dslreports logo

Review by JehCT See Profile

  • Location: West Hartford, Hartford, CT, USA
  • Cost: $22 per month
  • Install: about 2 days
Excellent voice quality. Fast-booting Sipura adapter. Easy install.
None.
I canceled three Vonage lines, and switched to BroadVoice
Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:

2/25/05 Over the months I've experienced occasional loss of audio on inbound calls. in the most recent incident, customer service responded very quickly. I have four BV lines. The phone and fax via SPA2100 work flawlessly all the time (the fax on line 2 as a BYOD device). My Xten softphone works perfectly. Only the SPA1001 has been giving me trouble. I am thinking about replacing that device with another SPA2100. Maybe this is the source of the recurring problem. Perhaps BV tech support should be more proactive about replacing funky adapters.

10/23/05 I emailed BV customer support because I had one way audio on calls simultaneously ringing to my alternate numbers, and me main extension was dead. Within a day they came back and said that my line was working correctly, that I must have a connectivity problem. This upset me, because I knew my network connection was working fine. Then I discovered that one of my telephone cables was unplugged. As soon as the phone had a proper connected to the ATA, everything worked smoothly. BV needs to have a thorough online troubleshooting process that starts with "Make sure all your cables are plugged in..." My call quality continues to be perfect,. and I enjoy all the features.

I've been using BroadVoice for five months over my Comcast dynamic IP connection, and have been completely pleased with it. I recently added two more lines, and cancelled all of my service with Vonage.

The main difference between BroadVoice and Vonage is that BroadVoice costs less, provides better features, and supplies better equipment. BroadVoice allows simultaneous ringing of ten numbers. Vonage only allows two. My BroadVoice plan costs less, and includes calling to Europe. The BroadVoice adapter boots up much faster than the Vonage adapter, and seems to perform better when my network connection has traffic.

Customer service at BroadVoice is good. I called them because I needed help running two lines on my BYOD Sipura 3000 router. They answered the phone within a few minutes, and e-mailed me the instructions. With my first BroadVoice supplied Sipura adapter, installation was exceedingly simple and fast.

With BroadVoice, the voice quality is uniformly excellent. I have very rarely experienced dropped calls, and those few I blame on Comcast, because my Internet drops out once in a while. I'd say 99% of my BroadVoice calls complete successfully. When we were with Vonage, my wife was complaining all the time because her line would not work. WIth BroadVoice, she has no complaints whatsoever.

I've been running a fax over one of my BroadVoice lines, and it works perfectly. This is not a supported feature, but if it works, why not?

member for 18.9 years, 11 visits, last login: 18.1 years ago
updated 18.1 years ago

mathfaster
join:2005-09-23
Upland, CA

1 edit

mathfaster

Member

Questions

I've seen other posts for other voip providers where Caller ID name works sporadically. How reliable is Broadvoice for this feature? I currently have Vonage and Broadvoice listed features look pretty complete. Did you port your number to Broadvoice? If so, how did that go? Broadvoice's BYOD lite for $5.95 with 100 minutes/month looks very attractive. I find it interesting how your experience with two providers can be so different given you've kept your same ISP. So far for the month I've had Vonage my reliability has been great. I'm going to give Vonage a year before I start comparing voip providers again. Broadvoice does not have local numbers available where I live at the present time but in a year who knows.
JehCT
join:2005-05-01
West Hartford, CT

JehCT

Member

Re: Questions

Number porting with BV is not smooth, yet. They still have a manual process. I got new numbers from BV, and let Vonage keep my old numbers. It got rid of a lot of cold callers (LOL). Anybody who knows me can find my web site and current number.

Caller ID on BV seems to work fine for me. I haven't noticed any problems. I use BV to sim ring three different phones (including my cell). Caller ID is good at all of these locations.

I have the $5.95 lite plan on one line. I am using Port 2 of my BV supplied SPA-2100. It seems to work fine as a fax line, even though they don't officially support this configuration.

My problem with Vonage was the really old and crappy ATA's the provided me. Maybe Vonage is fine, but the adapter was slow to boot and just seemed unreliable. BV uses Sipura devices, that work better all around. BV has an open network, so you can choose the best SIP device and use it. Vonage is also very expensive.

