Search:  

 
 
   IntroISPsISP RolodexIntroLocal ISPsMembersServicesU-VerseFiOSFiOS Soon






how-to block ads



All reviews of ETI Connecting Your World


more information on the company
Ad-hoc ETI Connecting Your World Forum

Reviews:
read 5 reviews (2 positive) (1 negative)
If you wish to review this company, email reviews@dslreports.com
login for new review notification feature
Six Month Rating Unavailable
More reviews are required before ratings can be averaged


»next review in page
Review by (hidden by request)
Posted: 8.8 years ago
(review was emailed from domain lmco.com)


Maple Shade,Burlington,NJ
$83 per month (12 month contract)
Verizon
CLEC party: Covad
"When it was up, it was all good :)"
"Inconsistency....twice removed technical support...Gaps in service :("
"ETI: I think I can, I think I can, I think I can....I could not"
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:

    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

    --Boundary_(ID_NQs2GkW0hRonixw40+IXYg)
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
    Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

    I have been using ETI for 768/384($83 per/1year) ADSL since January of =
    last year. I am 8200 feet from my CO. I went through the regular Bell =
    Atlantic/Verizon garbage to have the loop dropped. Three drop dates, 2 =
    no-show pole monkey's. The third date was met 19 day's after the =
    original appointment. At this point, the Covad tech had already been to =
    the house 2 times. My house is already wired with CAT-5, so no cable =pulling was required by the Covad Tech, I already had the pairs out to =
    my gray box. When he first showed up, he went through the motions, gave =
    me the Efficient 5250 SpeedStream bridge, called for a line test (LOL, =
    said he had to follow procedure even though the drop was not in place), =
    and put in another service call for Bell Atlantic. Bell Atlantic took =
    the scheduled appointment for the following Monday and summarily missed =
    that one as well. Two weeks after that, they actually dropped the line. =
    The connection was not working though, Covad put a hold on the circuit =
    being built after the 2nd missed drop, so I was still not up. Two Days =
    after that they built the circuit, the connection came up. Everything =
    seemed OK except the line speed. I was getting 480/100 speeds on a =
    768/384 line. Many phone calls and one week later, I was told that =
    someone made a mistake and that I was provisioned for a 608/128 line, I =
    did not even know that it worked that way...but whatever. They rebuilt =
    the circuit and my line speeds improved nicely. Every thing was really =
    nice for about a month. 13ms pings to first hop. Clean speed out to the =
    west coast. Then the connection started to flake out. Downtimes lasting =
    4-6 days at a time, really bad packet loss when it was up. Then I was =
    charged for in house cable runs...$150...curiously equal to my =
    rebate....To have that charge removal, I had to go all the way to the =
    president of ETI. It was eventually resolved on ETI's side, but it took =
    me a whole bunch of time and effort to get my money back. Here is where =
    the experience with ETI service comes into play.The lines are Covad, but =
    ETI has always used another company for service through Covad. First it =
    was StarNet and now they have recently moved over to CAIS out of =
    Washington, DC. As you may be able to imagine, tech support in this =
    type of arrangement is nothing less than HORRID. There is one, count =
    that, ONE, point of contact within ETI for DSL support. That person then =
    contacts ETI's service provider, who then contacts the service provider, =
    namely Covad. Outside of the original provisioning problem, my =
    experience with ETI support has been bad. Call's are not responded to, =
    customers just wait for the problems to "magically" correct themselves. =
    The frontline support team is not really able to do anything to help a =
    customer. They do not have DSL on site, so they are unable to even =
    monitor network outages. The tech support lines are populated with =
    tech's who have no knowledge of the DSL setup's because they don't have =
    any direct connections to the networks that the DSL customers are =
    connected to. It is not really the tech's fault, they just have no frame =
    of reference or experience with what problems you may be having. They do =
    a great job on the dial-up side of things, I still use them for dial-up. =
    My mention of dial-up brings me to my current state of =
    service...recorded line speeds of, get this, 10/608 - 17/589 - 100/480 =
    !!!! Those line speeds are about right in practical use as well. I can =
    post files like a demon, but DL's are complete and utter GARBAGE at this =
    time. If my workstation gets 1 in 5 packets, it is a miracle.I have not =
    been unable to send or receive mail using the DSL line since December =
    28th...that was the date that ETI changed over to CAIS. Now let me tell =
    you about the changeover. I was E-mailed the configuration changes that =
    I would have to make. They moved us from a DHCP setup to a static one, =
    or so it appeared. They provided a 172.20.55.xxx IP, a Class C, but =
    unregistered(reserved) range as far as I can glean. They also stated =
    that I must use ETI's DNS servers. This IP works, but appears to be =
    masked at some point. Using dslreports.com/ip, I get a =
    63.220.158.xx(variable- in other words it is DHCP). Now let me pull =
    another rabbit out of my hat....my first hop is in DALLAS. So now, when =
    I do a name lookup, I route through Dallas, Atlanta, Chicago, NYC, DC, =
    and then NJ. Pretty sweet setup isn't it(wink). I have been trying to =
    get my circuit number from them for 4 days now...they still have not =
    returned a call or E-mail. I don't know who to fault in this, ETI or CAIS, =
    but since it is ETI that I pay every month...it defaults to ETI. I plan to =
    jump over to Speakeasy, ASAP.

