how-to block ads
|
»next review in page
Review by OmagicQ 
UPDATED: a few hours ago
member for 6 years, 230 visits, last login: a few minutes ago
 Bakersfield,Kern,CA
 $4 per month
 about 4 days
 "Dirt Cheap DIDs, acceptable CNAM"
 "E911 fee"
 "Solid VSP with great customer support that won me over"
| Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
CC was my 2nd VSP and at first I was put off by the E911 fee and that they proxy the audio on calls. The idea of my phone calls having to go all the way to NY from CA seemed to me to be a recipe for disaster for voip calls with high latency and many potential points of failure for a UDP stream crossing the country. I even at one point wrote to CC support asking them to close out my account, that I'd never use it or fund it. They wrote back saying they would keep it open unless I insisted. I didn't care as I had no plan to ever use it again.
Well I'm happy to say I was mistaken. After putting up with downtime from a well-known free did provider, I took a chance on a dirt-cheap did that took about 4 days to activate since I used Paypal. Once it was working I set it up for GV and tried it out. After a few days there was no going back. The audio quality was better than I expected even after a cross country trip and the latency wasn't enough to really affect the audio. I enabled CNAM and it worked great with all the numbers I called from except my cellphone that showed a name that isn't mine, but as cellphones usually show WIRELESS CALLER I think my number may have been ported from a landline some time ago and I got it.
Today I changed from IP Freedom to Pay-per-call and on a test call my outbound CID was my GV number as I had requested shortly after signing up. Support has always been helpful and courteous even when I was a free customer. I don't know if its standard policy for CC not to close accounts even when the customer asks, but in this case it eventually got them a paying customer.
Update 10/13/09 After having used the service for a few weeks and tweaking the settings on my PAP2T and 2Wire modem/router I am satisfied with the service except for the per minute pricing. I have figured out what my average outbound usage will be and i've decided to move on to a VSP with lower rates and most of the features I'd use. CC has rock solid service and features and I still rate it highly.
Update 11/21/09 I use Google Voice as my public facing number and forward it to two numbers for simultaneous ring, my VSP number and my cellphone. This way I can receive calls even if my VSP has a service outage (hasn't happened or I haven't noticed yet). This has been working great but I've decided instead of using my cellphone as backup, I'd use the second port on my ATA with another provider. I'm back on Callcentric using a per-minute did as my backup. I could use an IPKall number but I want something more reliable and $3.45 a month for that reliability is a fair price to pay. F9 is still my main provider where my paid outbound calls will be made through (Still using GV for free outbound). This setup will give me redundancy in call reception without spending too much and E911 (which i will probably never use).
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Callcentric |
 | »next review in page (previous review)
 Review by neko
UPDATED: 1 days ago
member for 3.2 years, 514 visits, last login: 1 days ago
St Catharines,ON
$5 per month
about 1 days
"Easy setup, good web interface, great prices"
"none so far"
"$1.95 a month for incoming DID with pay as you go"
| Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
Update: November 20, 2009
Well, it's coming up to 2 years since I started with Callcentric, & I am as pleased as punch with their operation.
CNAM was switched on for free, & they recently upgraded their 'Call Treatments' software to support wildcards. I really don't use the 'phone that much, so for a long time now, I have only had to charge up my account every Two months, rather than every month.
I really have to agree wholeheartedly with other responders here, that CC's tech support is absolutely top notch. I've had replies to support e-mails within 30 minutes or so, late on a Sunday evening. Not that I have had to use their support that often, the quality of service, and up-time, is truly outstanding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------
Update: March 26th, 2009
* Free voicemail.
* Free ability to block telemarketers (or other annoying individuals) using a disconnected notice, & the SIT tones.
*Got my Free iNum.
I still cannot believe all the features they have, & they are all included in the price. I pay ~$5.00 Canadian a month for this fantastic service.
*******************************
I signed up with Callcentric a week ago. I haven't deposited any money to activate calling regular phones yet. ** UPDATES BELOW **
I think their web interface for configuring your account is spot on, with some great features including anonymous call blocking & regular call blocking - Should keep the telemarketers at bay 
Had a problem with call quality doing a test call, however their online support was easy to use & very fast at replying. Got my problem sorted out.
