dslreports logo

Six Month Rating
286 reviews
99 good · 139 bad
Submit a review by email click here

Review by Sr Cardgage See Profile

  • Location: Rio Rancho, Sandoval, NM, USA
  • Cost: $44 per month
  • Install: about 7 days
  • Telco party Qwest
Reliable connection, good speed
Unacceptable equipment, clueless MSN support, no newgroup server
Good once you figure out everything on your own
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:

I am using the Qwest/MSN 640/256 package. I'm only very recently qualified for DSL at my house. The local cable company has been promising internet since last fall but still hasn't delivered, so I was happy to be able to get DSL.

The equipment arrived in a timely manner and the connection was installed on the promised day. I was up-and-running in a short amount of time at about 530/210 (normal losses). Trying to use the installation cd on my second computer always caused the router to lock up. I then realized I didn't need it... the connection was already working on the second computer.

The connection is reliable and the speed is good.

The firewall portion of the supplied Actiontec 1524 is unacceptable. Port forwarding only works when the router is at the "basic" (i.e. wide-open except for NAT) firewall setting. This isn't mentioned in the manual -- you have to figure it out yourself. Why they can't just give us a modem without a firewall that we can't disable (to use one of our own choosing), I don't know.

member for 20.2 years, 27 visits, last login: 18.6 years ago
lodged 20.2 years ago

declr8
join:2004-01-29
99312

declr8

Member

actiontec remedy

ill tell you! the actiontec 1524 does not function properly! it works well as a modem ( wired or wireless) but all the advanced features of the router (firewall port forwarding or dmz hosting do not work! "it will connect" to qwest dsl on either pppoa or pppoe even though the tech"S say NOT! if you want to run a web server or serve online games, this is not the unit you want. however, if you use a secondary router and use transparent bridging you can accomplish all your desires. i have been through three replacements (as i made the mistake of purchasing this (poc)and all three were defective no matter the firmware version. i am using the actiontec 1524 as a modem only bridged to a linksys befsr41 router. the linksys is connected as "pppoe" with qwest dsl and all is happy. the linksys is a solid firewall. i love the USER FRIENDLY firmware.it supports port triggering (for gamers) so you dont have to configure ports each time you serve a game. recomendation ? get a cisco

PalKat72
@cableone.net

PalKat72

Anon

Re: actiontec remedy

declr8,

Could you tell your configuration settings for the befsr41 router and the qwest 1524 modem. I just order the service and would like know the best way to set the qwest dsl modem up as just a modem plugged into my linksys router with little to no complications.

thanks!!

Review by jjipmreza See Profile

  • Location: Vancouver, Clark, WA, USA
  • Cost: $34 per month
  • Install: about 14 days
Reliable so far, free bill pay, MSN 8 has some good features
Tech support can't help setup a LAN
Better than cable for the price and more features too!
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:

Well it started off a little rocky trying to setup a LAN. MSN Tech support gave me information that was incorrect and seemed unknowledgeable. With some research on the web at the Linksys tech site I found good information for setting up a LAN with the router using Qwest. I have the Aerscom 800 DSL modem and a Linksys router. You have to change the IP address of the router to 192.168.1.2 due to the fact that the DSL modem uses the regular 192.168.1.1(I am sure it is the same with any router you use with Qwest). All that work trying to figure it out and it was a few second fix! Oh well it's been up and running good for 2 months so far. I use to have cable since the Excite days but overtime got fed up with the Cap and price increase and the worse was when Comcrap took it over. Rates keep going up and service keeps going down. So I decide to try DSL since they had a good sale for MSN/Qwest for $34.99 a month and this is less than the rising cable company(because you know it's going to go up again!).

They actually give you some nice free features and a somewhat decent browser. Things that an ISP should do for the money you pay them so that if you choose to use them. You also can use any browser you like and don't have to use MSN 8. Speeds are at 538 down / 218 up (promised more but this seems decent considering I have 50ft of phone cord as a temporary line). Have been gaming too much but so far seems to connect about the same as cable. Pages load just as fast as cable and transmission speeds are about half of cable but hey it's $20 cheaper ($34.99 first year) and this works best for me with my new mortgage payment!

member for 20.3 years, driveby review (so far)
lodged 20.3 years ago


Review by jrlittlejr See Profile

  • Location: Portland, Multnomah, OR, USA
  • Cost: $29 per month
  • Install: about 7 days
  • Telco party Qwest
  • CLEC party: Qwest
No charge to cancel
Can't use VPN, or connect multiple computers. What is the point of that??
Service so restricted it is useless!
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Tech Support:
Value for money:

I signed up for MSN Broadband/Qwest service because I was frustrated with the rising prices of my cable modem from Comca$t. Initial price $29.99/month for first year, then $49.99/month. No install fee other than $9.95 for the shipping on the modem. Luckily, I kept my cable modem until I tried the service.

