Review by Bogtrotter 
UPDATED: 80 days ago
member for 166 days, 70 visits, last login: 1 days ago
 East York,ON
 Contract price not specified.
 "Reliable. Decent sound quality."
 "Expensive. Second-rate in some ways"
 "Good as a backup. But as a main vosp? Much better available for less money."
| Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
I have a callcentric account with about $5 in it which I use as a backup. It used to be my first-line vosp but it got left in the dust when I realized how good voip.ms is.
Callcentric is reliable and sounds good, but it is no more reliable and does not sound any better than voip.ms. It is relatively expensive compared to voip.ms, and for that matter, to many other vosps.
It has decent support and call-handling features; but compared to voip.ms and voipo, its call-handling seems pretty ordinary, even a bit inferior.
I see its advocates trying to turn its defects into virtues by saying how its inferior call-handling just means the engineers at cc are working and testing, testing and working, until they get things perfect. Well, voip.ms showed up several years after callcentric, and its call-handling, sound quality, and general reliablity are about as good as you could ask.
And prices. They are supposedly high because of all that working and testing. Yet voip.ms gives you more for less money.
Maybe tomorrow callcentric will come out with call-handling to equal that of voip.ms (I doubt they can surpass it); but, for now, voip.ms is the easy choice to make. Why settle for callcentric when you can have voip.ms?
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Callcentric |
|
Callcentric
(14)