I like the fact they have no contracts & are an inexpensive way of trying out BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) VOIP.
Once I am using the service to call regular phones I will update my review to reflect that, but so far so good.
I have given them 60% on Call Quality & 60% on Reliability for now as I don't have the service proper yet; I think that's fair.
I encourage other Callcentric users to go to the Callcentric forum here: »Callcentric
** REVIEW UPDATE **
I paid from my credit card to activate outbound calling & to get an incoming number. All it costs is $1.95 a month for an incoming number & that's it: No other charges other than your call charges pay-as-you-go. There are no contracts & they even have a money back guarantee.
it took literally minutes for the service to be active & I could start making calls, it was that fast!
I called my sister here in Canada & the call quality was great. Just as good as Vonage.
I am absolutely over the moon at their prices. I looked at my call history with Vonage & it looks like I will be paying round about $8 a month (Includes tax).
I have already canceled Vonage & I am very pleased with my decision to switch to Callcentric.
If you are looking for a quality VOIP provider you should really look at Callcentric. You wont be disappointed.
** UPDATE ** 11 December 2007
I finally bought a PAP2-NA device to use with Callcentric. They had setup information on their website & it was a breeze to configure. Calls are clear & with no echos.
Paying $5 a month for my phone bill, fantastic!
** UPDATE ** 1 February 2008
Still using Callcentric. I have been making calls to the UK from Canada & the quality is fantastic. No static or drops. Still very pleased with the service & rates. Sure there are other providers offering lower rates, but we are talking 0.005 cents a minute difference. That's not enough to make me switch from what is a great VOIP provider. I just hope they keep up their excellent service & rates.
** UPDATE ** 18 January 2009
FREE VOICEMAIL
Wow! Can this provider get no better? No wonder they are the top rated VoIP provider on DSL reports. Fantastic, these guys are the bomb!
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Callcentric |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by PX Eliezer
UPDATED: 3 days ago
member for 1.2 years, 693 visits, last login: a few hours ago
New Jersey
Contract price not specified.
about 1 days
"Great customer service, Reliable, Clear calls, Excellent control panel."
"A little pricey on outbound calling, but very good value overall."
"So good, I keep forgetting it's VoIP. But the features remind me!"
| Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
Review updated 17 November 2009
--------------------------------------------------
CallCentric is an excellent provider overall.
It's so good, I keep forgetting my phone service is Voip. In fact, CallCentric is clearer than my old Verizon POTS line.
MAJOR STRENGTHS:
*High quality phone service!
*Great reliability, consistent track record.
*Excellent customer support! Ticket system based, but almost always very quick.
*Good peering capabilities and SipBroker and iNum support, and URI calling. This allows you to make and receive free calls from many other Voip networks. SipBroker support is the best around. I also note that it is easy to get a number for the new iNum service, which may even further expand the universe of free calling.
*BYOD: Just about any type of device will work.
Extensive configuration information for many devices.
*Excellent website and control panel (dashboard) with
extensive "call treatment" options.
*Good billing system.
*Many new features, such as incoming CNAM, added March 2009! Good job all around. And the CNAM can be customized for specific calls. For example, if a caller shows up as "Wireless Call" you can override the system to show the specific person's name.
MINOR QUIBBLE:
*Price is a tad high. Outbound pay-as-you-go calls are almost 2 cents a minute. The flat-rate outbound plan (North America Unlimited) is $ 19.95. They could offer some kind of "inbetween" option like some other providers have. Still, they are a good value, and their excellent and reliable service is worth it.
AT HOME:
I ported my home number to them recently. The whole process went well, it works great, and my family is happy.
Overall, a very solid provider, and I don't think there is anyone else who is more conscientious and reliable. They really care about their service and take a personal pride in it.
