Search:  

 






how-to block ads



Member review of AT&T DSL Service


News tagged to this company
more information on the company
Ad-hoc AT&T DSL Service Forum

Reviews:
read 549 reviews (279 positive) (114 negative)
If you wish to review this company, email reviews@dslreports.com
login for new review notification feature
Award!

about
Six Month Rating

Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:


$41 per month avg ($15 to $99)

3 year trend

Review by totalradio See Profile
UPDATED: 24 days ago
member for 2.1 years, 695 visits, last login: a few hours ago


El Dorado,Union,AR
$99 per month (12 month contract)
about 5 days
AT&T
"Speed is steady, very reliable."
"First level tech support is bad, but getting better"
"Works well, if you have no problems"
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)

    Update - 10/26/2009 - Had an issue where I had to call tech support about creating a PTR record for my static IP. First level tech support was able to direct me to 2nd tier support where they could help me. A few emails later, my PTR was setup and smooth sailing.

    08/16/2008

    1st level tech support is VERY BAD. If you demand 2nd tier support, your problem will be fixed in a timely manner by someone who knows what he's/she's doing. If a truck roll is necessary, its usually fixed quickly because it might be "plant related". Been a DSL customer since 2002 (when it was SBC) and it has only failed twice (the first time in 2004 for about an hour, the last being in 2007 for 2 hours, and didn't have to call tech support.)

    AT&T is a real pain when it comes to upgrading ones service. For instance, if you want from dynamic IP to a static IP, they "claim" a truck roll is necessary. This is the ONLY provider that does such a thing...Quite possibly they use this tactic to get the $200 for a truck roll. I've never needed a "truck roll" to upgrade from dynamic to static from any other provider, except AT&T. Word to the folks at AT&T, make it simple for people to upgrade and DO NOT INSIST on a 'truck roll" for something that can be done in the C.O. or elsewhere. However, after 55 minutes (and 3 people) later, I upgraded to Elite service.

    Now on to a bad note...Its my understanding that AT&T is "toying" with the idea of "usage-based pricing". Which is another word for CAPPING YOUR USAGE (or a money grab, call it what you like) ! Word to the wise (from an ex-Verizon employee), this is not a good thing and if AT&T implements this, trust me, MANY people will disconnect their service, and I'll be the first to do so.

    However, I'll keep an open mind on this and see what develops.



    Followup comments:

    Patches

    @bellsouth.net

    Terrible service

    Trying to get in touch with somebody in AT&T technical support is deadly and finally when I get to talk to a human being it happens to be someone from the Philippines, so speaking English as a second language with a heavy accent the same than myself.

    As a result I get nothing except to be infuriated since we don't understand each other.

    The beauties of outsorcing.

    WiFiguru
    Formerly jnethostman
    Premium
    join:2005-06-21
    Lodi, CA

    Truckroll and byte billing

    If AT&T goes to usage billing, I will defiantly disconnect my service from them.

    Good review though, and, I do not know why they charge for truck roll with a static IP subscription... makes no sense at all.
    totalradio

    join:2007-09-15
    ·AT&T DSL Service
    ·Suddenlink
    ·Dish Network
    ·magicjack.com
    ·ipowerweb

    Re: Truckroll and byte billing

    Guess I was a little mis-understood (or was a bit unclear). AT&T tried to charge me for a "truck roll", but I called their bluff when they found out I was an ex-tech. I was attempting to say (and that's my fault that I didn't) that if AT&T insists on a truck roll, don't believe it. Of course, they didn't (and couldn't) charge me for the roll, but its something they might try. They seem to be trying everything else !

    My apologies for not being clear. Totally my fault on that one !

    Memoriallanes

    @ameritech.net

    ATT gone from here!

    To start off, ATT (SBC) has been in this house since it was built in the 1950's. Not no more!

    I have been with ATT first off, dial up and then DSL. The dial up was off line ( due to line problems )almost as much at it was on. Every time they would come out they would say, but sir, its your phone line and we cant touch it, thats ATT's problem. But your ATT, yes but not the phone part. So you get them out and they tell you it is your Modem and they cant work there either. Now that I have had DSL for 15 months, I guess I can say they are worthless.

    The trouble shooters say its your phone line, and the phone guys say its your DSL. SSDD, The trouble shooters had me disconnect my DSL and the static was still so bad you couldn't make a phone call. When the line guys show up they say, you should get rid of your DSL its causing problems for my phone system.

