site Search:








how-to block ads



Review of magicjack.com (voip)


more information on the company
Six Month Rating

Reviews:
149 reviews (104 good) (22 bad)
Submit a review by email click here
login for new review notification feature

Review by jacobslive See Profile
member for 5.4 years, 101 visits, last login: 40 days ago
lodged 1.3 years ago

  • San Jose,Santa Clara,CA
  • Contract price not specified.
  • "Easy to install, value for money for very basic use, fax capable"
  • "interconnection from other VOIP/PSTN lines, relatively low sound, limited features"
  • "It is very good for very basic call functions"
Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)

My Other Reviews

·Comcast
·VOIPo
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
I have 2 MJ plus and one NetTalk duo. Out of one MJ plus I have ported out one to PhonePower and thinking to port out second one too. I am having difficulty in receiving calls from some of the other VOIP and PSTN lines as they are not able to reach me. They always get busy tone. I have learnt that there is an inter connectivity issue with MJ to and from other service providers. Since I am using MJ for my home business (very bad choice ) and home line, I found this is bit frustrating. Bottom line you get what you pay for. So no complaint but to move on with better options.

MJ wont display your name in out bound caller id, some times it displays "unknown". Some people will not bother to pick up the call if it says unknown unless they remember the number. So it is hard to keep up with calls to people that don't remember your number.

Their website is not user friendly at all. Very hard to get a customer care person on live chat. Only way to get someone to use the "Returns" link. Very tricky

Call volume is pretty low compared to other VOIP services, I believe it's because the compact design (with limited hardware) of their adapter.

If you don't bother the disadvantages of the service, it is a good service for basic players in terms of value for money. Otherwise, not recommended.

Comments:

Thursday, 23-May 15:28:24 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.