Review by brucenolan See Profile

  • Location: Ramona, San Diego, CA, USA
  • Cost: $12 per month
  • Install: about 3 days
quick order fulfilment, easy install, voice quality
none yet
BV works great
Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:

I tried vonage first ordered their 500 min/mo plan and it took 15 days and 3 phone calls before I received equipment!-- Broadvoice, I ordered online and had equipment in 3 days, plugged it in and its worked since. two weeks now and works great have unlimited instate. sent vonage stuff back, granted, vonage worked great also but I can call out of state with my cell phone on weekends, I just wanted more local time and broadvoice fit the bill fo $5 less/mo and just FYI both of these VOIP are done over wireless 900 MHZ link at 6 miles from my ISP, and both work fine. tried it over my soon to be disconnected Direcway--forget it

member for 21.8 years, 1358 visits, last login: 35 days ago
lodged 18.3 years ago


Review by dg3274 See Profile

  • Location: Lynnwood, Snohomish, WA, USA
  • Cost: $10 per month
  • Install: about 4 days
In-state plan, easy to setup, low priced service
More outages then most other providers, substandard call quality
You get what you pay for
Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:

I signed up with BroadVoice in November of 2004. At the time they were (and may still be) the only provider to offer an In-state plan. It's $9.95 per month with calls out of state costing only 3.9 cents per minute; a great deal for someone like me who only calls primarily within my state.

It is now October 2005 and I have left BroadVoice and signed up with Sunrocket. I could no longer tolerate the poor quality of service that BroadVoice was providing me with. This is one case where I truly got what I paid for. As far as I know, $9.95 per month is as cheap as it gets for VoIP with unlimited In-state calling. Well, now I know why other providers charge more. They actually provide you with SERVICE!!

At least once a week during the time I had BroadVoice I experienced some sort of problem with my service. Be it partial service (Outgoing works, no incoming), no service at all, dropped calls, or just plain crappy call quality; there was always something going wrong with the service. Since I'm a lazy bum and didn't feel like searching for another provider I just stuck with them for awhile since the service was so cheap. Besides, my cell phone was doing fine for when BroadVoice left me hanging. Well, it finally got so bad recently that I had to search out another provider. And that provider turned out to be Sunrocket. So far Sunrocket has been flawless for me. Their unlimited nationwide plan is only a few more dollars per month and the service is much better. When the time comes I will submit my review for them as well.

So the bottom line stands. You get what you pay for. While BroadVoice may be dirt cheap when it comes to VoIP prices, the quality of their service is just plain dirty. I can only hope that Sunrocket doesn’t turn out the same. We shall see!

member for 24.5 years, 2541 visits, last login: 1.1 years ago
lodged 18.5 years ago


Hampy Camper
@reonbroadband.com

Hampy Camper

Anon

BroadVoice has been fine for me

My experience with BroadVoice has been smooth, with few exceptions. I can't help but wonder whether you've got an ISP problem. Did you test the quality of your broadband connection?

dg3274
join:1999-10-12
Lynnwood, WA

dg3274

Member

Re: BroadVoice has been fine for me

I've tested the quality of my connection MANY times over the years. I even have a monitor setup with DSLReports too. My line is top notch with 0% packet loss and very respectable ping times. Like I mentioned in my review, I've had Sunrocket for quite a few weeks now with no problems. Trust me. I'd know if something was wrong with my DSL connection. I'm a very network savvy individual.

Review by tkulyk See Profile

  • Location: Buffalo, Erie, NY, USA
  • Cost: $12 per month
  • Install: about 2 days
Talk Quality ok, Powerful Web based comtrols
intermittant occasional outages, forget LNP
A unbeatable value
Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:

I have had Vonage and Packet8 before and decided to give Broadvoice a try. I find the talk quality to be as good as any of the others I've tried. I took advantage of the BYOD offer and the Broadvoice tech support was very helpful in getting my Vonage Cisco ATA configured for use on thier system. I have seen alot of negative remarks about the Broadvoice tech support, but in the few instances I've had to call them, I've either gotten right through or through in a reasonable amount of time. I did however email them once and received no response. Talk quality has ranged from superb and has been a little choppy on a few occasions but those instances are rare. Generally I am satisfied with the talk quality. Thier web based controls are as powerful as I have seen yet, thumbs up on them. I tried to get my number ported and its been 11 weeks so far with no success, so I have given up on that ever happening. In summation, Broadvoice seems to be a pretty unbeatable value. I recommend giving it a try.

member for 18.5 years, driveby review (so far)
lodged 18.5 years ago


Review by hkvalet See Profile

  • Location: Las Vegas, Clark, NV, USA
  • Cost: $22 per month
Good Voice Quality, save $$$ for my phone bill
No Local Number Portability
Good Value for money
Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:

Update: 10/4/2005
Just cancel the service. Bad quality when calling to Hong Kong. Usually received error message "Sorry, you canll cannot be completed at this time, please hang up and try your call again." E-mail technical support but no response, call technical support and the tech said he would send the ticket to the enginneer. But no change at all after a month, so I decide to cancel it!!!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
1/3/2004

After giving up Lingo, I considered to try BroadVoice. I bough the SPA-2000 in Voxilla. It was $79.95 and came with a great BroadVoice coupon. The coupon waived the BroadVoice $9.95 activation fee and even gave me a free month of service.

The registration process was less than five minutes. I typed in the coupon code and all other required information. I was even able to pick my new phone number. Since I chose the BYOD, it took me five minutes to configure the device to receive dial tone. The device is locked by them initially, but I called the CS and requested the admin password, and received from them right away!

The voice quality is excellent. I call mostly to Hong Kong. It only takes a few seconds after I dialed the phone number plus a “#” to ring the other parties in HK. It works much better than those pre-paid calling cards. I like it so much!!! I already use 800 minutes since I installed the device. (12 days ago) And I really hope that it’s really an unlimited service because I will probably hit more than 3000 minutes by the end of the month.

I tried to place a conference call that across two oceans – U.S. -> Hong Kong -> U.K.
The sound quality was not very good, but was acceptable.

Some users report that BroadVoice Customer Service is very hard to reach. But guess what, the only time I needed to contact them was the one that I requested the admin password for my device.

They always say COMING SOON, but I don’t really know when they are going to provide LNP, or if they will actually provide this service.

member for 19.5 years, 248 visits, last login: 17.5 years ago
updated 18.5 years ago


Review by nguyen27 See Profile

  • Location: Quincy, Norfolk, MA, USA
  • Cost: $22 per month
  • Install: about 1 days
Price
Customer call taking a long time/number porting.
Good price, but don't think about porting your number
Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:

So far my experience with Broadvoice is good, call quality is pretty good, web portal is nice, but calling customer is taking forever, if you can get thru. One thing that I would like to forwarn potental broavoicer, it tooks me nearly 3 months now, and porting my number is no where near done, and keep getting we don't have any further information because the porting department is not giving any information regarding the port every time I call.

Finally drop service from Broadvoice as I'm trying to ports my number and after 4 months and look like they never bother to sent out the request to Verizon for porting because I called them up to cancel the LNP, and then sign up Vonage with LNP, and Vonage done porting in exactly 10 days.

member for 20.9 years, 1248 visits, last login: 5.3 years ago
updated 18.5 years ago


Chrisssss
@patmedia.net

Chrisssss

Anon

broadvoice issues

im having the same problem but only longer, Ive requested them to port my number 4 months ago but, i never got any response. well? the hell with it! they got great service and no other carrier gives you that many countries such as ireland unlimited! not a bad deal. just dont call for cust svs & porting of your number and you'll be square. until i find another carrier that does the same option i have no choice no to leave.

Review by rcilink See Profile

  • Location: Manchester, Hillsborough, NH, USA
  • Cost: $5 per month
Bolts-up to Asterisk nicely..
forget about LNP
the BYOD lite plan is good for Asterisk
Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:

I decided to get the BV Lite (BYOD) plan for my Asterisk box. Mostly because the incoming calls are unlimited (no per minute charge). Outgoing calls are routed through other providers, so the BV bill is constant $5.95 + tax and fake tax.

Getting it setup with Asterisk is not as bad as some of the other providers. They offer the credentials on the web and have a sample Asterisk config script posted.

Currently, I have one BV BYOD Lite account with a virtual number (2 total numbers). They ring into the same context.. I did not care to test if it will distinguish the lines on incoming calls. I also have a second BYOD Lite account with just one number. After a little tweaking of Asterisk, I succeeded in getting both login accounts registered on my Asterisk box..

I know a lot of people had a bad taste with these guys in May 05, but it appears to have settled-down lately and the calls seem to work. One time in September 05, I experienced a one-way audio.. I noticed someone else had this problem, so I did the professional thing: I waited, and it fixed itself. (I guessed it was something BV tweaked..)