This service simply does NOT do what a DSL connection needs to do. For example:

Qwest & MSN marketing materials state that it is "great for gaming" and high speed connection makes it easy to "work from home". But the Arescom router that they ship SUCKS. Most of the ports are blocked, it will not allow you to connect to a router or hub, and will only let you connect to a single computer. Because it is a router, you cannot use a VPN connection through it. When I discovered this, I called MSN tech support. The guy I got on the phone was a true idiot, and I don't say that lightly. He said "Of course you can use a VPN. I have customers tell me they do it all the time!". I said "Well the tech support pages for Arescom state that MSN has intentionally disabled that feature in the Arescome 800/860 modem used by MSN". Here is the link: »www.arescom.com/Arescom/ ··· Nfaq.cfm

Despite me telling him where to look on the net, he insisted for about 15 minutes that I didn't know what I was doing and that VPN would work. Finally, he put me on hold and "asked a supervisor". He came back on the line after 5 minutes and said "You are right, we won't let you use a VPN."

The other thing was the info on the Qwest website about the service is completely inaccurate. It promises an Actiontec 1524 modem, which includes a 4 port hub and option to expand wireless. »www.qwest.com/pcat/for_h ··· ,00.html

However, this isn't what they shipped, I got an Arescom 860 router. When I asked them to change it, they said that the actiontec wasn't available for MSN customers, only Qwest DSL service with other ISP's.

The only good thing about MSN/Qwest was the installation process and the fact that I could cancel without charge. From order to install was 7 days. I got the modem in the mail, installed the filters, hooked it up and it worked first time. Compared to my prior DSL installs a few years ago (with Phoenix DSL, Rhythms and Covad) this was a breeze. My prior installs took between 30-90 days with multiple phone calls and headaches.

They must now what a piece of crap the Arescom modem is... when I cancelled the service they said I could keep it!

So, if you want broadband ONLY for surfing the web and reading your email from a single computer, this service may work for you. But otherwise it is a waste of bandwidth and $$$.

member for 23.3 years, 128 visits, last login: 13.6 years ago
lodged 20.3 years ago

sherpaboy
join:2001-07-06
Seattle, WA

sherpaboy

Member

http://www.dslreports.com/comment/552/39702

»Review of Verizon DSL by hermosahell

siffniph
@4.42.x.x

siffniph

Anon

Re: http://www.dslreports.com/comment/552/39702

what most people don't seem to realize is that Qwest will blame MSN for the gateway not responding - what Qwest doesn't ever understand is that MSN L1 L2 and Tier 3 DO NOT control, nor do they have access to, the gateway. this is a completely line-related issue when your DSL service goes down, and Qwest is responsible for these issues because your DSL goes through your TELEPHONE line. and guess what? Qwest provides your TELEPHONE line. MSN simply reports the issue. granted there are some agents on the L1 split who should be spanked, but you have evidentally never spoken to a higher level technician. MSN simply figures out the issue, then they report it to Qwest. if you think the service is bad, then you should have tried to get your DSL through Verizon. you would have had more fun :P

Review by msft msn rok See Profile

  • Location: Salt Lake City, Salt Lake, UT, USA
  • Cost: $1 per month
  • Install: about 1 days
  • Telco party Qwest
  • CLEC party: Qwest
microsoft, window's & msn, any ?'s
well, i still have 2 fight traffic 2 get 2 work & home
nah, i won't go there
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:

we operate 4 computer's on a linksys router & msn dsl 800 modem. customer service & technical support was a one call event that took maybe 5 minutes. congrat's to the microsoft corporation along with the msn division. bill & staff, keep up the good work. it's nice 2 have a uniformed isp that know's how 2 make thing's happen & take care of business.

