|
| |||||
| Home | Reviews | Tools | Forums | FAQs | Find Service | ISP News | Maps | About |
how-to block ads |
DoctorPing
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Edit: Dr.Ping is now available. Dr. Ping now available again - - yes. But useful - - no.
It still has far too many servers no longer being pingable, resulting in no results. Thus, it should either be updated to functionality - - or simply tossed. by Pinan The lower the value (response time in milliseconds), the quicker your packets reach their destination. most simple direct explanation i have read. i cant use this but thanks. yes, i have several degrees, incl phd but too many write with lots of fog........ 2009-05-02 04:07:01 by lev Another way to locate the Dr. Ping page: From the navigation bar on the left side of the page, click on "Tools" - "DoctorPing (windows executable)" on the table. by Mike by Snake Eyes$ The good thing is Dr. Ping's results will put you in the general ballpark of your average latency. by Mike Then, just delete the file. (Use Start .. Search .. doctorping.exe on your entire C: or whatever drive, if you have lost where you placed the program.) Last, select the icon using the RIGHT button and find DELETE on the menu that pops up.
Dr. Ping should be able to download a list of known good IPs to use for pinging, to eliminate the problem of "there are a few dozen unpingables". I had this result: "Sorry, 119 pings gave errors or timeouts. 63 from 103 IPs were reachable. - no record will be made". Overall the Line Quality test showed my test was good with 0% packet loss from the East and West coasts, so should I presume that Dr. Ping is really standing on rickety legs here? If so, what's the point? It would be so easy to improve it to eliminate this "stale IP list" problem. | |||||||
| Monday, 08-Apr 12:32:21 | Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com. |