how-to block ads
|
»next review in page
Review by wjtaggart 
UPDATED: 82 days ago
member for 2.8 years, 189 visits, last login: 80 days ago
 Cincinnati,Hamilton,OH
 $30 per month
 about 900 days
 Cincinnati Bell
 "it isn't Time Warner"
 "not constant on. Not dependable (mostly, but not always)."
 "not a proper utility connection."
| Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
I've been a Zoomtown subscriber since it was first offered in my area (Forest Park). I'm equidistant between two COs, at the outer range of each. My speed runs around 1250/530. Occasionally, I call for a speed bump after reading a press release about some tech improvement deal. It is bumped to maybe 1800/500, which lasts for a month, then back down. The only advantage to me is cost. I'd love them to care. In the meantime, they advertise 3000kbps continually. I'm told by their helpdesk that they only "guarantee" 768.
2009 update (waiting for Cincinnati Bell Fiber-optics):
After about 4 tech visits, over the course of several months this Spring, I have obtained consistently, 2560/768. The modem almost never looses connection, but it does, maybe several times a week (briefly). Not Utility quality, which makes it undependable to, say, work from home, which I do once a week. All bets are off during storms -- nothing but repeated redials. Not too bad on good days, though.
CBT just wired an apartment complex about 3 blocks away from me with fibre ("Fioptics"). I'm waiting.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Cincinnati Bell |
 | »next review in page (previous review)
 Review by CableGei
UPDATED: 89 days ago
member for 5.5 years, 1572 visits, last login: a few hours ago
Cincinnati,Hamilton,OH
$44 per month (12 month contract)
about 7 days
Cincinnati Bell
"FTTH 30 Mbps down / 30 Mbps up"
"Installation can take the better part of a day (but well worth it!)"
"Cincinnati Bell FiOptics - Best Broadband Connection in Cincinnati!"
| Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:
(ratings above consensus)
|
Update: 08/30/09
This review is for the FiOptics ZoomTown service, not ADSL ZoomTown. Cincinnati Bell provides their new broadband service over two different platforms depending on where you live -- FTTH or VDSL2. Both are able to acheive the same speeds that they offer. This internet connection is BLAZING! The latency is great, and the upload is amazing! This service blows TWC's DOCSIS 2 Road Runner away!
Original Review of ADSL Service:
I mainly got ZoomTown to compare it to Road Runner. While I found ZoomTown to be pretty reliable and decent for DSL, I didn't really find any advantages to using ZoomTown over Road Runner.
The regular price is $44.95/month. Since I was only getting about 1800/384, I can't say it's a great deal. If you're closer to the CO so you can obtain full speeds, it's not a bad deal, but some other DSL providers are lower in cost.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Cincinnati Bell |
| »next review in page (previous review)
 Review by Angry_Kid
UPDATED: 131 days ago
member for 6.1 years, 777 visits, last login: a few hours ago
Lebanon,Warren,OH
$109 per month (12 month contract)
about 4 days
"Very reasonably priced, fast & reliable connection"
"Not QUITE as fast as TW, but better package deal"
"It's nice to have a choice in cable internet providers."
| Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
It's not "really" Cincy Bell -- it's the erstwhile Lebanon (OH) Telecommunications that was bought by CB. Normally, CB's broadband internet is via DSL whereas this version (i.e. the former LTC) is actually cable. D/l is ~5 MB/s vs TW's ~6, but the u/l is ~800 kB/s vs TW's 350.
CB's on-line storage/webpage offering is equally as poor (nearly pathetic) as TW's -- both charge EXTRA(!!!) to enable ftp access. For free, you get some sad, pitiful, sorry excuse for a 'webpage' **ahem** 'interface'.
The package deal (digital cable & internet) is slightly cheaper than TW, customer service is equally hideous for both. CS is via a local (former LTC) provider, NOT through CB. Amusingly, if you call the main CB customer support and tell them you're having problems with your _cable_, they "correct" you and inform you that their service is DSL. Once you explain that you live in Lebanon, they give you a local Lebanon number to call -- they can't/won't transfer your call.
All-in-all not a bad deal, despite the quirks (don't get me started about their DVR even though it's orders of magnitude better than TW's).
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Cincinnati Bell |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by Mrcincinnati
UPDATED: 184 days ago
member for 184 days, 0 visits, last login: 184 days ago
Cincinnati,Hamilton,OH
$30 per month
Cincinnati Bell
"Reliable, always on interruptions very rare. Call Center/tech support good to excellent."
"My connection speed deteriorated over time 7K Mbs-> 3k -> 1.3 downloads"
"I'm going to try road runner turbo after 9 years with zoomtown"
| Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
I have been with cincinnati bell for 9 years.. I don't recall any problems with the initial install, a tech came by, hooked up a dsl modem and it worked. I had connection speeds up to 11k mB/s down* and 2K up for years. About 5 years ago, this slipped down to 3k mB/s down and 1 k mB/s up. I called tech support and they couldn't improve the speed. (the technician changes some settings in their system). This later deteriorated to 1.3k Mb/s download speeds (700 up) shortly afterwards. I've talked to tech support a few times about this and have tried to disconnect all of the phones in the house, and tightening any connections to no avail. So they haven't been able to improve it.
In all fairness tech support seemed fairly knowlegable and helpful on every call and were also very responsive with help setting up E-mail, POP3 and SMTP etc. I can't say they were bad, I just think I've got a line that is losing quality. Voice is fine, the phones work fine, not alot of noise in the signal. THe copper phone lines could easily be over 50 years old. (cloth insulation twisted solid core wire) It could be the modem, I've had the same one for 9 - almost 10 years now. (Cisco 675) They never suggested replacing that, but I would think the modem either works or it doesn't.
I'll be switching to Road Runner Turbo (TIme Warner) in two days. I'll write another review of my time warner service/ functionality then. Already a little concerned, I have digital cable with time warner and the DVR reboots periodically for no apparent reason. Hopefully that doesn't represent an interupption in Interned connection as well.
So I thought zoomeown was pretty good until recently.
* 11k on some tests with 7k being more normal.
Followup comments:  deejal
join:2002-12-28
Cincinnati, OH | me too I am also switching because zoomtown has really taken a turn for the worse. | |
| | | |
| Forums » comments on review of Cincinnati Bell |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by Heddly
Posted: 204 days ago
member for 1.8 years, 17 visits, last login: 7 days ago
Covington,Kenton,KY
Contract price not specified.
"Technicians were honest about the reason my connect was slow"
"Cinn. Bell would not upgrade my city's Trunk Line when a new one was closer for higher speeds"
"Get Cable with Phone,TV and Internet"
| Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:
(ratings below consensus)
|
I had Cincinnati Bell Zoomtown for 10 years and my internet connection averaged 700-800 download speeds. Technicians who visited my home to test my end of the connection all complained about the old lines that Cinn. Bell were using for my area of the city, while there was a newer,faster and closer Trunk Line available not 1/2 mile from my home.
They all said that my internet connection would double or more if Cincinnati Bell would consolidate the local connections to my city through the newer Trunk Line.
I had Satellite TV at the time but switched all of my Services to my local Insight Cable company and have been pleasantly surprised with all of their content.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Cincinnati Bell |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by jduffy
UPDATED: 275 days ago
member for 3.2 years, 303 visits, last login: 7 days ago
Cincinnati,Hamilton,OH
$40 per month (12 month contract)
about 7 days
Cincinnati Bell
"Reliable"
"Slow, line prone to interference, have to bundle to get $40 price"
"For a few more, bucks a month, Road Runner is much faster"
| Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
I was a long-time Cincinnati Bell Zoomtown subscriber. Gosh, I think it was more than eight years. Zoomtown was reliable, but being a ham radio operator, anytime I used any real power (greater than 25 watts) to my high frequency transmitters, Zoomtown would lose the link. This was a major problem especially when I moved one of my Cincinnati Bell land-lines to VOIP with Vonage. The other issue is the ADSL2 was supposed to be installed over a year ago to take the speed up to be competitive against Road Runner. It never happened. I think Cincinnati Bell is in such bad financial shape over the acquisition and disposition of Broadwing, that they simply cannot invest in their network.
Several weeks ago, I ordered a trial of Business Class Road Runner. 768 up and 6 down. I could also run my own servers for web (I could do this on Zoomtown) and email (I could not run email servers on Zoomtown). Also, RR gives me a dedicated IP address. The price is $59.95, about $20 more than Zoomtown. But ultimately I will move the home phone to VOIP. I am now paying Cincinnati Bell $40 for the Complete Connections phone package now, so when I go to VOIP that will run $25 a month so the net difference is $5.
I gave RR a try while keeping Zoomtown. Wow, what a difference in speed. I mean it is incredible and the upload is a bit faster than Zoomtown. So I had Zoomtown disconnected and keeping RR.
There was one other issue with Zoomtown. Tremendous latency with some websites - click and wait and wait and wait. Many other ZT users said it was problems with the DNS servers.
If I did not have the interference issue and if the speed would have been upgraded, I probably would have stayed with Zoomtown. But ZT stopped being competitive around here against RR, so I got tired of waiting and made the move. I am glad I did.