ppl need 2 quit blaming microsoft for everything. we all know how computer/ internet illiterate the general public is in the 1st place. most of u should be thankful u don't have 2 pass a pc test b 4 u can purchase 1. wouldn't that be fun. we would all be out of work then. we won't mention the obvious driver's license issue either.

member for 21.5 years, 188 visits, last login: 20.3 years ago
updated 20.3 years ago


LoveItLive
join:2002-12-21
Normal, IL

LoveItLive

Member

What's your speed

What's your speed?
msft msn rok
join:2002-10-05
Salt Lake City, UT

msft msn rok

Member

Re: What's your speed

1.5mb

Jim F4
join:2001-11-22
Kennewick, WA

Jim F4

Member

Re: What's your speed

Telephone Company Downstream Speed* Upstream Speed*
Bellsouth Up to 1.5Mbps Up to 256Kbps
SBC Up to 768Kbps Up to 128Kbps
Verizon Up to 768Kbps Up to 128Kbps
Qwest Up to 640Kbps Up to 256Kbps

1.5mb from Qwest?

According to msn Qwest only offers them 640k?

Who's wrong?

>
msft msn rok
join:2002-10-05
Salt Lake City, UT

msft msn rok to LoveItLive

Member

to LoveItLive
nobody's wrong, i just know how to keep a computer tuned up.

dont ask
@4.42.x.x

dont ask

Anon

Qwest DSL through MSN

Qwests down load speeds depend on location
they do offer some megabit service but mostly its 640 down 256 up unmetered

XLSoulja
join:2002-08-27
Petersburg, VA

XLSoulja

Member

speed

whats ur transfer rate up and down
msft msn rok
join:2002-10-05
Salt Lake City, UT

msft msn rok

Member

Re: speed

1.5mb but that's already been posted...

XLSoulja
join:2002-08-27
Petersburg, VA

XLSoulja

Member

no i said transfer rate not ur speed connection, transfer rate is how much data it can transfer, mines between 90-92k/s
msft msn rok
join:2002-10-05
Salt Lake City, UT

msft msn rok to XLSoulja

Member

to XLSoulja
it shows 26.5 kb which is what we want it 2 show 4 what we r paying. up is 218kbps & down is 217kbps however, w/ a few tweak's here & there it measure's 1.5mb.

XLSoulja
join:2002-08-27
Petersburg, VA

XLSoulja

Member

ok is that 26.5 for the up trans rate?
msft msn rok
join:2002-10-05
Salt Lake City, UT

msft msn rok

Member

Re: speed

26.5kb is the up

XLSoulja
join:2002-08-27
Petersburg, VA

XLSoulja

Member

whats the down
msft msn rok
join:2002-10-05
Salt Lake City, UT

msft msn rok to XLSoulja

Member

to XLSoulja
i'm sorry, i should have mentioned it is the same, now, figure out your own tweak's from here.

XLSoulja
join:2002-08-27
Petersburg, VA

XLSoulja

Member

the same ?? both up and down ?
msft msn rok
join:2002-10-05
Salt Lake City, UT

msft msn rok

Member

Re: speed

yup, that is...what it show's...
rkilstrom
join:2003-07-16
Layton, UT

rkilstrom

Member

Re: Speed

The $40 a month MSN/Qwest will give 256kbps up and down. I had this for a little while, then switched to 640 down and 256 up.
msft msn rok
join:2002-10-05
Salt Lake City, UT

msft msn rok

Member

Re: Speed

exactly, that is what we started with then we applied the tweak's.

Savesthethrsdy
@wash.qwest.ne

Savesthethrsdy

Anon

Speedy

I'm running MSN DSL in NC through BellSouth and I get probably around 1.5 down and through the webserver I'm running on my DSL line, I have people downloading at about 50KB/Sec. Seems to be pretty good for me, I just wish MSN wouldn't have blocked most the ways of making a webserver. It made me have to work about 10 times as much to figure out a way around it...
msft msn rok
join:2002-10-05
Salt Lake City, UT

msft msn rok

Member

Re: Speedy

i hate it when i actually have 2 think 2 make something work.

Review by Avder See Profile

  • Location: Moorhead, Clay, MN, USA
  • Cost: $49 per month
  • Install: about 10 days
It was faster than dialup...
..but near the end it was dropping all the time, and it was too hard to cancel.
Buyer beware
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:

Since I wrote my original review (below) the service slowly started to degrade. Before I wrote the orignal review it would disconnect maybe once or twice a month. Soon after it was up to once a week, and then soon after that it was several times a day, often while downloading.

