Search:  

 






how-to block ads



Member review of AT&T U-Verse


News tagged to this company
more information on the company
Full AT&T U-Verse Forum
Fiber Optic Forum

Reviews:
read 330 reviews (232 positive) (27 negative)
If you wish to review this company, email reviews@dslreports.com
login for new review notification feature
Award!

about
Six Month Rating

Pre Sales Information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:


$124 per month avg ($30 to $264)

3 year trend

Review by vrette See Profile
UPDATED: 362 days ago
member for 9.3 years, 3326 visits, last login: a few hours ago


Lombard,Dupage,IL
$130 per month
about 21 days
"A better value than Comcast"
"Still ironing out the bureaucratic bugs"
"While not perfect, at&t gets it while Comcast doesn't"
Pre Sales Information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)

    My Other Reviews·Comcast
    11-28-2008

    My appointment was scheduled for 8-10 am. Vince the U-verse tech (again, very helpful) called a little after 8 am asking for directions, and showed up around 9 am. Sure enough no one ever came out to check the line, so once again he could not get a good sync, so another ticket was put in. This time a line tech showed up around 10:30 am, and fixed the issue (bad wiring on the pole) in less than 30 minutes. Vince proceeded to hook up the 2-wire RG, and we ran everything (data and IPTV) over the Cat5e cable running though the house. This was a two TV install, and when he hooked up the Cisco DVR and STB, it turned out the DVR was bad, so he had to swap that out.

    Once Vince left, I proceeded to wire up and everything else. First thing I noticed is the SD and HD TV signals are vastly superior to Comcast. I can really see the difference on my Sony XBR4. Internet speeds are right where the are suppose to be (6 down, 1 up) with minimal latency. As noted by many in the forum, the 2-wire has a really strong radio, strong enough that I decided to ditch my N-spec Linksys WRT600N router and just use the 2-wire. Finally, the VOIP sounds great. I can't tell any difference between my old at&t POTS and the VOIP.

    Now the not so great part. I was given a temporary phone number since the department that ports numbers to the VOIP service was not working the day after Thanksgiving. No big deal except that when they did port my number over, they ported it to the wrong number. So instead of xxx-xxx-xx2x they ported it to a non-existent xxx-xxx-xx3x. That left me with no incoming phone service at all. Several phone calls and days later, they were able to restore my temporary number and incoming service. However, now they won't be able change it over to the correct number until the day after X-mas since they want to send a tech out to make sure it is working correctly from inside the house.

    So while I'm not entirely pleased with the VOIP mess-up, overall I'm happy with the service so far.

    11-21-2008

    Not a good start... My install was scheduled between 12-2 pm today for 6 down/1 up Internet, U200 TV with HD, and VOIP. Jason, the U-verse tech showed up around 12 pm. Nice guy, very helpful, and he was really glad to see that I had all the wiring in place. It should have been a quick and painless install. He went out to the NID and could not get a reliable sync, so put in a ticket around 12:45 pm for someone to come out a check the line. The ticket was picked up, but nobody showed. Jason sat in his truck called all sorts of people, but I guess the line techs in my area decided it was Friday, so f*ck it (or me). Finally he got word around 5:45 that no one was coming. So, I took a day off for no reason. I rescheduled for 11-28-2008.

    Followup comments:

    UVERSEOCCA

    @pacblue.com

    LAME.

    I want to tell you how grossly disappointed I am in the Uverse offering.

    First you need to know that I am Senior IT professional and have been in the industry for 18 years.

    I have been dealing with networks before the IP protocol even existed. I was very excited to try the new U-verse product being in the advanced technology field supporting IP telephony and very large data centers for Fortune 500 companies.

    I was very excited to find out that I had 78 Mbs of bandwidth available to my residence from the local SONET MUX. If you don't know what this means then you should forward it to a supervisor who probably will.

    I am very unhappy with the following issues that I'm having with the U-verse product:
    1- Every 19 seconds I have an audio clip is very reproducible
    2- I consistently have issues with the scheduling software not recording a scheduled program. This is not because of a conflict either I'm very aware of the conflicts and how to resolve them.
    3- The fact that I cannot watch more than two HD channels in my entire residence is not acceptable. I understand that not all you U-verse clients will have the available bandwidth to their residence that I do but that should not limit my viewing ability.
    4- The channel lineup and guide is TERRIBLE and has no rhyme or reason as to how it is laid out. There is no "category" search which is available on all other "modern" (and I use the term loosely) video delivery services such as cable and/or DirecTV.
    5- The limitations imposed by a single "whole house" DVR is ridiculous when you have a paying customer who is willing to pay for an additional DVR but your corporate policy does not allow one home to have to DVR's.
    6- Your development team using the Windows CE as a platform for an enormous initiative for your organization? Who made that decision??

    ****Not being able to pause TV on a "non-whole home DVR" is a HUGE omission in your marketing material.
    ****Not being able to schedule a recording from anywhere other than the "whole home DVR"is another HUGE omission in your marketing material.

    I have a Gigabit Ethernet network in my home. You could not have a better candidate for this product and I am very dissatisfied and look forward to hearing from you. I can provide valuable feedback to your organization from an end-user perspective that will help you gain market share.

    I look forward to a response from a manager at some level you can give me some type of a warm and fuzzy and not just lip service like your customer service people on the phone. I know a lot of companies like yours are monitoring blogs.... personally I do not like blogging but if that's what it takes to get some answers I guess I will be blogging away!

    Sincerely,
    Robert

    AT&T NO RESPONSE. NADA.

    Mud5150

    @mchsi.com

    Re: LAME.

    Wow, you sound like an idiot. I love dealing with people who have been in the industry for 18 years because they are all generally as stupid as you.
    Hi, I'm an a-hole who wants to know why I can't do things with your service that you don't offer because I know it can be done because I'm the lord of IT. Why did you use some stupid Microsoft product, no one uses that crap. My buddy Joe has developed this extremely elaborate linux based software that is very technical and no one knows how to use it. It's the best. Why hasn't anyone responded to me. Doesn't anyone know that 2 of the largest technology companies in the world should be asking me for advice via this posting?

    Sounds silly when you really THINK about it doesn't it.
    breezyjr

    join:2003-10-14
    Commerce Township, MI

    Re: LAME.

    Wow, you really sound like an idiot. He complains about the service in general, but makes a few detailed suggestions and you jump all over him.
    I thought his complaints were well stated.
    I thought his ideas were enough that a trained person would know what to do with them....

    Maybe it's you who is the idiot...

    geeze....
    Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse


Tuesday, 01-Dec 22:55:35 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.