how-to block ads
|
»next review in page
 Review by TeatherWind 
UPDATED: 78 days ago
member for 8.2 years, 3780 visits, last login: a few hours ago
 Euless,Tarrant,TX
 Contract price not specified.
 "Sounds cool! Voice worked fine."
 "DVR interface was slow, residential gateway was not configurable"
 "They still have some kinks to work out. No need to downgrade your video to At&t, to get a package if net speed isn't faster.."
| Pre Sales Information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
When I moved I went back to at&t's DSL w/ dish for TV and I couldn't be happier.
I think that the Uverse service might be awesome in a few years, but the DVR software is buggy, the connection speed for the the data is no faster. The residential gateway required for the service had would not allow for the firewall to be disabled.
Still refusing to get u-verse again.
I get plenty of calls asking me if I would like uverse again, and I always refuse. After having 6 billing accounts, 2 of those being charged non-returned equipment. Not interested.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse |
 | »next review in page (previous review)
Review by Dale1
UPDATED: 78 days ago
member for 6.8 years, 105 visits, last login: 78 days ago
Wyandotte,Wayne,MI
Contract price not specified.
"Has 100 channels in lowest service"
"No Dial Up,Long Install,Long time (4weeks) to uninnstall, Local cable cheeper $35, Each TV requires a Box -No Box Local"
"Local Cable gives 82 Reg Channels,10 Hd 50 Music is $35 ATT Uverse is a rip Off,"
| |
I think U-Verse is a rip off and was very unhappy with it. It took 1 day to install it and 4 weeks to un install it and I was without my AT&T DSL for 3 weeks while they fiddled around with it. I had to dial up for three weeks to access the internet. I also understand that you need a box by each TV No Good I watch local cable ( 82 channels 10 HD channels, 50 Music channels ) with no box by each TV. I have 5 standard TV and 3 HD TV cost me a fortune for 7 extra boxes and where would I put them. Local Cable for $35 much better deal. I went back to local cable ( city owned) and AT&T DSL. Worst of all I lost AT&T Dial-Up( I repair computers as a sideline at not cost so I need dial up and it would have cost me $20 more to add Dial-up back).
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse |
| »next review in page (previous review)
 Review by tango_bob
Posted: 79 days ago
member for 7.9 years, 3693 visits, last login: a few hours ago
Evanston,Cook,IL
Contract price not specified.
 about 40 days
"More channels, faster internet, costs less."
"Major install issues"
"Weel worth it and highly recommend."
| Pre Sales Information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings below consensus)
|
Install was abysmal. It took 3 times.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by delltechkid
UPDATED: 84 days ago
member for 5 years, 161 visits, last login: 1 days ago
Hermitage,Davidson,TN
$60 per month
about 18 days
"Great Download Speeds, Stable Connection, Great Service"
"HD Picture Quality is awful, Low upload speeds, Long lead times for install"
"Excellent internet service, Good SD TV alternative"
| Pre Sales Information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
I ordered Uverse in mid August and had to wait 2 and a half weeks for installation. A couple of days before the install a line tech came out and conditioned the lines, gave me a new drop and a new NID. I was scheduled from 11 - 1 and the AT&T dispatch center called me at 12 to proactively tell me that my tech might be a few minutes late. The prem tech also called me directly and gave me an arrival time. Once he arrived I found him to be extremely personable and friendly and had me up and running in 2 hours (my house is already wired with Cat5e).
I noticed immediately on HD that the picture quality wasn't comparable to my DirecTV HD picture. The picture was several shades darker and I noticed that in darker areas of the picture, the entire detail was lost into a black blob. I'm not a picky audiophile or anything but this was noticeable enough that both my partner and I could see it. Also I had been waiting for AT&T to resolve the audio drops with Dolby Digital but I noticed that I had that problem when hooked up via HDMI. All that in mind, I unhooked the TV boxes on Sunday and cancelled the TV portion.
I kept the internet. I have the Max12. It's the same price as Comcast for a similar package but it doesn't have a modem rental fee which is now $5 from Comcast. So I don't have power boost, but I'm saving $5/month. The speed is fast enough for me without power boost. I also like the fact that with AT&T the modem/router is all in one package. This cleaned up my network area a little bit by not having an additional item.