I looked at cable a few times, but I didnt like what I saw so I stuck with what I had despite the disconnects.

In the end I kept it until I went back to college and had to move. I called Qwest to kill the line and that went quick enough, but they told me I had to call MSN to actually cancel the internet service. That made absolutely NO sense to me. There should be no reason that they cant communicate with MSN and have everything cancelled.

So I called MSN to cancel and had to wait on hold for a while, and then when I got someone it took them wayyyyyyy too long to bring up the account. After that they made me confirm multiple times that yes, I did want to cancel, and no, I didnt want them to keep my mailbox live for another month and no, I didnt want to purchase 3 months of dialup service. The sales pitches when cancelling is what really got to me.

My advice is that if this is the only thing availible, go for it. Otherwise get something a little more reliable.

Original Review:

Ive had Qwest DSL since June of '00 with few problems. then a month and a half ago I get a letter of final notice (first snail-mail warning or any) that my account will be automatically transitioned to MSN by the end of the month. I'm irritated mostly bacause I hate the Redmond Giant and most everything it $tands for. But I check around and there are no viable alternatives (for me anyway, unique predicament0 I call MSN and say im considering the switch from qwest to MSN and the representative I talk to was very helpful about answering the questions I have (mostly about privacy and that sort) and she reassures me about everything. wit that, I electted to stick with the transition and manually do it myself, thus allowing me to keep a POP3 Email address (hotmail is like..ok I cant print that thought, too disgisting). I recieve my CD about a week later and install it, aftwerwhich I UNINSTALL MSN Messenger..I've never liked that program. .I click the MSN logo thats now on my desktop to connect to MSN and the modem trains up like it always has, but the actual MSN program cant connect because I havnt created a rule with my firewall explicitly permssion the particular program to use any network connections I have. The fact that said program cannot connect so an M$N server doesnt seem to impede the modems ability to connect me to the internet at all, so I now use the DSL connection in my network connectios control-panel in Win2K (I've been connected to the internet for 10 straight days at one point before I had to reboot cause of an MSIE security fix install). I made no hardware changes, and the service seems unchanged. The one complaint I do have is that the forwarding service has not yet taken hold and messages sent to my QWEST mailbox arent forwarded to my MSN mailbox..fortunately I can retrieve them from my qwest mailbox manulayy with outlook yet. And yes, I have allowed the previously said progra mto log-on to MSN so that I would be "officially" transitioned (the last step is listed as logging on to MSN). So far I havnt had any problems except for the unexplained-half-hour-2-times-a-month outages I saw with qwest..obviously I'm using the same servers to connect.

The whole MSN/Qwest partnership looks like its just fancy bells-0and whistles with nothing physically changing at all..so far so good, but after reading a fair share of the reviews here, I'm dreading the day I have to call tech support for something.

Basic stats: Promised speed: 640/272 Actual speed: 570ish/230ish..this is both before and after the switch. Ive had MSN for about 3 weeks now, and so far its good, but im proceding forward with caution.

member for 21.9 years, 1280 visits, last login: 5 years ago
updated 20.3 years ago

DA9811
join:2002-04-19
Chino Hills, CA

DA9811

Member

Just Wait Couple of Months

I think this is the first positive MSN review... but wait couple of months. It's going to happen...slow down!!

gomer1701ems
join:2001-08-23
Minneapolis, MN

gomer1701ems

Member

Re: Just Wait Couple of Months

I think he works for MSN...
Avder
join:2002-05-08
Moorhead, MN

Avder

Member

Re: Just Wait Couple of Months

I can assure you I do !NOT! work for MSN.
jackhog
join:2002-03-23
San Jose, CA

jackhog

Member

You do work for Microsoft!!

I know MSN has an office in Moorhead Clay, MN. You totally work for MSN
Sharkfin2
join:2002-05-04
Farmington, MN

Sharkfin2

Member

Re: You do work for Microsoft!!

I really wouldnt be surprised, I have hardly seen any good reviews for Msn and Qwest, especially from anyone in Minnesota. Qwest, the worst communications company ever, paired up with Microsoft, is not a good combination.
Avder
join:2002-05-08
Moorhead, MN

Avder to jackhog

Member

to jackhog
What, just because I'm not pissed off and ready to grab a gun and go shoot up the people who work at the ISP thats proof that I work for them? You people need to get mental help and realize that sometimes there is someone who actually gets decent service from M$. And I'm fully expecting something to go wrong in the future..the review I gave was based on my experience thus far.