UPDATES: November 2009---
a) I recently added another CallCentric account. Whereas my first one is for home, the new account is for business. I am using it for outbound calls and also we are setting up a new DID to use as a second main DID for incoming calls. This reflects my faith in this company.
b) On October 1st there was an outage relating to equipment upgrades and enhancements. This is a very rare event for CallCentric and they jumped on it quickly and aggressively. As a backup means of communication in the unlikely event of a repeat episode, CallCentric has set up a Twitter account at »twitter.com/Callcentric. This is only for use as an emergency backup communication system.
c) One nice use of the CallCentric Call Treatments and easy SipBroker access: Last night an obviously drunk guy kept calling my house on his cellphone. Using call treatments, if he calls again, he will be routed to the recording of monkey sounds. (His calls will be forwarded to **275*266300 which is the screaming monkey recording. Might sober him up).
Followup comments:  mogulman
Premium
join:2002-09-09
Parker, CO | Length of time you've had service How long have you had their service? Seems like you are new to the forums. | |
| | PX Eliezer
Premium
join:2008-08-09
New Jersey
 ·Callcentric
·Optimum Voice
·callwithus
·voip.ms
1 edit | Re: Length of time you've had service said by mogulman :How long have you had their service? That's a fair question.
I have been using CallCentric since June. But I was getting my questions answered by their customer service team even before I started using it. And also, I've been reading this dslreports website for most of this year.
One main reason I started using them for VoIP was looking at all the other CallCentric reviews on this site. Looks like the reviews go back almost a year. It's remarkable that nobody really has any major negatives on this company.
I think that when you start using a VoIP provider, you are going to know very, very soon if they are good or bad. How was the signup process, how was initial setup, how was their customer service responsiveness to deal with questions, how does their website work to check your billing and to configure your services, how is call quality, and so forth.
I've asked questions of these guys late in the evening and still gotten e-mail responses in a few minutes.
Please note, I am not saying they are perfect. Nobody is perfect, except maybe that Olympic swimmer guy. In my review, I did suggest some ways CallCentric could be even better. But I do think that they are about the best around of all the companies I've looked at.
Finally: I'd compare it to dating. I think that folks figure out pretty quickly if the person they are dating is a keeper or a creeper.
Thanks for reading my review! | |
| PX Eliezer
Premium
join:2008-08-09
New Jersey | . Since these old comments are still posted here, please note that when I said service with them since June, it means June 2008.
Very happy. | |
| | | |
| Forums » comments on review of Callcentric |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by peatbog
UPDATED: 6 days ago
member for 224 days, 6 visits, last login: 6 days ago
Los Angeles,Los Angeles,CA
$1 per month
"good web site; bells and whistles; decent tech support; good sound"
"Costs too much; no IVR"
"Useful as a backup"
| Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
I use it as a backup. It is more useful for its calling card feature (called a DISA), meaning that you can route an incoming call to the 'calling card', and get a prompt to enter your PIN. When you do, you get a dial tone.
Very handy, and I'll be using it until Voip.ms puts in its own DISA, which is in the works.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Callcentric |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by Arne Bolen
Posted: 6 days ago
member for 153 days, 234 visits, last login: a few hours ago
Denmark
$10 per month (month by month)
"Excellent web site, easy to use, good quality on calls to North and South America"
"Poor quality on outbound calls from Europe to European PSTN numbers"
"A good VoIP provider"
| Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
I have been using Callcentric for almost 3 years now. As I live in Europe my experience with Callcentric may not be the same as for a customer living in North America.
At the moment I have DIDs in USA and Denmark with Callcentric, and also one iNum DID. Earlier I have also had DIDs in UK, Ireland, Sweden and Brazil with Callcentric.
Callcentric is very good at assigning "easy to remember" numbers when ordering DIDs. Every DID I have purchased from Callcentric had a number very easy to remember.
The quality on calls to/from North and South America is excellent. The quality on inbound calls from Europe is good but the noticeable delay is sometimes annoying. However the quality on outbound calls from Europe to European PSTN numbers is bad.
The quality on free inbound and outbound calls between Callcentric customers in Europe using 1777xxxxxxx numbers is very good and there is no noticeable delay.
Callcentric Phone Book entries replacing incoming Caller ID is a wonderful feature you get addicted to.
