republican-creole
Search:  

 
theme to white backgroundlet page decide theme
HomeFind ServiceReviewsISP NewsFAQsForumsToolsDatabaseAbout 






how-to block ads



Member review of VOIPo


more information on the company
Ad-hoc VOIPo Forum
VOIP Forum

Reviews:
read 97 reviews (85 positive) (8 negative)
If you wish to review this company, email reviews@dslreports.com
login for new review notification feature
Award!

about
Six Month Rating

Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:


$12 per month avg ($8 to $18)

3 year trend
Review by myvoip07 See Profile
UPDATED: 1.4 years ago
member for 3.6 years, 796 visits, last login: 123 days ago


USA
Contract price not specified.
"Excellent Call quality, reliability, support"
"None so far"
"Even in beta providing execellent quality"
Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)

    I have been in alpha/beta program of VOIPo for almost 2 year now. Even though Voipo is still in beta the reliability, call quality and support is much better then my previous voip provider. Downtime is non-existence with the exception of only once for me.

    Also the control panel is straight and very simple, way to go.

    Even though VoiPo is still yet to go live i considered it production quality and use as my main provider since it has been rock solid for me.

    Will update the review when the service goes live.

    Followup comments:
    view 1 comment
    stevech0

    join:2006-09-17
    San Diego, CA

    review categories here are sorely lacking credibility

    The review categories here are sorely lacking credibility...

    Years In Operation
    Call Quality
    Features

    The categories as is are more for an DSL connection.
    permalink · 2008-09-20 23:34:52 · Reply to this
    Forums » comments on review of VOIPo

Friday, 04-Dec 22:32:30 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.