Review by augiedoggie See Profile

  • Location: Spokane, Spokane, WA, USA
  • Cost: $30 per month
  • Install: about 40 days
  • Telco party Qwest
Its DSL. Its available.
Account set up improperly, Not for networked computers, can't send email from legacy addresses
Too secure to be practical. Tech support unsympatheric,slow to discover the problems at their end.
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:

Late November 2003
I have left MSN

Early November 2003. Spokane, WA
Set up Qwest 256 / MSN service. dynamic IP. serving 2 WinXP, 1 WinME on FastEthernet.

Delivery doesn't leave modem because apartment looks unoccupied. Qwest and MSN can't figure how to get another one sent out. MSN says Qwest has to start a new order, Qwest says they did their part, talk to MSN. Takes weeks and a threat to bail to get it cleared up.

I get the modem and set it up.

Can't share the internet between the 3 home PCs, can receive email from legacy accounts but can't send. Hire an independent tech. 3hrs @$65/hr later determined that....

(Problem #1) MSN doesn't support multiple networked-PCs using the same modem. Surprised me since Qwest.net (seprate business account) was OK with it. Our solution was to set up a seperate router. This resulted in

(Problem #2) discover that MSN security features keep you from accessing secure (»...) sites when you access them through the second router.

(Problem #3) According to my indie-tech, MSN forgot to enable POP3/SMTP on my account. When they enabled it, we found

(Problem #4) MSN security features also won't allow you to send email from any account other than an @msn.com. Took awhile to figure this out because

(Problem #5) MSN neglected to initialise the POP3/SMTP capabilities of my account. When I asked MSN tech support to give me a tracking number for this last issue, they couldn't because their customer event tracking system was down. WhenI asked where I should send the bill for the 1.5 hours of tech support I had to pay for due to their not initialising the POP3/SMTP I was given the "1 Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA" address. Riiiight.

I bail in favor of Qwest.net - Takes 5 days for MSN to release the line, another 5 days for Qwest to turn on their service. 10 days of dialup to add to the 40 days it took to get the MSN service. grrrr.

member for 20.4 years, 19 visits, last login: 20.1 years ago
lodged 20.4 years ago


Review by SubWolf See Profile

  • Location: Englewood, Arapahoe, CO, USA
  • Cost: $39 per month
  • Install: about 14 days
  • Telco party Qwest
  • CLEC party: Qwest
Speeds as promised
Connection drop every few days (Possibly Fixed!), port forwarding reset with power cycle.
Not a bad service, and they just got cheaper
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:

I got sick and tired of dial-up, and on the spur of the moment, hit up Qwest's site, and ordered their cheapest DSL package - 256/256, for $39.95/month, no contract. 256k isn't exactly the V8 of broadband, let alone the V6, but it's still 4x faster than 56k, and that's what mattered most.

It took about a week before I saw confirmation on the site that everything was going smoothly, another week and the site proclaimed the service setup "completed", co-inciding with the receipt of my starter package - a DSL1000 modem, plentiful documentation, CD, etc. Hardly a lightning fast response, but acceptable, I'd read for months that getting DSL service can take several days at the least.

Got home, plugged it in, was online within 5 minutes. I managed to avoid installing the entire MSN package - don't need any bloated version of IE to view web pages, just the handy tool. Everything worked great and as promised - happy land!

But, it wasn't all wine and roses. I have two major complaints, which are directly linked to each other - port forwarding and connection problems. I might go anywhere from 24 - 48 hours straight with no problems at all, then out of the blue, the DSL tool reports "Cannot connect to DSL modem", and the only way to fix it is to power-cycle the modem, a restart of the networking system or Windows itself has no effect. I've tried connecting to the modem via USB instead of Ethernet, no change. Could it be the lack of using MSN-IE? If that were the case, why the erratic connection schedule? DSLR's monitoring tool will hopefully give me more statistical data to work with on this issue. I am a Systems Admin for a living, and while I don't claim to know everything, I'm pretty sure that the PC itself is not to blame. Still, there's that small chance that the fault does not lie with Qwest, and I have one friend (in Littleton) who stays connected for several days straight just fine - but, he also uses the MSN Explorer. I'll add any updates as research develops... [* See Update Below *]

The other complaint? Ah yes, the port forwarding, not a huge issue for the general public, but a pain in the backside in relation to the first complaint - when you power-cycle the modem, it forgets any port forwards previously set up. If you want them back, you've gotta open up those ports again, and we're talking up to 50 ports for my needs. There's tools to ease the pain, including a script I wrote myself, but it's still an added task that shouldn't need to be performed in the first place.