One more note about the TV. The SD picture quality is the best I have ever seen. On cable or satellite. It was crystal clear. Also the user interface was excellent. I think it's one of the best I've ever seen.
Overall I think Uverse has the capability of being an awesome product. Once they work out the HD issues, they'll have a great product on their hands. My gateway syncs at about 60mpbs so I think with pair bonding, there really will be no lack of bandwidth available for the foreseeable future.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse |
| »next review in page (previous review)
 Review by mers2
UPDATED: 84 days ago
member for 5.7 years, 2361 visits, last login: a few hours ago
USA
$99 per month
"U-Verse TV is great and I love the DVR abilitiy to record up to 4 shows at once"
"Wireless internet not reliable when WPA security used on RG"
"I'm paying less than when I had cable for TV & straight DSL"
| Pre Sales Information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
UPDATE: I've had the U-Verse service for over a year and have been happy for the most part. When there has been an outage tech support has been great - all calls have been answered here in the U.S. by knowledgeable people. TV quality has continued to be good and internet speeds have improved and stabilized.
After Install: I have had ATT U-Verse for TV and high speed internet for about 2 months.. I have the 6MB down plan along with UV400 TV plan. I was given a discount rate for 12 months on the TV
My complaint about the sales staff is their insistence that WEP is a safe security encryption, when in fact WEP encryption was broken a few years ago. The install went smoothly and took only 3 hours, when they had estimated 6. I have 2 complaints on installation. The installer refused to hard wire one of the computers insisting all computers needed to be wireless and he also refused to set the RG to WPA mode and would not let me change it while he was there. When he left, TV was sharp and clear and my internet speed was great.
After setting up one computer with a hard wire connection myself and changing the encryption to WPA, I noticed a distinct drop in speeds to less than 1MB down. After tinkering with some settings I get good speed most of the time, but have a high rate of disconnects that I never had with straight ATT DSL.
Overall, I'm happy with the service and happier that the monthly bill has gone down for TV and internet combined has gone down.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by nissan4x4
Posted: 86 days ago
member for 98 days, 20 visits, last login: 63 days ago
Bentonville,Benton,AR
Contract price not specified.
"Fast 3.0mbps Good Gaming no lag"
"hard to sync up to wireless adapters"
"good customer service good speed"
| |
orderd 8/13/09 installed 9/2/09 contrary to what people have said about u verse gaming capabilities mine is far exceptional to cox cable no lag whatsoever fast internet which is all i got 3.0 mbps.I also had cox HSI and satilite internet before.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse |
| »next review in page (previous review)
 Review by houkouonchi
Posted: 86 days ago
member for 7.3 years, 2395 visits, last login: a few hours ago
Corona,Riverside,CA
$65 per month
about 5 days
"Decently Fast. So far its been stable"
"High latency due to Interleaving. Crappy upload speed. Can't be installed with existing DSL"
"Its ok and much faster than DSL. I would recommend it if your not a gamer"
| Pre Sales Information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings below consensus)
|
I ordered U-Verse for the 4th time in over 2 years and finally got it installed. My previous attempts failed because I still had a DSL line. It is really lame but AT&T won't let an order be placed if you have existing DSL otherwise they would have already had a customer for two years.
I am getting around 17.3 megabits down and 1.5 up (on the 18/1.5 package). The upload is pretty pathetic for VDSL considering in Japan I had 100/100 through VDSL. I switched as I believe they would be offering 24/2 soon which hasn't happened due to the 32/5 profile being rolled back and because of the fact my DSL lines deteriorated causing constant reboots and eventual lost of sync.
My biggest complaint with u-verse is the interleaving. My line supports up to 55 meg down so I don't even see why it has to be enabled or for everyone at this point. I get 25ms latency to my server in Los Angeles when I got 7-8 with DSL Extreme. My pings are generally 20ms higher everywhere with u-verse than when I had DSL Extreme.
I am really hoping that I can get DSL Extreme installed now that I already have u-verse up and running or if AT&T is going to block the order like they did when I had DSL Extreme and couldn't get u-verse.
We shall see!
