 Review by SSX4life 
member for 9.2 years, 3329 visits, last login: 3 days ago
updated 1.6 years ago
 undisclosed location
 $55 per month- (12 month contract)
 about 8 days "Good connection speed and overall uptime." "Small blips in downtime and tech support is sub-par for non" "Decent ISP, but the price could be better. Will jet to Uverse when it comes in the area."
| Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection Reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
Cost keeps going up (over 55.00 a month just for internet now). Speed is flat lined over the last 6 years.
Overall it's the best (and only) option I have for internet in my area. So it's ok... not great, but ok.
**update**
Still going up in price, still flat in service. =(
Comments:
 | | Not true. "[Bottom Line] "The best (and only) residential ISP that you can go with in the Milwaukee/Fox-River or Racine/Kenosha area"
Umm dude, no it's not. There's a lot of ISPs in this area. And "the best" is debatable, since Time Warner Cable's maximum speed offering is 15/1 Mbps for about $65 a month. AT&T U-verse is available in all of these areas and their maximum speed offering is 24/3 Mbps for... about $65 a month.
In my opinion, Time Warner Cable needs to step up their game and bring their "Wideband" service (30/5 and 50/5) to this market because AT&T is currently kicking TWC's ass in the speed department. | |
|  | etaadmin
join:2002-01-17
Dallas, TX
kudos:1
1 edit | Re: Not true. said by 45612019
In my opinion, Time Warner Cable needs to step up their game and bring their "Wideband" service (30/5 and 50/5) to this market because AT&T is currently kicking TWC's ass in the speed department.
:
That would be true if uverse had good coverage but above 2,500 feet the service becomes crap... even with pair bonding.
TWC is kicking at&t's ass when it comes to coverage.
I agree that TWC has to raise the bar and deploy D3 in all their markets that would take care of uverse. | |
|
| |
|