Overall, during those times that the service is up - don't get me wrong, it's up and running WAY more often than it's down - the connection speed is as advertised, and for viewing standard web pages, it's more than enough to bring them up fast. With their latest deals ($29.99/month now), the deal gets sweeter. If you can get that kind of price from them with no contract, and you're not a download freak, go for it.

[Update 11-22-03] I noticed the other night, when bringing up the modems' system log, that an error was repeatedly occuring. Unfortunately, I do not have the error handy at this moment, if it resurfaces, I'll post it. This morning, I attempted to perform a firmware upgrade to cure the problem, and I'm currently on the phone to Qwest to see if I can get a 640/256 upgrade for LESS than what I'm paying now - a recent promotion.

[Update 11-22-03 Part 2] Yes, they confirmed the upgrade, I will have 640/256 for the same price ($39.95) - not less, but I'm not complaining. Should be online December 2nd, will watch for disconnects & update as more news is available.

member for 20.4 years, 53 visits, last login: 18.2 years ago
lodged 20.4 years ago


Review by Traek See Profile

  • Location: Kaysville, Davis, UT, USA
  • Cost: $49 per month (12 month contract)
  • Install: about 5 days
  • Telco party Qwest
Cheap and has gotten cheaper since my initial signup; dirt-easy to set up
MSN Hardware is worst available; must buy your own equipment for most adv. services (i.e. voicechat, game servers, etc.)
Not bad if your grandma wants to surf the web or your wife won't let you pay for decent service
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:

I've been with MSN for almost 3 years now, and have never had a outage, never had a problem signing in, and never once had a billing issue/problem. However, if you need to involve their technical support and you are in any way an advanced user, get ready for the longest hair-pulling ride of your life. No one technician is "empowered" to help you enough in any way substantial until you reach Tier 3. Getting to Tier 3 is a bumpy ride at best, but mine involved a couple of letters to the Better Business Bureau. That woke them up!

It's sad you can't get a reasonable level of support by asking, instead you have to get mean. What are they teaching their customers? What are they paying their technicians? My last technician didn't know the difference between RAM and a harddrive... hmm...

member for 21.1 years, 67 visits, last login: 14.5 years ago
lodged 20.4 years ago


wkey1324
@216.254.x.x

wkey1324

Anon

reply to previous post

I know that our tier 3 department are knowledgable individuals. But can you imagine how tied up our tier 3 department will be if you all can just ask to speak to them directly?

Review by edwat See Profile

  • Location: Parker, Douglas, CO, USA
  • Cost: $29 per month (12 month contract)
  • Install: about 5 days
  • Telco party Qwest
Inexpensive-MSN browser -Good Spam control
Tech support -billing support is atrocious
You get what you pay for.
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:

Ordered 640K/640K (dynamic) on line 1 of 2 line home phone. Later I wanted to downsize to 256K and move the subscription to the 2nd line in the house. You might as well have asked England to give up India as a colony. I had to cancel my first service, sacrifice my userid (primary) and start over. That was okay except that I had to give up my primary user id and now have to wait 90 days before it "bleeds" out of the servers to get it re-established. What a crock. And NOBODY at MSN could figure out a way to overcome this. I have spent hours on the phone trying to sort out the userid problem (main email address). I still must wait 90 days. In the meantime I can get all the old userid mail at hotmail. In the beginning I liked the look and feel of the browser. It had that old MAC feeling I was nostalgic for, (will Microspft ever come up with an original idea?). Installation of the modem was a snap. But tech support can be iffy - one call good, another awful. Hold times are LOOONG. Lots of referring the problem to another entity. But, its true, you get what you pay for, so I'm not complainin', I'm just sayin. I am reading lots about how these MSN co-ops with the RBOCs are going sour. MSN is losing money? MSN will soon bail?

