1 Gbps fiber to 100 cities was a major bluff
, in that AT&T isn't willing to actually spend the money to make that happen. Fixed-line investment is dropping year over year, and "GigaPower" is largely just a PR exercise aimed at countering Google Fiber in the media.
AT&T's 1 Gbps "Gigapower" product is currently only available in a portion of one market: Austin, Texas. At the moment users pay $70 ($100 if you don't want AT&T monetizing your browsing habits
) for 300 Mbps, though AT&T insists users will be able to get 1 Gbps service later this year.
Shortly after Google announced Google Fiber in Austin, AT&T announced that they too would be offering 1 Gbps "Gigapower" service in the city as well (though it's currently 300 Mbps
). At the time, AT&T denied that the move was in any way motivated by Google Fiber, and that AT&T was planning all along to offer 1 Gbps connections (even if no evidence supports that claim, and millions of AT&T users are lucky to get 6 Mbps).
AT&T today announced that the company is "eyeing" 100 potential target cities as locations they may
deploy faster 1 Gbps "Gigapower" service. According to the company's press release
, this "major initiative" will target 100 "candidate cities and municipalities" across 21 metropolitan areas nationwide.
Currently only available in a small portion of Austin at speeds of 300 Mbps, AT&T has recently hinted that their "1 Gbps Gigapower" U-Verse upgrade will soon be coming to portions of Dallas
and San Antonio
. Now AT&T is hinting that the faster service could appear in portions of the Triangle and Piedmont Triad regions of North Carolina.
For much of the last year Netflix streaming problems have plagued customers of large ISPs like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast
. To hear companies like Netflix and Level 3 tell it
, the large ISPs are letting peering connectivity intentionally degrade for two reasons: 1
, to make services that compete with their own products look bad and 2
, in the hopes of forcing content companies to pay significantly higher rates for direct interconnection.
The other day AT&T's top policy man Jim Cicconi called Netflix "arrogant"
and a freeloader, simply for expressing concern that large last-mile ISPs were looking to abuse peering relationships for profit and power. AT&T's comments weren't entirely unlike comments made by the company back in 2005, when then CEO Ed Whitacre poured gasoline on the network neutrality fight by insisting companies like Google wouldn't be able to "ride our pipes for free."
They don't, never have, and never will.
A 1.5 Mbps, 150 GB capped DSL line may cost AT&T very, very little to provide, but that isn't stopping the company from raising rates anyway. AT&T DSL users in the Southeast say they're getting a letter from AT&T
informing them the monthly cost of their 1.5 Mbps DSL lines will be bumped from $36.00 to $39.00 per month.
According to AT&T, the changes are necessary to provide the "best possible Internet experience" and to "better align our pricing structure across our entire service territory." Another user
points out that in fact all of the company's DSL lines in former-BellSouth territories (many of which are some of the least competitive in the country) are seeing $3 rate hikes:
Depending on your plan, monthly rates will increase by $3.00 or $3.05 per month. The new monthly rates will be as follows:
•AT&T High Speed Internet FastAccess DSL Lite - $31.00
•AT&T High Speed Internet FastAccess DSL Ultra - $39.00
•AT&T High Speed Internet FastAccess DSL Xtreme - $44.00
•AT&T High Speed Internet FastAccess DSL Xtreme 6.0 - $49.00
AT&T High Speed Internet Direct
•AT&T High Speed Internet FastAccess DSL Direct Lite - $36.00
•AT&T High Speed Internet FastAccess DSL Direct Ultra - $44.00
•AT&T High Speed Internet FastAccess DSL Direct Xtreme - $49.00
•AT&T High Speed Internet FastAccess DSL Direct Xtreme 6.0 - $54.00
Don't forget that AT&T already imposes a 150 GB cap on these DSL lines and charges users $10 per each additional 50 GB
. Also keep in mind that AT&T's actually interested in driving many of these customers to cable, as they're slowly in the process of shedding DSL territories
they're unwilling to upgrade.
As we've frequently discussed, AT&T and Verizon are in the process of going state by state gutting consumer protections on DSL and landlines in preparation of hanging up on users they don't want to upgrade. This has been pitched by the carriers as part of the "IP transition
" and states are often told by killing consumer protections they'll see better and greater networks than ever
·more stories, story search, most popular ..
Recent news contributors
, Karl Bode