Review by kpmengr - Location: Santa Maria, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- Cost: $7 per month
Call flow is cool! No autorecharge option I am a happy customer
| Web-site: Ease of Installation: Call Quality: Reliability: Tech Support: Value for money:
|
I started VOIP service with Callcentric 4 years ago. Since then I have used Future Nine and VOIP.ms before settling on Anveo. I have to admit I found Anveo's billing scheme difficult to understand at first. I use the "free" incoming and "basic" outgoing service. I used to think VOIP.ms had the most features but I was so impressed with what could be done with call flow, I switched. My call flow screens out spam, forwards to cell if I don't answer my home number (for family and friends), and forwards all calls to cell if I lose login (such as during a network problem). There are many more cool options to implement but this basic flow works fine for now. My only complain is I have been caught unaware when my fund balance ran out in the middle of a call. I wish Anveo had 'autorecharge' billing like Callcentric has.
member for 14.3 years, 19 visits, last login: 7.6 years ago
lodged 10 years ago
emjayef join:2007-11-25 Pleasant Hill, CA Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X TP-Link Archer C9 Obihai OBi200
|
RechargingI think they have notifications for when funds reach a certain trigger point. Not nearly as convenient, but I think they're a pretty small company, so maybe they just can't afford it.
I agree that their IVR call flow is really nice. Most problems I've had with them (I've only been using them about a week) is due to my ATA configuration settings. | |
|
|
|