Callcentric could be a good choice for European customers if they could use better carriers in Europe and also have servers in Europe. As it is now Callcentric can't be recommended for use to/from European PSTN numbers for European customers. However for calls to/from North and South America Callcentric is an excellent choice for European customers.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Callcentric |
| »next review in page (previous review)
 Review by Murdoc
UPDATED: 7 days ago
member for 285 days, 177 visits, last login: a few hours ago
Manitowoc,Manitowoc,WI
$25 per month
"Unlimited local and long distance in united states and lots of other stuff"
"none, it wasn't the fault of callcentric. It was att's fault."
"Lots of calling features included, cheaper then phone company."
| Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
I really have no complaints. The fees are mentioned up front. Apparently AT&T caused problems of getting a number assigned, I know this to be true with att because I have to spend an hour or longer if I want to get something added or changed. So if you have only att servicing your area go with the next closest cities number that att doesnt serve.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Callcentric |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by mastersushi
UPDATED: 15 days ago
member for 15 days, 0 visits, last login: 15 days ago
North Fort Myers,Lee,FL
$5 per month
"Great call quality. Low Cost. Reliable. Fast customer service via email. e911."
"Can only have one registered device at a time."
"The best VOIP solution I have found."
| Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
I have done a lot of VOIP comparison shopping. My criteria has been low cost with e911 service. I wanted anyone to be able to grab the phone and dial 911 in an emergency (just in case.)
Callcentric charges a small recurring fee for e911, but since I know local municipalities charge for this, I understand that callcentric needs to pass along this cost to me.
I also got a 'dirt cheap did'. This costs 2.95 per month and gives me unlimited incoming calls.
I also use a Google Voice number I have associated with this 'dirt cheap did' to give me a true local number to give out to family & friends. I also use Google Voice to make my outbound calls so I get unlimited outbound and inbound calling for less than $5.00 per month with e911 support. Truly an amazing deal!
I haven't found this value or reliability from any other VOIP provider, so I am very pleased with Callcentric. Their website is top notch and they provide a lot features for their price point.
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Callcentric |
| »next review in page (previous review)
 Review by QED
UPDATED: 17 days ago
member for 1.8 years, 935 visits, last login: a few hours ago
Carrollton,Denton,TX
$12 per month (month by month)
about 1 days
"So many options, very reliable and prompt support."
"No simultaneous ring."
"Great service and support. Excellent quality and very reasonable"
| Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
11/3/09 Update
Same great service as when I first tried the service. There was one outage, but they had already planned (and emailed) an upgrade to address their increasing capacity.
Would like to see simultaneous ring, but everything else is great.
***********
I tried the service before I transferred my main number, and was not disappointed. I now have other "Dirt Cheap DIDs" that use SIP URI pointing to different providers. Another one points to their FAX service and has worked great.
Call quality is excellent. I have only called US numbers so I cannot comment on other countries.
The website has a lot of useful information and is well organized.
Call Treatments allow me to redirect telemarketers (one at a time) to an error message. Call logs help me find the number.
When I email support, even at 2:00am Sunday night, I receive a response within 30 minutes even on low priority problems.
Followup comments: SteveinNC
join:2007-07-19
Greensboro, NC | Callcentric Support is Amazing ! Yes, the e mail support is amazing.
When I originally signed up on a Sunday, my three emails replied to on average 45 min. | |
| | | |
| Forums » comments on review of Callcentric |
| »next review in page (previous review)
Review by LB2064
UPDATED: 31 days ago
member for 223 days, 43 visits, last login: 31 days ago
Newtown,Bucks,PA
$4 per month
about 20 days
"Excellent Call Quality; Great Support; Intuitive Website; Nice Features."
"Not the cheapest US rates but very competitive if you are in an unlimited plan and also include international rates."
"Excellent service; Absolutely no regrets! Definitely a top rate VoIP provider."
| Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
UPDATE: 2009-10-20
I have been with CallCentric (CC) now for over 6 months and I am still one very happy customer. As a complete phone service, they have been a very reliable company - I still have absolutely no regrets porting my numbers over to CC from my previous traditional phone company!!
I had an issue with quality at one point and spent several hours with customer support only to discover that the fault was actually on my end. Just as an fyi - the quality problem was coming from my old cordless phone system but once I upgraded to the new Panasonic Dect 6.0 cordless phones the quality issue disappeared - just a tip if you are having call quality problems with any VOIP and are still using the older 2.4Hz cordless phones.
While some have complained about CC US rates, I have found you need to evaluate the total package of each provider and you will find that CC holds up easily in the top tier of VOIP Providers. Also, note that to get free 1800/1866/1877 with CC just dial **275* before the toll free number (a minor inconvenience) or better yet just add the code to your Dial Plan in your ATA (and the inconvenience disappears!).
Overall, CallCentric remains my top pick of the VoIP Providers I have tried and anyone looking for a serious VoIP Provider should consider them. There are several other good services out there so in the long run it will come down to your individual taste.
2009-04-12
I switched from Verizon to CallCentric about 3 weeks ago and have found their service to be excellent. While slightly cheaper US rates can be found with other VOIP services, I have also made a lot of international calls to Africa and when all rates are considered CallCentric comes out to be a lot cheaper for me than other VOIP services. Also if you make a lot of local US calls then the unlimited plans are great especially the inbound plans.
Their website is the easiest I found to navigate through. They have all the regular features such as call blocking, anonymous call rejection, do not disturb, international call blocking, 99 speed dialers, etc. There is also a Call Treatment option that allows you to set up custom rules to have additional control over call blocking which is very good compared to other services I looked at - actually much much better than most. I still think there is room for improvement in the Call Treatment section for this features to be exceptional but for now it is still a great to-have.
Customer Support is super with questions being answered rather promptly. I am now in the process of porting my 2 Verizon numbers.
So far, I am very happy especially as I am getting great service for less!!!
LB
Followup comments: | Forums » comments on review of Callcentric |
| »next page (previous review)
Review by fallingover
UPDATED: 33 days ago
member for 327 days, 28 visits, last login: 10 days ago
Los Angeles,Los Angeles,CA
Contract price not specified.
"solid performer"
"Too Expensive compared to voip.ms (and others?)"
"You can do better elsewhere"
| Web-site:
Ease of Installation:
Call Quality:
Reliability:
Tech Support:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)
|
++++
Update October 19 2009
I changed the value for money rating to a 3 in order to remove the 'stain' of a negative review - the only one. It still makes my point that Callcentric charges too much for what it delivers.
+++++
Update October 18 2009
Quick update. Nothing has changed my opinion about this company. They do a decent job, but charge too much. I cannot understand what their problem is - misplaced resources, high cost of labor?
I will continue to use them as a fallback until the money in my account runs out, and then find a cheaper fallback.
In the last year or two, a reliable, good-sounding connection has become standard among all but the junkiest providers. You should not have to pay a relatively high price for good performance. But if you use Callcentric as a fallback, that is what you are doing. Even if you use it as your main voip provider, you are still overpaying compared to Voip.ms, and, I'm sure, others.
What value for money are you getting in that case? It seems to me, not a great deal. Because of that, I have lowered my estimate in the 'Value for Money' category.
+++++
Callcentric provides good service, but I can't see using it except as a fallback, because it is too expensive compared with voip.ms, and probably others.
VOIP.MS has every feature that callcentric has, except for calling card, and in addition has incoming call handling that is practically like having an asterisk server - callcentric cannot touch it. VOIP.MS also has simultaneous ring which callcentric does not have. And VOIP.MS has large numbers of DIDs, as many as callcentric. Callcentric sounds good, but no better than voip.ms; it is reliable, but no more reliable than voip.ms.
Yet callcentric charges more for outgoing calls: 1.98 cents/minute, vs. voip.ms's 1.05 - 1.49 cents/minute; it has a higher setup fee for DIDs (3.95 for callcentric vs .50 to .99 for VOIP.MS).
Having used both vosps for some time, I feel that callcentric is asking too much for what it provides. It is not competing, and will not get my business except as a fallback.
Followup comments: nitzan
Premium,VIP
join:2008-02-27
·ViaTalk
 ·Comcast
| Support... You're comparing voip.ms - who's support has been rated pretty poorly in the past - to CallCentric - who has some of the best support ratings in the industry.
Support costs money, it's a fact. You can't provide quality support at voip.ms's prices. You get what you pay for. While voip.ms chose to give you cheap prices and questionable support - CallCentric chose to give you full quality support at higher prices. They're not trying to rip you off - they're trying to make enough money to pay for their support engineers.  | |
| | fallingover
join:2008-12-28
Los Angeles, CA
·voip.ms
·Callcentric
| Re: Support... said by nitzan :You're comparing voip.ms - who's support has been rated pretty poorly in the past - to CallCentric - who has some of the best support ratings in the industry. I can't comment on past support problems with VOIP.MS, but from my experience over the past year - half a dozen questions, problems, or suggestions that I made to support - I was answered usually within hours and always to the point. And I think other recent reviews of VOIP.MS agree with that.
When I have contacted callcentric support, I received the same good support service - but it was no better than that of VOIP.MS.
Support costs money, it's a fact. You can't provide quality support at voip.ms's prices.
Apparently you can.
You get what you pay for. While voip.ms chose to give you cheap prices and questionable support - CallCentric chose to give you full quality support at higher prices. They're not trying to rip you off - they're trying to make enough money to pay for their support engineers. | |
| | | 
cc user
@comcast.net
 from:
RiverMerger
| Re: Support... Callcentric is not aiming at being a budget voip provider. Nor would I want them to be. I would rather pay a few cents more and have them around, rather than see them fail like many other voip carriers.
In the end, may the best voip company win. Cheap and nasty never survives. | |
| | | PX Eliezer
Premium
join:2008-08-09
New Jersey
·Callcentric
·Optimum Voice
·callwithus
·voip.ms
3 edits | Rate comparisons Thoughtful review.
I rather agree with you regarding CallCentric's per-minute outbound rates. They do need to rethink that issue a bit. The rest of their rates are good overall.
I don't ever see CC as being an aggressive competitor on price. It's not what they're about.
I think that Voip.MS and CallCentric are both good outfits, somewhat different from each other, but each is a market leader in its own way.
Rates are interesting. Some folks use OneSuite. There are various ways to call on OneSuite but the rate for USA if using the OneSuite Voip is 2.5 cents! They must have some happy customers, but wow.....
When I deal with a Voip company, I want to be sure they can stay around. So while you may think I'm nuts, I worry if a company's rates are too low. The bear preparing for the winter is better off being too fat than too skinny.
I view things as follows:
CallCentric: Nordstrom
Voip.MS: Target (in the good sense)
Some others: Wal-Mart
And others: K-Mart
Voip.MS, like Target, has come a long way. I use both companies for some things.
But if you want your wife to be unquestionably comfortable with your home phone service and with your dress shirt, a case can be made for CallCentric and for Nordstrom, respectively.
And yes, having said that, I wish the outbound minutes and the shirts were both a little cheaper.
ADDED IN EDIT:
I forgot to mention: Besides customer service, one place where CallCentric really shines is free Voip (SIP) calling. Nobody does it better when it comes to supporting SipBroker, direct IP calling, peering with other networks, and now the new iNum calling. Some customers will not use these features, but for others they add much value. | |
| | fallingover
join:2008-12-28
Los Angeles, CA
·voip.ms
·Callcentric
| Re: Rate comparisons I'm not familiar with either Nordstrom's or Target, but I think I see where you are going, since I am familiar with walmart and kmart.
I disagree that there is a low-quality feel about VOIP.MS in comparison with callcentric (if that is in fact what you are implying).
If I had any reservations about VOIP.MS, they would be based on the question that I suspect most people have who use their own ATAs to hook up with a vosp, namely: Is this vosp going to be around in six months? Or: Is this vosp going to sound consistently good; will there be frequent outages?
I don't know the exact dates but I know that callcentric has been around longer than VOIP.MS; and with the present state of voip, you tend to get a warmer and fuzzier feeling with a vosp that has been around for 2 or 3 years compared to one that has been around for 1 or 2 years.
Personally, I don't have any problem with using VOIP.MS, or recommending it to other people, because I believe they are in it for the long haul. That's based on the improvements that they continue to make and the sophistication of their features - call routing, sub-accounts, etc., and on their consistent sound quality and reliability.