    All in all, I could not recommend ETI as a DSL provider. They are not =
    really the provider, they resell the reseller's service If you are in =
    the market for a dial-up account, I heartily recommend them

    Greg

    --Boundary_(ID_NQs2GkW0hRonixw40+IXYg)
    Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

    I have been using ETI for 768/384($83 per/1year)
    ADSL since January of last year. I am 8200 feet from my CO. I went through
    the regular Bell Atlantic/Verizon garbage to have the loop dropped. Three drop
    dates, 2 no-show pole monkey's. The third date was met 19 day's after the
    original appointment. At this point, the Covad tech had already been to the
    house 2 times. My house is already wired with CAT-5, so no cable pulling was
    required by the Covad Tech, I already had the pairs out to my gray box. When he
    first showed up, he went through the motions, gave me the Efficient 5250
    SpeedStream bridge, called for a line test (LOL, said he had to follow procedure
    even though the drop was not in place), and put in another service call for Bell
    Atlantic. Bell Atlantic took the scheduled appointment for
    the following Monday and summarily missed that one as well. Two
    weeks after that, they actually dropped the line. The connection was not working
    though, Covad put a hold on the circuit being built after the 2nd missed drop,
    so I was still not up. Two Days after that they built the circuit, the
    connection came up. Everything seemed OK except the line speed. I was getting
    480/100 speeds on a 768/384 line. Many phone calls and one week later, I was
    told that someone made a mistake and that I was provisioned for a 608/128 line,
    I did not even know that it worked that way...but whatever. They rebuilt the
    circuit and my line speeds improved nicely. Every thing was really nice for
    about a month. 13ms pings to first hop. Clean speed out to the west
    coast. Then the connection started to flake out. Downtimes lasting 4-6 days
    at a time, really bad packet loss when it was up. Then I was charged for in
    house cable runs...$150...curiously equal to my rebate....To have that
    charge removal, I had to go all the way to the president of ETI. It was
    eventually resolved on ETI's side, but it took me a whole bunch of time and
    effort to get my money back. Here is where the experience with ETI service comes
    into play.The lines are Covad, but ETI has always used another company for
    service through Covad. First it was StarNet and now they have recently moved
    over to CAIS out of Washington, DC. As you may be able to imagine, tech
    support in this type of arrangement is nothing less than HORRID. There is one,
    count that, ONE, point of contact within ETI for DSL support. That person then
    contacts ETI's service provider, who then contacts the service provider,
    namely Covad. Outside of the original provisioning problem, my experience
    with ETI support has been bad. Call's are not responded to, customers just wait
    for the problems to "magically" correct themselves. The frontline support
    team is not really able to do anything to help a customer. They do not have
    DSL on site, so they are unable to even monitor network outages. The tech
    support lines are populated with tech's who have no knowledge of the DSL setup's
    because they don't have any direct connections to the networks that the DSL
    customers are connected to. It is not really the tech's fault, they just have no
    frame of reference or experience with what problems you may be having. They do a
    great job on the dial-up side of things, I still use them for dial-up. My
    mention of dial-up brings me to my current state of service...recorded line
    speeds of, get this, 10/608 - 17/589 - 100/480 !!!! Those line speeds are
    about right in practical use as well. I can post files like a demon, but DL's
    are complete and utter GARBAGE at this time. If my workstation gets 1 in 5
    packets, it is a miracle.I have not been unable to send or receive mail
    using the DSL line since December 28th...that was the date that ETI changed over
    to CAIS. Now let me tell you about the changeover. I was E-mailed the
    configuration changes that I would have to make. They moved us from a DHCP setup
    to a static one, or so it appeared. They provided a 172.20.55.xxx IP, a Class C,
    but unregistered(reserved) range as far as I can glean.I assume they are using NAT, but I don't know...I don't have any information beyond my new setup instructions. They also stated that I must use ETI's DNS servers. This IP works, but appears to be masked at some point. Using dslreports.com/ip, I get a 63.220.158.xx(variable- in other words it is DHCP). Now let me pull another rabbit out of my hat....my first
    hop is in DALLAS. So now, when I do a name lookup, I route through Dallas,
    Atlanta, Chicago, NYC, DC, and then NJ. Pretty sweet setup isn't it(wink). I
    have been trying to get my circuit number from them for 4 days now...they
    still have not returned a call or E-mail. I don't know who to fault in this, ETI or CAIS, but since it is ETI that I pay every month...it defaults to ETI. I plan to jump over to Speakeasy, ASAP.

    All in all, I could not recommend ETI as a DSL
    provider. They are not really the provider, they resell the reseller's
    service If you are in the market for a dial-up account, I heartily recommend
    them

    Greg/FONT>

    --Boundary_(ID_NQs2GkW0hRonixw40+IXYg)--

    Followup comments:
    Forums » comments on review of ETI Connecting Your World


Sunday, 29-Nov 23:43:40 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.