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by Attack Gypsy
Posted: 86 days ago
member for 2.5 years, 718 visits, last login: a few minutes ago
Bridgeport,Fairfield,CT
$130 per month
about 11 days
"Smooth connection, decent speeds"
"Poor order co-ordination"
| Pre Sales Information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
Install took about 4 hours, due to some signal problems. Main office made a mistake in the TV order, fixed 2 days later with another appointment. Everything running fine. Internet getting 14 down, 1.4 up.. Phone seems to work well. TV picture is sharp and crisp.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by vaporiized
Posted: 89 days ago
member for 6.1 years, 33 visits, last login: 6 days ago
Fort Worth,Tarrant,TX
$100 per month
about 6 days
"Fast 6 meg Download Speeds, Actual 1 meg upload speeds! (i have elite package)"
"Constant internet outtages,Phone & TV service interruptions."
"A Good service, needs much better support and less outtages"
| Pre Sales Information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
Fast 6 meg Download Speeds, Actual 1 meg upload speeds! (i have elite package)
Constant internet outtages,Phone & TV service interruptions.
A Good service, needs much better support and less outtages
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse |
| »next page (previous review)
 Review by Mosley
UPDATED: 91 days ago
member for 8.7 years, 369 visits, last login: 20 days ago
Oklahoma City,Oklahoma,OK
$126 per month
about 10 days
"Good Marketing listing as 20 Megs connection"
"Good Marketing listing as 20 Megs connection"
"The fastest connection is only .2Mb marketing as 20Mb is inaccurate."
| Pre Sales Information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings below consensus)
|
AT&T advertises their home U-Verse as a 20Mb (Meg) connection.
My AT&T sales associate told me that I would have a 20Mb up and 20Mb down connection speed.
I was using Cox Cable's cable modem connection and getting an average connection of 1.4 Mb connection speed down and .4 Mb upload speed average. So a jump to 20 Mb both up and down would be fantastic.
I was told this would be a fiber optic connection to the Ped then on 2 wire copper to the house at 823 ft of new copper as this was a new addition with all new wire and the Ped was about 8 months old with direct ties into the buried fiber optic lines, the only slow down would be the cap that AT&T placed into the modem.
After the install was completed (5 hours) I began testing the speed of connection and was only achieving a .35Mb connection. I contacted customer support and verified I was listed for the 20Mb connection package (I was), then was transferred to tech support to have the modem uncapped and reset with the new correct cap for 20Mb connection speed.
The system was then rebooted several times by them through the network and then by me via direct disconnection from the wall a/c supply as directed by tech support.
After approximately 2 hours with customer service and tech support.. I was advised by tech support that I had one of the best connections they had ever seen with idea connection to the modem with the best s/n rates (signal to noise) and the best power db (decibels of signal) rates. And every thing was updated and correct with a 20Mb connection.
I then went online and tested my connection speed to servers 183 miles away in Dallas TX (this normally gives me the fastest test speeds) along with servers in LA CA, ATL GA, NJ NJ, CHI IL, the fastest of witch gave me a speed rating of .2Mb (megabits). This connection was solid both up and down with a latency average of 82ms (with Cox Cable my average latency was 17ms). As a Data Base consultant and maintenance professional the latency does not affect me as much as it would a gamer.
I then spent more than an hour on the phone again with tech support and customer service to get this situation corrected. Knowing that a majority of customers have not been programming computers for over 25 years (from the days when we used punch cards to program systems) and would not know what a true Mb was and not contest the false advertisements of speed being lost in a grammatical translation of industry standards.
Luckily I had not canceled my Cox Cable account, and have years of experience making connections and was able to remove the filters in the 75 ohm cabling that AT&T had placed at every connection, and reconnected my Cox Cable system and was instantly back to my 1.4Mb connection with .4 Mb upload and a 17ms latency rating.
My AT&T U-Verse experience lasted about 18 hours, and was a horrid nightmare of lies and deception.
I would advise anyone in the Oklahoma City area who is considering a high speed connection to the internet to steer clear of the lies and deception of AT&T's U-Verse and their sales associates, who honestly are sales people not computer tech people and probably are just saying whatever they have been told to say or are reading on the screen in front of them.
AT&T does offer a "faster than dial up connection" in this area, but with the cost of service, it is truly a joke and does not qualify as a "high speed connection" by today’s standards and the market availability in the Oklahoma City, OK area.
If you are a fan of AT&T, good for you little buddy! In your area, it may be the best connection available. Here in Oklahoma City AT&T is trying to get one over on its customers. And they will defend it to the death, bashing anyone who gives them a bad review.