One big weakness of this company: LNP. If you have any intention of 'porting' you rnumber to them, just give up prior to asking them to start it. I submitted the paperwork in April 2005. It is now September 2005. Nothing. They have a record of my submission, and are blaming Global NAPS of holding it up. They made no effort to follow through with GNAPS to solve the problem. So, dont waste your time on LNP..

If you are considering them for international calling plans, please look deeper into them. I have no experience with them for any calls out of the USA. I believe it was on the Broadvoice forum at Voxilla.com that several users have pointed out that BV will selectively change your account to 'business' and back-charge previous months. If International calling is your reason for looking at them, make sure you either use a 'prepaid' credit card, or one of those virtual credit cards that you put only enough to cover your monthly bill. That way they can't put a $200 charge on you without talking to you first.

member for 20.3 years, 4752 visits, last login: 210 days ago
lodged 18.6 years ago


DaveMudra
@charter.com

DaveMudra

Anon

Broadvoice LNP problems

I have been with Broadvoice for NINE (9) months and they still have not ported my old phone number. Their website promises that most will be ported within 30 days but that is not my experience. Furthermore they tell me that this is out of their hands and can not offer me any idea if and when this will happen. Very frustrating.

Review by slicemaster See Profile

  • Location: Newbury Park, Ventura, CA, USA
  • Cost: $24 per month (month by month)
GREAT CALL QUALITY, Helpful technical support (longest I have been on hold has been 10mins), Low cost (aka best value), BYOD!
None so fare - Recent calls to support have had very low hold times (e-mail support is a joke though)
Great service, Great value, Great account options---Basically worth a try!
Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:

Well, I have only been with BroadVoice for a short time but during this short time my experiences have been fabulous. I actually signed up for the Unlimited World Plus BYOD plan and activation was free because I bought my Sipura SPA-841 IP Phone from »voxilla.com/ . Voxilla includes a coupon when you buy any Sipura product that will get you signed up for nothing (zip, zero, nada) plus the first month FREE! Anyways, I am using my BroadVoice service with a Sipura SPA-841 IP Phone. I provision the device myself and it works great. I am running their service over my Adelphia cable modem and I have never had any problems (I have a dynamic IP if anyone wants to know but it doesn’t change all that often, probably once every couple of months). I have also used my phone in hotels, friend’s houses, school, etc. and I have never had a problem (my phone is configured to receive an IP address, DNS, gateway, etc. via DHCP so I can basically go any ware and plug into any network and get service). I have made calls all over the US and have had no problems. Ordering the service was super easy and setting up my Sipura IP phone wasn’t that hard either. My experiences with this company have been nothing but delightful so far and I look forward to using them for the years to come (I will post updates to this review every once in a wile). I would highly recommend giving BroadVoice a try, especially with the use of your own SIP device; it is really cheap that way. Anyways, every thing is running smoothly and I am quite satisfied with the service, the quality of the calls are actually better then with my regular pots line. Well, that’s about it, nothing but good to report. I’ll keep you forks here posted in regards to my continued service.

Later,

Slice

::UPDATE::

Well, I have had BroadVoice for a few weeks now and I am still extremely satisfied. I have not had any service outages and every thing has been running smoothly. Anyways, this update is to inform you of BroadVoice’s international calling services. I have to say that every international call I have made has been superb! The connections were fast and actually had better quality then my POTS line. I called Sweden and Estonia and all calls were crystal clear. I have the Unlimited World Plus plan so calling to Sweden is free, while calling to Estonia is very cheap. The connection was the best I have ever had to Europe and I am ecstatic at the high quality connections that I can’t even get with my pots service.

Slice

::UPDATE:: (5-3-05)

Well, I just had my first outage (the outage was only partial though, incoming calls work perfectly but outgoing calls are spotty). I however do not blame BroadVoice for the outage because it seems to have been a bad day for all VoIP providers. According to »Sipsource.com , BroadVoice was not the only VoIP provider afflicted as major outages were reported from Voice Pulse, Vonage, ATT CallVantage, and Packet 8. BroadVoice is aware of the problem and currently has engineers working on it. It probably is a switching problem IMHO. Anyways, just thought I’d let you forks know. But like I said I don’t blame BroadVoice for the hiccup as it is probably a switching sub station problem that has screwed up most of the providers, not just BroadVoice.

Slice

::UPDATE:: (5-9-05)

Well, the service outage is over and service has been restored (after 6days). It is actually better then ever. I am very satisfied and I am going to stay with BV. I attribute the outage to growing pains and that’s about it. But like I said, the service is back up and running better then ever.