member for 20.6 years, 67 visits, last login: 15.1 years ago
lodged 20.4 years ago


html_freak
join:2002-08-04
Ada, OK

html_freak

Member

msn just bailed

Well dude, MSN decided that their dsl would be no more. They are suggesting the best retailer to change to is SBC. I would give them a call and get setup w/ sbc

Review by msecour See Profile

  • Location: San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Cost: $49 per month (12 month contract)
  • Install: about 23 days
  • Telco party SBC
  • CLEC party: SBC
Fast, reliable networked set-up
PLUG HAS BEEN PULLED.
No longer providing DSL service, as of Dec 12, 2003
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:

NEW UPDATE: After hearing that MSN was not accepting new DSL business, they have officially announced the end of DSL to existing customers. Next stop:SBC

UPDATE TO ORIGINAL REPORT: After 8 months of excellent service, MSN has become very flaky this Fall. On occasions I have had to unplug the DSL modem and plug it back in to restore a DSL connection. This used to happen about every 6 weeks or so. Since mid-September it has been weekly, sometimes daily, sometimes several times a day. I was without a DSL connection for 48 hours recently. Online troubleshooting told me to give it a couple of days before contacting service. It came back on just in time. I have down-graded reliability, tech support, and value.

ORIGINAL: For the record, I am computer knowledgeable but non-techie. I may not spend a lot of time at sites like Broadband Reports, but I really appreciate a site like this when I need it.

Going from AOL DSL to MSN DSL probably seems to most of you like going from the sublime to the ridiculous, but I have no regrets. AOL's price jumped over 60%, followed by a trashing of my system by AOL 8.0 and miserable service. Having just had some intelligent and highly productive support experiences with Microsoft (solving problems caused by AOL) I was seduced by MSN 8 during a trial period and made the switch. Most of the 23 day wait from the time of ordering was to allow AOL to release my phone line.

At the same time that I installed MSN DSL, I installed a wireless router for my first home network experience. Being faint of heart, I had a techie friend help. (Well, I watched him do it, actually.) An initial block wall was quickly crumbled by a visit to Broadband reports and some advice by jmanos3 re: NetDSL 800 and Linksys using MSN. Thanks to that tip, my MSN DSL 1000 was quickly functioning for both of my computers. Unlike my experience with AOL, I do not need to be logged on to MSN in order to access the internet. Of course, this is because of the router, not MSN itself. Several other reviews have indicated that MSN DSL cannot be networked and I just want to make it clear that it can.

My tested speed is 643/82. This is quite a bit faster than I had with AOL, and it's cheaper. I cannot answer to behavior with online games because I don't play games. I use the internet primarily for email, research and finance, and I can tell you that I have used this connection for 6 months now with consistent, reliable speed. The only call to tech support was on the day of installation and I thought their support was of average quality that day.

MSN, quite frankly, is far superior to AOL and I don't see how I could improve on my DSL experience at this price.



member for 21.2 years, 75 visits, last login: 9.8 years ago
updated 20.4 years ago


SMCinAZ
Premium Member
join:2000-11-29
Glendale, AZ

SMCinAZ

Premium Member

Why?

Why would you pick MSN when, for LESS money, you could have had PacBell DSL or one of several other providers, and had MUCH better speeds?

digizip-1.5 down/768 up $45-$50 mo.
PacBell DSL 1.5/128 $35 a month
PacBell DSL 1.5/256 $45 a month

A few examples.
msecour
Premium Member
join:2003-01-31
San Francisco, CA

msecour

Premium Member

Re: Why?

The rates you show are not the rates and speeds that were quoted to me by SBC/Pacbell in my area and are not the rates they have on their website:

from SBC:
downstream up to 384 $42.95
384 up to 1500 $49.95
and these figures do not include an MSN subscription.
SBC has a current special introductory rate of $34.95, but that is good only for the first year. Also, SBC told me I would have to transfer my local toll call service to them in order to qualify.

When I compared rates before making my decision, MSN DSL for $18 on top of my monthly MSN price was the cheapest way to go and hold on to the features I was using and enjoying.
[text was edited by author 2003-02-20 16:52:39]

[text was edited by author 2003-02-20 17:04:47]

SMCinAZ
Premium Member
join:2000-11-29
Glendale, AZ

SMCinAZ

Premium Member

Re: Why?

