|
| |||||
| Home | Reviews | Tools | Forums | FAQs | Find Service | ISP News | Maps | About |
how-to block ads |
Remote Terminal (RT)
1 Remote Terminal (RT)
RT’s often go by many other names depending on the manufacturer, type, or region. Some common names are: RT, Slc or “slick”, Slc96 or “slick 96”, PairGain, Fujitsu, Series5, Remote Office, LightSpan, CEV (controlled environment vault), and they go on. A traditional RT should not be confused with a U-Verse VRAD. RT’s are not a new technology. Many Telcos have been using the technology for decades. RTs were originally used to serve high growth areas where there are limited copper facilities. RT’s come in many shapes sizes and capabilities. Most RTs in service today are not DSL capable. In the last decade or so, RT’s have been implemented to break the 18,000 foot DSL limitation from the central office and to serve people in outlying areas. The objective is to put the DSL equipment (DSLAM) closer to the subscriber, thus eliminating the distance limitation. Note: In some cases it is possible to be too far from an RT for DSL service.
by nunya Secondly, the RT may not be DSL capable. RT is referring to fiber basically like creating a CO closer to your prem. If you are an existing customer on "copper" coming from orginal CO then it's a pain to to switch over and keep the same POTS. If you don't mind changing your number then no problem otherwise GL and GODSPEED. 2011-05-16 21:33:47 by nunya "Project Lightspeed" is the new initiative. It will be replacing legacy DSL technology with FTTN (Fiber To The Node) or FTTP (Fiber To The Premise). Lightspeed will be placing the "node" within 3000 feet of served customers. RT's will still be deployed, but not in the traditional capacity. Lightspeed is currently being deployed in select areas. Corporate link - »att.sbc.com/gen/press-room?pid=5838
by nunya Ameritech: http://www.ameritech.com/ Nevada Bell: http://www.nevadabell.com/ Pacific Bell: http://www.pacbell.com/ SNET: http://www.snet.com/ Southwestern Bell: http://www.swbell.com/
by lolwhat old neighborhood orginal phone number for years and years POTS. old neighborhood new customer pair gain (pronto) i.e. RT. 2011-05-16 21:36:34 by nunya So, a C.O. based customer on a 6,000 foot loop would see better performance than an RT based customer with a 12,000 foot loop (to the RT). This works vice versa as well.
by nunya The only thing you can do that makes a difference is to put your name on the "waiting list" - (Please notify me when DSL is available in my area). Calling, writing, collecting signatures, protests and demonstrations are all a waste of time. The placement of RT's is a revenue driven procedure. Once an area shows the potential for profit, it will not be long before the Splicers arrive. You may think your area has good potential because of your desire for broadband; but in actuality there may be little interest or profit potential in the area. Contrary to popular belief, affluent neighborhoods do not necessarily get preferential treatment. Rich people pay just as much for DSL as poor people (sometimes less). If your are at your wits end and truly tired of waiting, might I suggest: »Wireless Service Providers
| |||||||||||
| Sunday, 12-Feb 07:49:38 | Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo over 12.5 years online! © 1999-2012 dslreports.com. |