Slice

::UPDATE:: (5-19-05)

Well, my service has been restored for quite awhile now and I am happy that the outage is over. I am currently experiencing some intermittent audio problems but I have concluded that this is because BV is still tuning their systems after the software upgrade and new currier changes. I am completely satisfied with the service and I am excited that they are back on track. I think BV could have handled the outage better however I am just happy that this type of outage probably wont happen again. I have been noticing that a few other providers have been reporting downtime recently so that just goes to show you that VoIP is still a new technology and is not to be relied on 100%. Some people here obviously made the mistake of VoIP as their only means of telephone communication and they seem to be the ones huffing and puffing the most. I think most people under stand this concept but some seem to have just missed the boat on that note. There have been plenty of useless rants but I think things are finally settling down so I expect it to be smooth sailing. Just to clarify, my service is working great and word is that BV actually supports some new codecs so that is also a welcome addition for some.

Note: BV obviously took a rating hit due to the recent outage and the way they handled it, and I think this was completely warranted. I do however expect those who reduced their rating to bring them back up when the criteria has been met.

Slice

P.S. At this point I can’t in good conscience recommend BV to anyone due to the recent outage and how they handled it. I however also understand that these things do happen to all providers so I am a little more forgiving then others. I also see BV making a quick recovery in service so in a few weeks I will reevaluate the service and reconsider my stands as fare as recommending them. The service right now is great and as long as it continues on its current path I would have no problem recommending them again in a few weeks.

::UPDATE:: (6-2-05)

Well,

Service has been improving and so I have to comeback here and update my ratings and review. Ever since service was restored after the outage, the service has been more and more reliable. Voice quality is also going back up. I have only experienced a few hiccups (issue with voice mail and calling to Canada, nothing major) since the outage and those have been resolved very quickly.

Signed,

Slice

P.S. at this point I still can’t recommend them because I feel it is too soon to do that. Even though their service is good I feel I need a little more time to solidify these updated opinions.

P.P.S. BV got the shaft on the ratings recently and this was called for because the service level we as customers received during the outage was just plain horrible. However I think some of the more angry users are purposefully giving BV the shaft because of their own anger rather then actual recent service state. I would challenge all those who have yet to update their reviews to do so because many of the reviews posted now are just not accurate according the current service state.

::UPDATE:: (6-11-05)

Service is great; I have not had any major issues with BV since service was restored after the outage. Support has been extremely helpful and the service it self has been extremely reliable as of late not to mention the superb voice quality. BV is on the come back and I look forward to this type of quality of service for years to come. People have just been too hard on BV; it is also ironic that people have not been as hard on some of the other providers that have been experiencing issues recently. Anyways, I am almost confident enough to start recommending them again but I will wait to the end of the month before I will give that my stamp of approval so to speak.

Slice

::UPDATE:: (7-27-05)

Well, QoS has greatly improved since my last update, and so has call quality. I am currently overseas using my BV line via a laptop with Xten Lite (a popular softphone) and a USB handset over a wireless Internet connection. It works great; it is definitely saving me a ton of cash on what would have been a huge bill if I didn’t have BV. Anyways, I am using the DCA proxy and have had great success using my BV service from Sweden, Estonia, and Norway, as those are the countries I have been visiting (call gets a little digitized sometimes according the some call recipients but I know that is due to the wireless internet connection and increased latency of the long roundtrip to DC). Anyways, I am extremely happy with the service and look forward to further improvement.

Slice

P.S. Customer support via telephone is fabulous as the people at CS are always friendly and eager to help (recent calls to CS have resulted in 30sec-3min hold times); however, e-mail support could use improvement.

::UPDATE:: (7-28-05)

Well, I didn’t state it above but I am also traveling with my SPA-841 (Sipura hardphone) in addition to my laptop softphone combo. This has enabled me to have the greatest flexibility based on whether there is a data port (hardwired internet access via Ethernet) available or just WiFi. Anyways, the hotel I am staying at has a data port so I decided to give the SPA-841 a try to see if it made any difference in call quality over my laptop softphone combo, and man was the quality better. I am attributing this to the fact that the SPA-841 is hardwired and therefore has decreased latency and less packet loss when compared to even the best WiFi links. Anyways, the call quality is much better (for both the caller and callee) when using the SPA-841; it is simply amazing what hardwiring can do for quality. Call quality over WiFi and my laptop softphone combo is good (some digitization once in a wile on the call recipients end) but wile using my SPA-841 it was flawless (ZERO digitization for either parties). The people I called said that the quality when using the SPA-841 was just like talking face to face with fantastic voice dynamics and depth wile they said that when I was using the laptop softphone combo over WiFi they said call quality was that of a decent to good cellular phone call. Either way, I am happy, and I just though I would report the quality difference that I have observed wile using both WiFi and hardwired Internet access, as well as softphone to hardphone differences.

Slice

P.S. If anyone wants to know I have been using the G. 711 codec on the proxy.dca.broadvoice.com outgoing proxy.

::UPDATE:: 9-4-05

Well,

Overall service has been very good. No outages as of recent and better voice quality. Pretty much what my last update was saying. But for all those who say I have been to kind to BV here is a list of things I am either still affected by or am concerned about. First is the fact that BV has still not been able to bring all their proxies on line in a fully operational state. The only proxies that are fully operational are DCA and MIA (last I checked). I would like to use LAX but important features such as call transfer and caller id with name are still not working on LAX(thank goodness they got the DTMF issues fixed). This is just bad business, it does not affect me because I can use DCA just fine but why have more then one proxy if they aren’t maintained properly so that they all function properly? It is just stupid. I just wish they would fix them, and there is no reason why they cant, they just need to dedicate the resources and do it. Next would be the fact that their e-mail support and engineering ticketing system response times are terrible (I for one filed a trouble ticket about the LAX proxy and I have still not received a response months later). I want to be clear, BV is not perfect based on the above complaints but in my honest opinion they deserve a chance, and for me they have been great. I also stated in earlier updates that my international calls are crystal clear and are actually better connections then I can get on my Verizon pots line and this is still true to this day. Service is great now even with the proxy fiasco that I described above. I would have no problem recommending them; things can only get better if they get their other proxies online and fully operational.

Signed,

Slice

member for 22.3 years, 166 visits, last login: 14.8 years ago
updated 18.6 years ago


Elcabong
Cuba SI, Castro NO
join:2000-03-09
Philadelphia, PA

Elcabong

Member

Same Experience

Yes- I have Broadvoice and it's worked great with my SPA3000
adapter. I've only had one problem connecting when they were upgrading their website account portal last week. I call Italy and the voice quality is the same as cell phone or better. All local calls and state to state are the same as pots. I also did the byod and unlimited world account and everything is fine.

altora
@204.52.x.x

altora

Anon

They wont survive the manadatory 911.

Broadvoice can barely keep their service up, much less comply with this 911 decision from the FCC...

»www.techknowtimes.com/?p=21
slicemaster
join:2001-12-14
Newbury Park, CA

slicemaster

Member

Re: They wont survive the manadatory 911.

said by altora:

Broadvoice can barely keep their service up, much less comply with this 911 decision from the FCC...

»www.techknowtimes.com/?p=21
Think what you want, only time will tell

RRedside
@sea1-4-5-053-135.sea

RRedside

Anon

Broadvoice service outage

Have had BV service for 4 mos now, and for the 1st 3 of those it was pretty good (except for some initial setup problems), but for the last month, our service(?) has been awful - now we cannot receive incoming calls at all, and the worst thing is that incoming callers do not go to voicemail but get a recording that says "The number you have reached has been disconnected and is no longer in service". We have called BV about this several times and after long hold times (sometimes 30 min), I get someone who says something like "our engineers are aware of the problem and working 24/7 to get it resolved". Comforting I guess. They also will not issue any credit for service outages, siting their "best-effort policy".
Not a happy camper.
FreddieD
join:2005-06-05
Shawnee, KS

FreddieD

Member

Re: Broadvoice service outage

This is the exact problem I have had with Broadvoice. Every company has their problems at one time or another, but the way they have handled it has been nothing short of atrocious. Not crediting back service for ENTIRE DAYS that the service is down, and when I do cancel, they charge $60 to your credit card until you return the box at which time they credit your account. This is fine, except that they charge you $50 in the first place to have the device shipped to you!

Other companies (such as Vonage) send you the device free of charge (including the shipping!). Unless you must use asterisk with your service, I would highly recommend staying away from BroadVoice. There are many alternatives out there that do not produce this level of heartache.

elroora
@rr.com

elroora

Anon

Re: Broadvoice service outage

Bah regardless, they are like a 3rd world phone company.
Just not worth the hassle.

And BTW Slice is a huge BV fanboi at voxilla, so take it with a grain of salt.
slicemaster
join:2001-12-14
Newbury Park, CA

slicemaster

Member

Re: Broadvoice service outage

said by elroora:

Bah regardless, they are like a 3rd world phone company.
Just not worth the hassle.

And BTW Slice is a huge BV fanboi at voxilla, so take it with a grain of salt.
What ever you say dude, think what you want. I just tell it like it is. I have always been critical of BV and their shortcomings and have always praised them for their accomplishments but by no means am I a fan boy, just a happy customer reporting his experiences.

Slice
Piper356
join:2004-07-16
Sugar Land, TX

Piper356

Member

Broadvoice inbound virtual numbers down

Family had to call on my local number due to my virtual number giving them a fast busy. Number is: 816-278-####.

Hold time for Broadvoice to pickup was 18 minutes. They stated there is an issue with inbound virtual numbers and they are working on it.

Anyone else having issues with inbound numbers giving a fast busy signal?

I have been with Broadvoice for less than one month. I'm not pleased with the service. Last week inbound voice was out, then outbound voice was out. Sent email to tech support and they responded 8 hours later "Please send us detailed information to my problem".

With all the issues people have stated, how do they stay in business?

If you have lots of complaints, here is a great site:

»voxilla.com/index.php?na ··· rum&f=23
slicemaster
join:2001-12-14
Newbury Park, CA

slicemaster

Member

Re: Broadvoice inbound virtual numbers down

said by Piper356:

Family had to call on my local number due to my virtual number giving them a fast busy. Number is: 816-278-####.

Hold time for Broadvoice to pickup was 18 minutes. They stated there is an issue with inbound virtual numbers and they are working on it.

Anyone else having issues with inbound numbers giving a fast busy signal?

I have been with Broadvoice for less than one month. I'm not pleased with the service. Last week inbound voice was out, then outbound voice was out. Sent email to tech support and they responded 8 hours later "Please send us detailed information to my problem".

With all the issues people have stated, how do they stay in business?

If you have lots of complaints, here is a great site:

»voxilla.com/index.php?na ··· rum&f=23
What ever makes you happy. Think what you want, if you aren’t happy with BV ,or any other provider for that matter, go else ware. No one is forcing you to stay and complain.
shoppa
join:2005-03-29
Spring, TX

shoppa

Member

Your recent update.

"recent calls to CS have resulted in 30sec-3min hold times"

Sorry sliceman. I do not believe you for one 30sec-3min interval.

There is no way broadvoice has made such a drastic turn around.

Your review almost seems if your paycheck depends on it.

hmm............
arnieman
join:2006-08-31
Smyrna, GA

arnieman

Member

Help with Xten X-Lite softphone and Broadvoice

Slice,

Any chance you installed the X-Lite softphone on a Mac? I'm having problems getting it set up. Works fine on my PC but the Mac version of X-Lite is a different animal and BV is no help.

Are there VOIP gurus that help other mere mortals sort this stuff out?

Thanks

Review by thehothit See Profile

  • Location: Trenton, Mercer, NJ, USA
  • Cost: $22 per month
Cheap
Very unreliable
Don't bother. Wait until they get their act together!
Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:

I signed up with BroadVoice in October 2004. At first, I was very excited about their service. Call quality was excellent (even compared to my Verizon PSTN line). There was the occasional outage, but they were few and far between.

After a couple of months, I started having problems with call quality. Some calls would be choppy, some would drop, others would have either no incoming or outgoing audio. These problems would usually be overcome by forcing my SPA-3000 to use another explicitly defined proxy server. Of course, that would only solve the problem for a few days or couple of weeks until that proxy server started playing up! I'd then have to play the proxy server switching game again.

Calling BroadVoice support usually resulted in getting a fast busy or waiting on hold and then getting hung up on before my call was answered by a tech. When I did get through, they were usually helpful, but never really had an answer as to why their proxy servers were so unreliable.

Then came the big outage of Spring 2005. Their service was basically unusable for a few days. Call quality from that point on was touch and go.

They have a lovely website, very tweakable settings, but generally unreliable service.

