Search:  

 






how-to block ads



Member review of HughesNet Satellite Broadband


News tagged to this company
more information on the company
Full HughesNet Satellite Broadband Forum

Reviews:
read 882 reviews (151 positive) (463 negative)
If you wish to review this company, email reviews@dslreports.com
login for new review notification feature
Six Month Rating

Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Mail,DNS,News:
Value for money:


Speed test results 3 year trend

Review by ctceo See Profile
UPDATED: 196 days ago
member for 8.5 years, 2392 visits, last login: a few hours ago


Mishawaka,St Joseph,IN
Contract price not specified.
"Speed was better than advertised, and throughput was always consistent."
"Install Contractors, software reliability, Price, Caps, Throttled (FAPS), Need I say more?"
"Good ONLY if you can afford it, otherwise consider alternatives."
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Mail,DNS,News:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)

    I will state beforehand that I had the service when it was but a youngling, and it worked great for what it was intended, even worked for several non-lag problematic games. From what I hear the ping times have been greatly improved since my dealing with them in their first year of service.

    The installer that came out used spit to seal the broadcast node instead of the sealant that came with the dish, he insisted on doing everything his way, and not being very courteous to our polite requests on how to run the wire along the side of the house. He also insisted that the device (dish portion) did NOT need to be grounded even though there was a screw just for that purpose because the engineers knew that it built up a LOT of electrostatic charge and heat as it was running. (I went up after the tech left and connected the ground to a 6 ft copper ground rod using the appropriate gauge wire). After the hardware install he was clueless as for the software setup, and we had to wait several hours between tech calls to the NOC/Engineering to finalize getting the satellite heartbeats to time correctly, and get the drivers installed properly without the floppy drive killing the sat signal.

    But as I mentioned before I hear that service has increased greatly. I personally would only use it as a last resort, but would recommend it to businesses who cannot get ISDN/DSL/Cable/Wireless services in their area.

    Update 4/22/2009: Out of the 12 or so installs I have done in the past 5 years, The service quality has improved only slightly, but the prices remain near the same. The quality of the installers has improved a tad bit as well, though I still encountered the lack of proper grounding in about 60% of those installs.

    Followup comments:

    DunklinDonuts

    @direcpc.com

    Hughesnet

    HughesNet is horrible. The connection always times out even when it is bright and sunny with not a cloud in the sky, and it is way overpriced. It's a miracle that I can even get on to write this. Bottom line, don't buy HughesNet unless you want to get cheated.

    ctceo
    Premium
    join:2001-04-26
    South Bend, IN
    clubs:

    Re: Hughesnet

    I agree, I'd get 56k (shotgun) before I'd get Hughes net. 56k x 2 worked quite well for anything but large downloads. ISDN is still overpriced alongside T1.
    lrymal

    join:2004-02-24
    Joaquin, TX
    I've been blessed. It has been great for me, other than latency. I am very rural, though.

    Forums » comments on review of HughesNet Satellite Broadband


Sunday, 08-Nov 09:12:31 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole