<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Digital Imaging forum - dslreports.com community</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/dimaging</link>
<description>Digital Imaging forum current topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2007, dslreports.com</copyright>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:16:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:16:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>



<item>
<title>What&#x27;s New</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26859748</link>
<description><![CDATA[Years ago when I finally realized that all that was really happening whether you were using an Argus C3 or a Leica M3 was that a shutter was allowing an image to reach the film, which was the same in both cases. From that point on you were post-processing.
Nowadays, in our digital world, the same is true for all intents and purposes, except that the 'film' is no longer the same, but is pre-processed by the manufacturer. I don't know how important this is for those of us who shoot in RAW, which is a kind of basic film, which we then post-process.
I'm using an old D70 and am constantly wondering what would really be the difference if I got a D7000? Has digital technology really advanced that far? I know that there are advances in handling as well as in focus etc, but while they may be state of the art, they are not the 'art' itself, which may be essentially 'camera-free'.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26859748</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-06 12:54:38</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Talk about feeling small as a phtographer...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26854100</link>
<description><![CDATA[To have been the photographer on this had to have been an exceptional experience for anyone.  I don't know about anyone else, but this presentation, above many others I've seen, has made me feel even smaller in my huge world.  As the one doing the filming, I would have been speechless!

(This is a large d/l for those with slower connections.  Give it time, just wait for it to load.  It's well worth your time.)

http://www.videoman.gr/7402
--
JKK:-)

Age is a very high price to pay for my maturity. If I can't stay young, I can at least stay immature! 

http://www.pbase.com/jaykaykay

]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26854100</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-04 15:58:00</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Artify 377 SUPERBOWL special</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26848125</link>
<description><![CDATA[My turn as the current victim grateful contributor of Artify! :o

So Please have fun and enjoy.

Standard Rules as usual apply
--
*****aka The WIZARD *****A Founding member of Seti BBR Team Starfire***]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26848125</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-03 02:23:11</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[Help] Slightly off topic help needed</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26867406</link>
<description><![CDATA[Not exactly photography related, but I'm thinking you guys are the best bunch to ask, as the creativity here often goes far beyond just photography.  As photographers, most of us share our work online by various means, and take care to try to protect our work from theft and misuse as best we can given the nature of the internet.  But are there any means for writers to do the same?  As easy as it seems for images to be stolen, it seems it's even easier if writers were to share with others.  I'd really appreciate any insight any of you may have on this.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26867406</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-08 00:35:07</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Post a photo of something you ate today</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18942867</link>
<description><![CDATA[ :D  I have only ate one so far!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18942867</guid>
<pubDate>2007-08-24 16:53:18</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Scavenger Hunt #178. Jan 26th thru Feb 17th</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26815961</link>
<description><![CDATA[Scavenger Hunt #178. Jan 26th thru Feb 17th

Thanks uid://1153653 for choosing me to host the next hunt. The Super Bowl is around the corner, so we'll let this one go an extra week since some of you will be wrapped up in those festivities. And maybe some of you will find this a great subject for this weeks topic... who knows?

Last time we saw 'What brings you peace?'. This time, try to show us "What your Pet Peeve is!!  What irritates you most"

&#149; Photos must be taken during the hunt time frame. No archived photos allowed.
&#149; You may post as many entries as you wish, no larger than 1024 pixels on the longest side.
&#149; The person starting the hunt chooses the most creative photo and then passes the torch to the winner.
&#149; The winner will host the next hunt.
&#149; This hunt runs until Feb 17th, 2012.
&#149; Have fun!
--
Occasionally I suffer Blond moments.....
Canon 7D, 400D, CP4500, Canon G11 (and some nifty lenses)
 http://www.pbase.com/camare]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26815961</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-26 12:08:03</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[FYI] Not Made Here</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26800961</link>
<description><![CDATA[For more years than I can remember I always wondered why there were no American manufacturers of high quality photographic equipment and cameras. I can remember Kodak's relationship with the German camera industry (Kodak Retina) but not much more.
Today in the NY Times I read an article about Apple Computers (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/business/apple-america-and-a-squeezed-middle-class.html?hpw, which points out the ways in which an American Company is essentially foreign-based, at least on the manufacturing end.
I'm interested in what you think are the reasons for this development in electronics and cameras, and whether or not you believe that we will ever get this manufacturing capability back, or have we advanced so far into what some people call crony-capitalism that it will never happen. I suspect that the 'bottom line' mentality may not really be all that American, after all.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26800961</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-22 19:53:35</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>This struck a nerve to wedding and or any photographer..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26818723</link>
<description><![CDATA[http://seattle.craigslist.org/kit/evs/2804332414.html

WHY is finding an amazing wedding photographer so difficult? :/

I am a Bride who is getting married this summer and have yet to find a decently priced, exceptional, amazingly talented, fun photographer.