I've been using ViaTalk for the past month. Only a couple of minor outages so far. Hopefully they'll turn out to be a lot more reliable than BroadVoice.

member for 23.6 years, 1460 visits, last login: 17 days ago
lodged 18.6 years ago


Review by rjhall9 See Profile

  • Location: San Mateo, San Mateo, CA, USA
  • Cost: $22 per month
Worked well, immediately
none so far
looks good so far
Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:

So - after a long time deliberating I decided to go for it.
I was looking for a voip provider that would give me:
softphone support (I travel)
inclusive calls to the UK and US (expat brit)

Broadvoice seemed to be about the only one, so after playing with voipbuster for a while (for free) to check voip would work ok on my connection and pass the Wife Acceptance Factor, I signed up for Broadvoice $19.99 (unlimited US, Canada, W. Europe) with some hesistance given the mixed reviews on this site.

Took me ~3 minutes to sign up, during which I selected my own device (Cisco 7960).
The signup took about three minutes to accept the card payment, and then sent me some emails. The email provided a link to follow to set up the cisco phone. The link failed with a 404. Doh... The worry at this point started to increase.

Anyway, went to the BV site and followed the 'configure your device' links. The gave me some instructions to set the TFTP server on the cisco phone.

Followed the instructions, the phone rebooted itself and settled down after a couple of minutes of flashing lights. The 'line 1' button had my new phone number against it - looked good.

Picked up and got dialtone. Called my cellphone and it rang. Excellent.

I could hear myself on the cellphone just fine, but incoming sound to the cisco? not so much.

I fiddled with the router settings (the cisco is behind a nat fw/router) and then got incoming voice ok. That was kind of annoying, given that the same phone was working just great a few minutes earlier on voipbuster.

So - all looks good. Made a few local calls, good sound quality although maybe more latency than I was used to on voipbuster. Made a few international calls back to the UK - just as good. Couldn't make any long distance calls; turns out the dialplan expects 10 digit LD, not 11 digit LD.

Now - time to test the softphone. Fired up x-ten and started to configure, according to the instructions on the BV website. I needed the SIP password, which needed me to call BV support. Oh no... I'd heard it was all bad.

I called BV support and was on hold ~6 minutes. Spoke to a great rep that:
- emailed my the SIP settings for the cisco, including the phone PW and the SIP PW.
- told me how to dial LD (10 digit for dialing, 11 digit for call forwarding)
- Explained what happens if I fire up the softphone when travelling and the cisco is still plugged in. That was a worry for me, as it clearly states having two device active at once is a big no-no.
(turns out that once the xten registers, it'll kick off the cisco. reboot the cisco once the xten is shutdown and all is good again).

The website is pretty cool. Lots of choices to configure call forwarding, multi-ring (my cellphone rings when my cisco rings) etc. etc.

So - all looks just great right now. Website good (except the bad link in the signup email), the support experience was great and the price pretty unbeatable.

I'll get back soon when I know more. Off to Sweden on the weekend, so I'll test the softphone from there.

Oh - one wierd thing; they auto-configured my cisco with proxy.dca.bv.com. That's about the furthest away from me (LAX has pingtimes of about half dca). Odd....

Connection? DSL Extreme, ~500k up and ~6mb down. Great ISP btw, never had any problems. Cheap too, incl static IPs.

member for 18.6 years, 2 visits, last login: 17.5 years ago
lodged 18.6 years ago

slicemaster
join:2001-12-14
Newbury Park, CA

2 edits

slicemaster

Member

Yep...

You should have good results from Sweden; I was just in Europe (Sweden, Estonia, Norway, and Finland) on holiday a few weeks ago and was able to use my BV line from there via my soft phone USB handset combo over WiFi. I was also traveling with a hard phone (Sipura SPA-841) which actually gives better quality probably because it is hard wired. Anyways, my experience with BV is much like yours; they have just got a bad reputation because of the service meltdown a few months back and their inability to fix small issues (such as the proxy issues I describe below). Like you said, customer service via phone is good with low hold times, however don’t bother with e-mail support (e-mail support just plain sucks at this point). Call quality and reliability is just as good as with other providers and the price is unbeatable. Anyways, I am glad I am not the only one who is having good success with BV and maybe this will be proof to reasonable people that BV is making a comeback.

Slice

P.S. As to BV provisioning your phone to DCA, this is not surprising as they are having proxy issues (DCA and MIA are the only fully operation proxies last time I checked). I suppose they just aren’t maintaining the others such as LAX or CHI like they should be as they have been in the same state of limbo since I signed up with BV in late march. So if you use them don’t be surprised if some features don’t work (I have never been able to get caller ID with name, Call hold, or call transfer to work on any proxy other then DCA or MIA and it is definitely not my device configuration) and you most likely will also experience DTMF issues.