But I can understand why others would feel more comfortable with the longer track record of callcentric, even if it costs a bit more and has fewer features than VOIP.MS. | |
| | nitzan
Premium,VIP
join:2008-02-27
·ViaTalk
·Comcast
| said by PX Eliezer :CallCentric: Nordstrom Voip.MS: Target (in the good sense) Some others: Wal-Mart And others: K-Mart lmao. Out of curiosity- where does F9 fit in this "placement"?  | |
| | | fallingover
join:2008-12-28
Los Angeles, CA
·voip.ms
·Callcentric
| Re: Rate comparisons said by nitzan :said by PX Eliezer :CallCentric: Nordstrom Voip.MS: Target (in the good sense) Some others: Wal-Mart And others: K-Mart lmao. Out of curiosity- where does F9 fit in this "placement"? It's like one of those carts placed in the aisle of a mall. The ones that sell baskets of pre-packaged cheese and meat, or calendars, or pictures of sad-eyed children.
All useful to the right customer. | |
| | SteveinNC
join:2007-07-19
Greensboro, NC
1 edit | Callcentric Support +++ Last week I could not make outbound calls (busy signal) using my SPA2102.
How many hours is this going to take to figure this out ?
I looked at all the various screens, really it comes down to the SIP settings. Couldn't get a read on the problem and was ready to do a factory reset and add the values all over again.
Contacted CC support with the problem. Response in 20 min. They focused right in on the problem "SIP Remote Party I.D." drop down box should be set to "NO". The default setting was yes and for some reason it reverted to it.
There's only 150 drop down / settings on this ATA ? They got the fix right off the bat. Who would have known that ? I checked Linksys and Google. Not a blip about this setting.
I'm a little tired of the xxx hrs of sit down time figuring some of this out. Not with CC however.
Callcentric - Top Drawer VOIP. | |
| | fallingover
join:2008-12-28
Los Angeles, CA
·voip.ms
·Callcentric
| VOIP.MS Support A+++ said by SteveinNC :Callcentric - Top Drawer VOIP. I contacted VOIP.MS support because of a small problem I found in the IVR. Got a response in 15 minutes. They had it on their todo list, but pushed the fix out to their servers based on my email.
20 minutes after I contacted them, the problem had been fixed. I have never seen anything like it.
Callcentric support may be as good, or almost as good, but they don't even have an IVR, or simultaneous ring, or sub-accounts, or a 6-second billing increment, or calling queues, or a sophisticated website that puts every aspect of their service at your fingertips.
They do not begin to match VOIP.MS's call handling, and their North American rates and DID prices do not compete well with VOIP.MS's.
If you don't need the features that callcentric is missing, and you don't mind paying a bit more, then stick with callcentric, but I can't see it myself. | |
| | | PX Eliezer
Premium
join:2008-08-09
New Jersey
·Callcentric
·Optimum Voice
·callwithus
·voip.ms
| Re: Two good providers, two good nations. You raise several good points!
I agree that CC should try to incorporate some of those features. That's what good competition is about.
On the other hand, Voip.MS is not friendly to IP calling, peering, SIPBroker, or iNum. To me, these are very important features for providers, but of course perspectives differ.
I've never had any problems with CC. It just works.
Last year, I did have repeated problems with Voip.MS for outbound calls. I think that they have come a long way since then, and they have apparently beefed up their support.
I find CC's website to be quite functional and elegant. The Voip.MS website is rather turgid.
The thing is, they are BOTH fine providers, each with pros and cons. Sometimes you need both waffles and cereal (and fruit also---that's F9) as part of a balanced breakfast.
If I praise CallCentric, it should not be construed as knocking Voip.MS. They are both good folks.
In my personal interactions with CallCentric, they are almost fanatical about protecting the quality of their service. It strikes me that it's much more than a job for them. Now, that may also be true elsewhere, but I know it is for CC.
It also bespeaks a conservative attitude that may explain why they make changes carefully and gradually. Their primary concern is stability.
They actually do two things that make them lose business! Those are: a very conservative interpretation of 911 requirements, and urging people to not rush to port in numbers. CC probably drives some customers away because of this, but it reflects their almost religious fervor.
----------------------------------
Hopefully we will see both companies continue to lead and succeed. | |
| | | | |
| Forums » comments on review of Callcentric |
|
|
·
·