Review by MaineMike 
Posted: 90 days ago
member for 5.4 years, 33 visits, last login: 16 days ago
 Portland,Cumberland,ME
 Contract price not specified.
 about 10 days
 "Inexpensive rates."
 "Basic website."
 "Best choice if price is your top concern."
| Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
I have an Asterisk 1.6 PBX running at my home. I had been using a Vonage soft-phone account for over three years, but wanted to switch to a provider that supports BYOD on my primary number.
I tried these four providers: AxVoice, CallCentric, Future-Nine, and Voip.ms.
I thought that all four had similar call quality.
The Future-Nine website is the most basic and I didn’t think it was very easy to use. When ordering a DID number, there was no list of numbers and not even a list of cities.
It took ten days to receive my DID phone number.
Future-Nine does support E911 in my area. They support CNAM inbound, but not outbound.
DID numbers are billed in advance on the anniversary of when the number was established, instead of on the first of the month.
A few times I had to restart my Asterisk in order to receive calls from Future-Nine. I didn’t have to do this for the other providers. There might have been a setting that I needed to change in order to fix this, but I had decided against this provider and didn’t see the need to investigate this.
Future-Nine has the least expensive rates, but I don’t make enough calls for the price difference to be significant to me. I decided against this service because I wanted outbound CNAM support and I didn’t like their website.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Future Nine Corporation |
|
Future Nine Corporation
·