It's funny how a few people get offended about a bad post about their company, almost as if it effects their personal income to have other customers seeing what is really going on in a given area. Then they compare it to ??? . This review was written for the AT&T U-Verse in Oklahoma City, OK.
Here are links to test I ran on my connection today.
»www.speedtest.net/result/556590708.png
»www.speedtest.net/result/556601001.png
»www.speedtest.net/result/556701027.png
Followup comments:  Lotuseyes
join:2008-07-17
Byron, MN
1 edit | Megabit vs Megabyte Everywhere I've ever looked has listed their connection speeds as megabits, not megabytes. In fact, I don't think I've ever seen a connection advertised in megabytes before. Probably should check that out better before you order next time 
PS: since when does cox offer 114 megabit cable connections? I want some of that! | |
| | | | | FastAttack
Premium
join:2000-07-28
Fort Lauderdale, FL
clubs:
 ·AT&T U-Verse
 ·AT&T Southeast
 ·T-Mobile US
1 edit | Re: Megabit vs Megabyte said by ILpt4U :I have always seen internet or LAN connections advertised/listed in Kilo/Mega bits per second. The industry standard for that is Kbps/Mbps. Download speeds by your browser are usually measured in KBps or MBps, but not the connection. Cable Companies, Phone Companies, heck even Dial Up connections are all K/Mbps. Even a LAN connection is 10/100/1000 Mbps. I guarantee your Cox connection is sold as Mbps as well. Oh and technically it is a difference by a factor of 8, not 10, as there are 8 bits in 1 Byte. I find it interesting that you did not come check out the U-Verse DSLR forum before placing your order, but felt compelled to come & give it a bad rating now, because there was a miscommunication about the product & the units describing the internet speeds. A quick question on the U-Verse Forum would have cleared up any questions you may have had. Good luck with your Cox connection. I completely agree.
some people are just ignorant.. and everything revolves around them. Which the op seems to be in.
like everyone else on this forum, and the rest of the planet.. connections are in Mbps not "Megs" | |
| |
Mosley
Premium
join:2001-02-27
Oklahoma City, OK | Here in OKC their adds say Meg's. | |
| | Learux
join:2001-10-23
Valencia, CA | strange This is the same as buying a 12 inch frying pan. Then give it a bad rating because it is too small and you realy wanted a 16 inch | |
| | | mjwise
join:2007-05-09
Ann Arbor, MI
·AT&T U-Verse
| I don't think so ---
Industry standards denote Megs as MB aka Megabytes, these are 10X grater than mb aka megabits. Megabits are not referred to as Megs (Megs is the reference to MB)
---
Uh, no.
---
I was using Cox Cable's cable modem connection and getting an average connection of 14 Meg connection speed down and 4 Meg upload speed average.
---
No you weren't.
Really, no one in the US rates their connections in MB/s. Unless you're in some sort of high end super secret Cox DOCSIS3 trial, you don't get to pull > 100Mbps from them either. | |
| | 
julesism
join:2001-12-12
Austin, TX | Re: I don't think so review fail... mosley has it! | |
|
Mosley
Premium
join:2001-02-27
Oklahoma City, OK | Corrected errors I corrected a few errors to eliminate confusion over the MB/Mb/mb stuff. | |
| | | | sideloaded
join:2006-06-17
Rogers, AR | ?? You "program computers" but don't know the difference from a megabyte and a megabit? What program languages do you exactly know? | |
| acidangel111
join:2006-11-02
Visalia, CA
| there is no way you have 114 megabits This is funny , actually there are 8 bits to a byte . not 10X , so 20 megabits would be 2.5 (without overhead). ABSOLUTELY no way at home that you have anywhere close to 114 megabits. Even with DOCSIS 3.0 it is in THEORY possible , however your first ISPS to rollout docsis 3.0 such as COX (currently has a 28megabit in production and a 33.1 in internal testing only. Also the second and ONLY at this time (to my knowledge ) has a 25.4 megabit feed in testing . DOCSIS 3.0 requires a completely different feed coming in (dedicated) and a different physical modem. You cannot achieve docsis 3.0 speeds over 2.0 or the now depreciated 1.0 . Sorry guys :-S . | |
| | | |
| Forums » comments on review of AT&T U-Verse |
|
|
(56)
(39)
(16)
·
·
