Review by george357 member for 3.7 years, 1544 visits, last login: a few hours ago updated 1.9 years ago
Hot Springs,Madison,NC
Contract price not specified. "Much faster than Dial-up, available in where no other potions are." "Little slow during peak time, minor weather outages, a little expensive." "IF you have no option other than dial-up give it a shot"
| Pre Sales information: Install Co-ordination: Connection reliability: Mail,DNS,News: Value for money: (ratings above consensus)
|
I have had the HughesNet internet service since Aug. 21st 2009. I got the pro+ plan which gives an advertised 1.6mbs download and .25mbs upload for $79.99 a month. I get these speeds 19 hours a day with know problem, I get slowdowns between 6pm-10pm eastern time which are related to the increased usage of the system during that time. I have had only minor weather related outages since I got the system and when I do my satellite TV is usually out as well, just the nature of satellite communications. There is no way I would ever consider going back to dial-up but I would not hesitate to upgrade to a different type of provider either. DSL, FIOS, Cable, or a good Cellular plan is definitely going to be better than satellite but if you don't have those options then HughesNet is the way to go.
George
August 2 2010 Update:
Still using Hughesnet as it is the only solution available to me where I live other than dial-up. I am still very pleased with the service for what it is. I still highly recommend it if you can not get anything else and I recommend it over any of the 3g because of the caps on 3g. I attached a screenshot showing my actual download speeds during peak time this is right around average for me. Make sure you get a good install!!!
April 11 2011 Update:
I am still using Hughesnet and I remain very happy with the service. It is a little on the expensive side and has some inherent issues in the technology but if you do not have a terrestrial-based option available then I just do not think you can get anything better that Hughesnet.
July 21 2011 Update:
I just qualified for DSL through my local phone company and no longer use the Hughesnet service. I wanted to add that in the full two years I was with Hughes I had no problems whatsoever that were not related to the limitations of the satellite service. additionally I called the Hughes support once in the entire two years, about 10 minutes ago to cancel my account. The cancellation process went very smoothly and I expect no additional problems. As I have stated many times if you have no access to anything but Dial-up, Hughesnet satellite internet is the way to go, just make sure you understand the way it works and the limitations and you should have few to no problems.
Attachments:
Comments:
 | | Hughes.net
I'd like to express how happy I am for all the Hughes.net users that are contented with their service. As one of their customers since 2003, I cannot express the same level of satisfaction. After 8 years, numerous complaints, service calls (both phone and physical), 3 equipment changes and upgrading to the Professional Plus Package, my signal strength remains mid-90's or better. I had experienced significant drop-outs with previous equipment packages. I spent over $2000 in 2006 to purchase my current system, recommended, supplied and installed by Hughes.net. The Pro + package flaunted 1.5 MB download speeds and 425 MB daily FAP limits. My download speed averages in the 60 to 130 kbps range. A wide array of websites I do business with cannot function through Hughes.net's proprietary ISP structure.
Hughes.net remains my only alternative to dial-up where I live. I am aware they control many options concerning where a subscriber is placed within the satellite data flow subsequently throttling the majority of users merely by placing us in the most heavily trafficked channels. increasing their bottom line while holding the customer hostage by lack of competition.
For my online college courses, I've been forced to use Verizon's wireless broadband due to the fact Hughes.net bandwidth available to me will not support even the smallest streaming video lectures. Were another option to present itself, I would gladly abandon the thousands of dollars I've wasted on their service and their sadly lacking responsiveness to the customer's needs and complaints.
For those of you contented with this sorely over-rated ISP, you should thank your lucky stars you landed where you did and that there are those of us forced to suffer with far less for the same price without recourse, supporting a worthless company while a lucky few reap the benefits. | |
|  |  george357ius ad arma spondent libertasPremium join:2009-09-18 Candler, NC kudos:1 Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..
·HughesNet Satell..
| Re: Hughes.net said by TooLongSo :I'd like to express how happy I am for all the Hughes.net users that are contented with their service. As one of their customers since 2003, I cannot express the same level of satisfaction. After 8 years, numerous complaints, service calls (both phone and physical), 3 equipment changes and upgrading to the Professional Plus Package, my signal strength remains mid-90's or better. I had experienced significant drop-outs with previous equipment packages. I spent over $2000 in 2006 to purchase my current system, recommended, supplied and installed by Hughes.net. The Pro + package flaunted 1.5 MB download speeds and 425 MB daily FAP limits. My download speed averages in the 60 to 130 kbps range. A wide array of websites I do business with cannot function through Hughes.net's proprietary ISP structure.
Hughes.net remains my only alternative to dial-up where I live. I am aware they control many options concerning where a subscriber is placed within the satellite data flow subsequently throttling the majority of users merely by placing us in the most heavily trafficked channels. increasing their bottom line while holding the customer hostage by lack of competition.
For my online college courses, I've been forced to use Verizon's wireless broadband due to the fact Hughes.net bandwidth available to me will not support even the smallest streaming video lectures. Were another option to present itself, I would gladly abandon the thousands of dollars I've wasted on their service and their sadly lacking responsiveness to the customer's needs and complaints.
For those of you contented with this sorely over-rated ISP, you should thank your lucky stars you landed where you did and that there are those of us forced to suffer with far less for the same price without recourse, supporting a worthless company while a lucky few reap the benefits. I do not know why you have had such issues with the service but I tend to think it is related to the 1.) Level of installation your local tech's provide and 2.) The beam you are assigned to. From what I understand if the install is not as close to perfect as possible there will be issues and some beams are more crowded than others making the service slower. I am also taking online classes and if it were not for Hughes I could not do that easily because the dial-up here is painfully slow, much, much worse than Hughes. There has been mention is various threads of Ellen a customer service manager or something, if you could find one of those threads and email her your story it seems to me that she will go to bat for ya. -- The wise man seeks everything in himself; the ignorant man tries to get everything from somebody else. ~Anonymous
| |
|  |  |  | | Re: Hughes.net I am so sick of seeing posts that say "get a good installation and you'll be fine." I have been able to get the 1.6 Mb/sec promised from my Pro Plus plan, but only at times. These times were numerous when I first got the service in Sept. 2009. But as HughesNet gained more subscribers on their 9000 bird, these occasions of 1.6 Mb/sec downloads became few and far between.
I'm located near (but not near enough) a high-tech research area where real DSL should have been provided by now. I think most people assume we've got it. All the government seed money seem to be going to the really remote locations. I'm sure the demand for satellite ISP is very dense in my area and I suspect Hughesnet just can't fill the need. They've made numerous attempts to juggle their network settings and nothing works. I'm lucky to get 400 Kb/sec downloads in the evenings.
WISP is just now getting to my horizon. At the end of my term, I will definitely give it a try. | |
|
 | | I can't believe this company is running The people that install or work for this company are the only ones posting/selling you this garbage. I have had Hughes Net for 6 months and it is an absolute ripoff of a service and the customer support is an outsourced joke.
It sure is quick to find the link that is readily prepared for you to cancel your service, box up their pitiful equipment yourself, and send them a $400 fee for having to put up with it.
Finally, Comcast decided to run down my footprint where I built my new house and I have Internet freedom and real speed at a fair price.
Don't fall for this scam unless you live somewhere in which no other options are available. If you live somewhere like that, just go without Internet or visit a library because having Hughes is basically like having none anyway, except you get to pay about $30-$40 more than a real ISP per month. | |
|
 | |
|