    Best part was when I told the guy that it was also ATT, and his follow up was thats why he has cable!
    ChiTang
    Premium,MVM
    join:2002-08-23
    Alhambra, CA

    AT&T and SBC is the same company

    SBC bought AT&T so AT&T is not a worse/different company than SBC.

    Static DSL is considered as business plan (at least not residential) and it requires a professional install (no DIY install), hence the truck roll.

    People need static IP for various reasons and should pay more, but simply because your "OFFICE" is at home does not imply you can have "business service" at the expense of "residential price".

    My 0.02.

    --
    I used to be indecisive, now I am not sure.
    totalradio

    join:2007-09-15
    ·AT&T DSL Service
    ·Suddenlink
    ·Dish Network
    ·magicjack.com
    ·ipowerweb


    4 edits

    Re: AT&T and SBC is the same company

    I don't know where your "myth" comes from, but it is a myth.

    First, if you already have a dynamic IP service, then upgrading to a static DOES NOT require a truck roll. Only if you need additional wiring (or problems in the wiring) does a truck roll become necessary !

    Second, in most areas, you can get DSL for the first time, and not need a truck roll. AT&T (and most competent carriers) can provision the line within days. In the meantime, they send you the modem, and you can do the rest. Again, if you need some wiring done, then a truck roll is needed.

    Third, I have a static IP at home, so if I have to pay "business rates", then so be it.

    Of course AT&T tried the "truck roll" with me, and I KNEW it wasn't necessary. They did all of the circuit work in the CO and elsewhere, and I rebooted by modem. Works just fine for me !

    Yes, we know AT&T & SBC are the same...PacBell (the old Pacific Telesys) Ameritech (Illinois & Michigan Bell), BellSouth (the old South Central Bell)...They're all one big happy family !
    cprgirl

    join:2002-01-18
    Plymouth, CT

    Yes, AT&T sucks

    Just like SBC and before that SNET. I have had nothing but problems with my connection...they cant fix it. Unfortunately, I have NO cable so I am STUCK with AT&T.

    If I could switch I would....

    DONT even get AT&T if you have the option of someone else to give you internet connection!!!!
    totalradio

    join:2007-09-15
    ·AT&T DSL Service
    ·Suddenlink
    ·Dish Network
    ·magicjack.com
    ·ipowerweb

    Re: Yes, AT&T sucks

    The connection is just fine, just their tech support really sucks. Most of the 1st level folks consider English as a 2nd language because most of them you just can't understand.

    I've had AT&T since 2002 (when it was SBC-Southwest). Had cable before that and it was a real nightmare. Couldn't keep a connection for more than a day and on top of that, they couldn't (or wouldn't) fix my problems, hence I went to SBC.

    After today, I'm looking at DSL Extreme. They come recommended by some friends of mine in California & Oklahoma.

    Bottom line (at least down here), the connection is good, just don't call tech support... I'd rather call my ex-wife...less pain.

    David
    No,there is another.
    Premium,VIP
    join:2002-05-30
    Granite City, IL
    clubs:

    Re: Yes, AT&T sucks

    You could post in the at&t direct forum. I think DNSguy See Profile has been picking these up (rDNS).

    attdslemployee

    @bellsouth.com

    PTR Record Request

    E-mail dnsupdates@bellsouth.net with a
    request to create a PTR record. The e-mail
    should include:
    • IP address to reference.
    • Domain or sub-domain name to reference

    Surfer

    @bellsouth.net

    PTR correction

    that email is for the southeast region. You will need to the PTR record email for the midwest region. sorry for the delay.

    David
    No,there is another.
    Premium,VIP
    join:2002-05-30
    Granite City, IL
    clubs:
    ·DIRECTV
    ·magicjack.com
    ·AT&T Midwest

    Re: PTR correction

    said by Surfer :

    that email is for the southeast region. You will need to the PTR record email for the midwest region. sorry for the delay.
    Agreed, DNSguy See Profile has been doing the ones in the direct forum as of late. I think rDNS requests and PTR are on the same subject or mean closely to the same thing?

    Truthfully I am not completely fluent in DNS (that's what he's here for!) but I think they are.

    None the less post in direct and use the topic [DNS]
    --
    If you have a topic in the direct forum please reply to it or a post of mine, I get a notification when you do this.
    Koetting Ford, Granite City, illinois... YOU'RE FIRED!!
    Forums » comments on review of AT&T DSL Service


Saturday, 21-Nov 05:49:28 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.