Wrong choice. You are now stuck with slow speeds.
msecour
Premium Member
join:2003-01-31
San Francisco, CA

msecour

Premium Member

Re: Why?

Broadband Reports speed test tells me my download speed "rocks." I would hardly call this being "stuck." Upload speed is not that important to me, and is rated "OK." It seems to me that a bad choice is to spend more for additional speed that is not needed.

SMCinAZ
Premium Member
join:2000-11-29
Glendale, AZ

SMCinAZ

Premium Member

Re: Why?

Dude, you are getting half the speeds you should be getting and paying full price. Bad choice, pure and simple.
msecour
Premium Member
join:2003-01-31
San Francisco, CA

msecour

Premium Member

Re: Why?

If the rates you had given for PacBell were accurate, then yes, I would be overpaying. I don't know where you got your figures from, but I can only go by the information that SBC/PacBell has given me. PacBell/SBC in my San Francisco neighborhood charges the same price as MSN ($49.95 per month) for the SAME speed that I get with MSN. (SBC indicates a speed of between 368kbps and 1.5mbps at that price. The representative on the phone indicated that my speed would probably be about the same as MSN.) They could double my upload speed (but not download) if I went to $59.95 per month. That might be a bargain if I needed the extra upload speed. I don't. Using SBC/DSL and keeping my MSN account would cost me $10 per month more than I pay now for the same speed. To double my upload speed from 128 to 256 and keep my MSN account would cost $20 more per month. For somone who needs the speed that may be a good deal. For me it would be a waste. Do the math. I don't know how you figured that I am paying full price for half the speed. The prices SBC provides simply don't support that conclusion
[text was edited by author 2003-02-20 21:56:46]

kdj
@dsl.lsan03.pacbell.n

kdj

Anon

MSN sucks

Well as far as sbc is concerned, your connetion is based on distance from central office. I'm just down the street from it and the connection speeds I'm getting are very high, close to what they said on the website. I have the plus plan where downloads range min 386 to 1500kbps, but I've never been anywhere close to the slower end. I've always and repeat always connect at anyware from 1100 to just over 1200mbps. I had msn dialup for 7 yrs with no problem then I got their dsl and had it for a year and a half and went through connection and tech hell. I ended up canceling their dsl and signed back up with sbc dsl.

I am much better off now with sbc than with msn dsl.
Bammazon
join:2003-05-07
Milton Freewater, OR

Bammazon

Member

Re: MSN sucks

what site do you go to to check your dsl speed? Like most others im sure you checked it at differant times, at peak times your speed is going to drop (according to the test) when it is always the same on dsl, speeds dont change, but if you test them they will always show up differant. The only way to get a true reading would be to use this method:

To accurately measure the speed of your local link, download a large file (at least one million bytes) from a local server under light load (e.g., Internet software from your ISP in the wee hours) and time how long it takes. When all the various overheads are taken into account, with optimum configuration of your computer (see "Increasing TCP Receive Window") your binary FTP download speed in bytes per second will be about 1/10 of the raw link speed in bits per second (e.g., about 150 KBytes/sec over 1500 Kbits/sec link; about 38 KBytes/sec over 384 Kbits/sec link).

jasonwyrick
@uswest.net

jasonwyrick

Anon

msn is terrible

just want to let others know that my personal experience with msn has been terrible.

everything from very poor service (dropped packets, dns servers going down, etc) to very poor technical support. not to mention the billing is terrible.

i'm currently looking for another provider in the denver area. if others have had good experiences please drop me note.

jason.wyrick@us.ibm.com

-thanks, j

sfcajosh
@covad.net

sfcajosh

Anon

Re: msn is terrible

I use Covad Communications and have been very pleased with their service. It is quite pricy compared to SBC global, my previous ISP, but the extra money goes a long way. I pay $69 a month for one class A static IP address w/NAT and with speeds of 1.5/384 Mb/Kbps. I switched from SBC to Covad after repeated ISP down-time, and poor customer service. In > 6 months, I have not had one minute of down time, which is important for me because I am running a web server. I would recommend checking them out at »www.covad.com. Is for MSN, I have no experience with them so I can not comment on their QOS. ~josh

sfakjsdf
@217.xx.231.charter-s

sfakjsdf

Anon

msncustomers

to all msn customers you are being ripped off. msn pockets your money and gives you half the speed that everyone else provides.