<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Road Runner forum - dslreports.com community</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/cable,rr</link>
<description>Road Runner forum current topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2007, dslreports.com</copyright>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:53:33 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:53:33 EDT</lastBuildDate>



<item>
<title>Trick the turbo?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23781626</link>
<description><![CDATA[I have the Turbo boost or whatever that is which downloads a file at a faster speed for a few seconds, then throttles back for the rest of the download.

How does this work? Is there a way to make the connection think it was stopped and started, so it starts downloading at the quicker rate again?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23781626</guid>
<pubDate>2010-02-10 03:11:49</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>What the heck is going on in SoCal - Part 3</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23199119</link>
<description><![CDATA[Despite some speed increases for selected SoCal areas, overall reliability and consistency seems to be worse.  A number of areas still experience significant evening slow-downs.  

It is totally unclear what Standard and Turbo are supposed to be for many/most areas.  Is there one document online at TWC that shows the real provisioned speed for any area, not some outdated information?  Accurate documentation is basically non-existant.  Is this on purpose or just ineptitude?  

TWC posted 2nd quarter revenues of $4.5 BILLION.  Their Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Glenn Britt, made $14,673,523.00 in compensation for 2008.

It is now over 2 years since TWC took over most of SoCal. 

Do not people think maybe it is time that TWC put some of this money into fixing these problems in SoCal?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23199119</guid>
<pubDate>2009-10-17 13:33:47</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Urgent help</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23768180</link>
<description><![CDATA[I have tried for a few months to tell time warner that there is something wrong with the internet but they cant find anything wrong. I am getting lagspikes and packetloss all over the place and it is random also.

I have done line quality tests and narrowed it down to one node in timewarner, does anyone have an idea of what to do?

here is the link http://www.dslreports.com/linequality/nil/2616145

The server that has the most issue is this one
ae3.lsanca4-rtr1.socal.rr.com&#9;29% Packetloss

There is always a high latency and high packetloss when it hits that node. does anyone have any approach to solving this?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23768180</guid>
<pubDate>2010-02-07 12:27:23</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Wideband speeds vary on PC vs PS3</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23772574</link>
<description><![CDATA[My speeds vary on PS3 vs PC, not sure why. Any settings I can optimize to correct this?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23772574</guid>
<pubDate>2010-02-08 13:33:35</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>USENET Access</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23746149</link>
<description><![CDATA[i recently moved and went from COX to Time Warner. I was just searching online and realized time warner doesnt have usenet access for free as they cut it off last year. My question is is there any free outsourcing they do? or any free alternatives? I dont have an extra 15-30 a month for usenet.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23746149</guid>
<pubDate>2010-02-03 01:18:13</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Latency issues (speeds looking fine though)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23773758</link>
<description><![CDATA[I've been talking back and forth with TWC about the issues I'm having since we got their RR HSI service (it's been about a week now).  Since it was installed, my ping times are (at least in my opinion) much higher than they should be.  The strange thing is I'm not suffering any loss of speed along with the increased latency.  The only time I suffer from speed loss is during peak hours (which is something the tech I spoke with didn't really seem to pick up on), and it's usually about half of what I should get.  The biggest problem is the latency though.  Any game played over the net is now at least at 100ms, if not more.  I had AT&T DSL before this, and could easily play PC and 360 games at a comfortable 50-70ms range.  

I've run several traceroutes before and during peak hours, along with speedtest results, and ping tests.  Aside from several timeouts to this website, there's really nothing popping out to me.  It just seems like a routing problem on their end.  For instance, running a speed test to NYC, I get a great ping time of 30ms.  If I do the same test to Lexington, KY, I get anywhere between 100-150ms.  That just doesn't seem right.  I know that servers can have problems, but this is just strange.  Testing to Ironton, OH returns pings in the 30s as well, but just about everywhere else is at least 90-100ms, if not more.  

I've been wondering if anyone else has experienced problems like this.  The only thing I've done on my end is check the wiring (which looks fine to me), do all of the generic 'reset your modem/router/etc.', and change my DNS servers to Verizon's (I switch between them and OpenDNS, not really seeing much difference).  I'm seeing better ping results with Verizon's servers, but the latency is still there for everything else.  Web browsing is OK, torrents are fine, downloads fine, it's just the latency.  I don't get it.  I assumed that maybe they were overloaded and there's just too many people in my area, but that still wouldn't make sense since not everyone is online all day, not to mention that would usually affect speed, not latency.

Anything else I should try or do I need to just show him the results and hope he sends someone to have a look on their side of things?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23773758</guid>
<pubDate>2010-02-08 17:01:06</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DCC :(</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23769209</link>
<description><![CDATA[Time Warner FINALLY fixed the upload problems with my neighbor's Internet connection (it was in their equipment) and everything was great-for about a week. Now to the latest problem-for the past week he loses his connection after periods ranging from 5 minutes to 7 hours, and has to reboot his modem for it to come back. The logs always say "DCC depart old" and "DCC arrive new" when this happens-and I see that the frequency keeps changing back and forth between 699 mHz and 705 mHz. He called support and they said his modem was bad (Motorola 5100)-so he bought a new modem last night and the same problem is still happening!

What gives? I find it hard to believe that a brand new modem would have the same problems as his old one.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23769209</guid>
<pubDate>2010-02-07 17:23:36</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>cisco 2600 to RR cable modem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23601917</link>
<description><![CDATA[I am trying to get my 2600 f0/0 interface to get a dhcp address from RR

the config is 
interface FastEthernet0/0
 description internet
 ip address dhcp
 ip accounting output-packets
 speed 100
 full-duplex

the router is also acting as a dhcp server for the lan side.
sho will the wan port have an issue grabing the dhcp from RR?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23601917</guid>
<pubDate>2010-01-06 21:06:45</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[TWC] Does TWC in Queens NY block any ports?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23775423</link>
<description><![CDATA[I've been able to get port 80 working but I am wondering about other ports like 443 (https)? 

I'm having some WHS trouble and I am trying to narrow down where the issue is.
--
~ Insert a Funny Sig Here ~]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23775423</guid>
<pubDate>2010-02-08 22:54:13</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>SLOW speeds STNY</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23578579</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anyone else in Elmira NY/ surrounding areas experiencing slow speeds?  With "turbo" I usually get at least 10mbps down, and up to 26mbps download speed at Speakeasy or speedtest.net. 

 Lately I am struggling to get 5mbps down and I am paying for the higher speed tier.  It's been this way for a week or so now with some breaks in the slowness where I see up to 9 or 10mbps download.  Upload is unchanged at around 970kbps.

Signal levels are fine, seems like a network issue. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23578579</guid>
<pubDate>2010-01-02 13:48:57</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