Now getting almost 10Mbs download and 1.5 Mbs upload with Road Runner. I have not seen anything comparable with Zoomtown. It was worth the change.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Cincinnati Bell |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by JLDunn
UPDATED: 283 days ago
member for 4.3 years, 955 visits, last login: 256 days ago
Moscow,Clermont,OH
$25 per month
about 1 days
Cincinnati Bell
"Good value, No usage limits"
"Too far from CO for highest speed"
"Very pleased"
| Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
Cincinnati Bell's ZoomTown ADSL just came to my neck of the woods in the country and I am finally able to get rid of my HughesNet satellite service. Coming from satellite almost anything other than dialup would be welcome and ZoomTown is better than I expected.
I am too far from the CO to get the maximum speed of 5000kbps but I was able to get connected at 3000kbps. The installer said that at around 10db the connection would start to have problems and at 3000kbps my connection is 15db which should give me plenty of margin. My speed tests in the first few days of use are 2700kbps down and 700kbps up. I had them put in a whole house POTS rather than putting a filter on each phone connection.
I had a wireless setup with a Hughes HN7000S modem connected to a Linksys router and was able to replace both with the Cincinnati Bell furnished Westell 327W wireless modem and the wireless signal is stronger than the Hughes/Linksys setup.
Followup comments: KingofCola
join:2007-02-07
Greer, SC | POTS Splitter JL,
Can you tell what brand of POTS splitter they used? | |
| | JLDunn
join:2005-07-26
Moscow, OH
 ·Cincinnati Bell
| Re: POTS Splitter I did not see a brand name on it but it was small enough to fit in the small telephone connection box on the side of the house. The small filters they give you to connect to each phone connection when you do not have a whole house POTS installed also do not have a brand name on them but they do say made in China.
--
Cincinnati Bell Zoomtown ADSL | Westell 327W | Win XP SP3 | | |
| | | |
| Forums » comments on review of Cincinnati Bell |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by mAlfunkti0n
UPDATED: 294 days ago
member for 5.9 years, 305 visits, last login: 58 days ago
Loveland,Clermont,OH
$30 per month
about 4 days
"Fast, stable service. Cheaper than RR, faster than RR. Upload is great."
"None so far"
"Head and shoulders above RR."
| Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
Time Warner recently started slowing to far beyond unacceptable levels. I called their support line several times but nothing was being done. I had the 15Mbit service, which DID work really well for quite some time. Recently, even during non peak times the service had been around 2-3Mbit. I got tired of the run around, and the "retention" department calling me a liar when I tried to get their lower tier service price matched to Zoomtown. Enough was enough, I called Cincinnati Bell, had the service installed and receive great speeds and service.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Cincinnati Bell |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by SainterThom
Posted: 318 days ago
member for 4.5 years, 7 visits, last login: 5 days ago
Maineville,Warren,OH
$33 per month
about 1 days
Cincinnati Bell
"For Lebanon area, faster than Road Runner"
"Not a DSL package...in Lebanon it's cable, and all the problems cable has carries over"
"I wouldn't go back to RR for anything...if only ATT would come this far south..."
| Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
Speed is excellent and as advertised... Was promised 8.0 mbps, expected 6.5, got 7 out of the box with no tweaking, on a wireless connection no less! Install was quick and the tech was gracious although he said that he used to be a TWC contractor; so he had experience to fall back on. Interesting that the phone company used an MTA and is using VoIP technology, but I guess it makes sense since they bought the LOCAL cable company (non-TWC).
All in all, if you live in Lebanon, you have a choice between Embarq (Blech!), TWC, and Cincinnati Bell. I don't recommend counting out CBT based on what goes on everywhere else, becuase it's different here in Lebanon. TWC gives the lowest prices in Southwest OH to Lebanon, and CBT beats it by about 10 bucks a month (for video, internet, and phone) but the cable tv service is not as professional. So that should be your factor. If you're looking for the best speed without paying a premium for business class or "Turbo" service, CBT is the way to go!
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Cincinnati Bell |
| »next page (previous review)
Review by toolman90
UPDATED: 321 days ago
member for 2.3 years, 47 visits, last login: 39 days ago
Cincinnati,Hamilton,OH
$73 per month
Cincinnati Bell
"has reliable connection and speed for the price"
"very bad tech support and could be faster"
"It is a good service for the price and I would recomend it"
| Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Services:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
I recently hooked up to zoomtown had no problems setting up the equipment. It worked great when it was up and running.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Cincinnati Bell |
|
|
·
·
·
·
·