WHY because the word "WEDDING" is involved photographers think they can change you $ 3,000.00 for wedding photos? Oh, because no bride is going to go without so they are going to pay it, because they HAVE to. They are ripping people off for all they have! Why when you want to get married it costs you AT LEAST 15 grand after all is said-and-done? Its such CRAP!! I love all you $ 3,000.00 photographers out there but i think your prices are WACK. All your doing is hanging out at a wedding taking tons of photos and editing them.. and thats owrth 3 GRAND!!! You're making so much money its crazy. I just wish people would be more realistic. I mean the "average" persons salary for 1 freaking month is somewhere around 3 grand. (Thats making 19$ an hour) So you're going to take someones WHOLE MONTH paycheck for one flippen day of photos? Just because you CAN!!?????? So that maybe they will not be able to feed themselves or pay any other bills they have, right? It makes me SICK! 

I know im speaking for more than just myself right now. Alot of brides out there think the same thing. & I bet all you fancy photographers wont even read this. oh-well.
Maybe there are cheaper photographers that will read this and LOVE to take my photos :) 

===============================

judging from the popularity on google, looks like she'll get a whole lot of attention now...

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=pfwl&cp=46&gs_id=48&xhr=t&q=why+is+finding+an+amazing+photographer+so+difficult&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&pbx=1&oq=why+is+finding+an+amazing+photographer+so+diff&aq=0w&aqi=q-w2&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=4429bcaa89d38f08&biw=1280&bih=605]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26818723</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-26 22:58:24</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title> Transformer Owl</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26850689</link>
<description><![CDATA[This little owl is amazing.To ensure it doesn't get eaten by larger owls it goes through a transformation to frighten them way.
Please ignore the techno music that accompanies this video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFwgblszf6s&feature=share
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/peter_ireland/

As I get older I think I am developing more patience. Turns out I just don't give a SHIT!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26850689</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-03 15:42:14</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>OK - which diamond is bigger?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26837840</link>
<description><![CDATA[I know it might be hard to tell; at least to me it is. Asking your guys' expertise here. I tried to take a decent ratio photo. Not going to say which is which, just asking opinions.
--
My brother, Michael: "Kev, guess how fast my GTI topped out at?" "How fast?" "137." "Wow!" "Guess who else goes that fast?" "Who?" "Connecticut State Police."]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26837840</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-01 01:25:52</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Groundhog Day</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26842792</link>
<description><![CDATA[Will he see his shadow? :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26842792</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-02 00:30:39</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Artify 376</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26817555</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hank has ask me to host this weeks Artify. You know the rules. 1024 on the longest side is the only rule I know of.
I hope you enjoy working with these.
 
[att=1]

[att=2]

[att=3]

[att=4]
--
He had a photographic memory which was never developed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26817555</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-26 17:55:52</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Bayshore Arts Festival</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26826379</link>
<description><![CDATA[There was some great entertainment at the Festival, including Casey Weston, a really great 19 year old country singer, and Rebecca Richardson, a first class jazz vocalist. It was great listening and fun to shoot. 

See http://www.bayshorecapa.org/Bayshore_Festival_of_the_arts_2012.htm ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26826379</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-28 23:03:10</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>PS Run Amok...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26635226</link>
<description><![CDATA[Even the best run into Photoshop Disasters:

http://www.psdisasters.com/]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26635226</guid>
<pubDate>2011-12-08 15:05:27</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Sunset photographer</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26818902</link>
<description><![CDATA[This fellow was enthralled with the sunset ..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26818902</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-27 00:01:33</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[No Edit] Cell Phone Pictures?!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26174946</link>
<description><![CDATA[Figured we needed a cellphone picture thread. Try to post one per day, but not junk folks. Let's try to post the best we can take! Current phones can take some amazing shots! No computer editing allowed though. However editing done on Your phone is acceptable! 

Here's my first one from yesterday. Taken with an HTC EVO. 
[att=1] 

Now, let's yours. Please list make and model as well. 
--
Images are Copyrighted and use is NOT permitted.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26174946</guid>
<pubDate>2011-08-07 01:08:44</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[FYI] Similar, but not copied, image found to breach copyright</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26817965</link>
<description><![CDATA[ said by dpreview :Amateur Photographer magazine has published an interesting story about a copyright infringement case of similar, but not directly copied, images. The issue of copyright is thorny, contentious and often misunderstood but this case sheds some light on the current attitude of courts in the UK. Despite significant differences between the two images (there was no implication that the second image was a duplicate of the first), the court found that the second image copied substantially from the 'intellectual creation' of the first (that is the elements that can be protected by copyright in the original image, including a consideration of the composition, lighting and processing of the image).

http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/01/25/Imitated_Image_Copyright_Case]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26817965</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-26 19:24:47</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[Retouch] Any saving this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26818731</link>
<description><![CDATA[Friend took this picture of her Twins that didn't come out quite right. Can anybody here help it out? I know there's not a lot to work with, but I've seen some miracles on here.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26818731</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-26 23:00:13</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Filming Under Fire Gets Oscar Nod filmed with DSLR cameras</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26822212</link>
<description><![CDATA[Shot entirely with dslr cameras
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/around-the-world-abc-news/filming-under-fire-gets-oscar-nod-021250143.html
--
He had a photographic memory which was never developed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26822212</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-27 17:08:31</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[Retouch] Old Photo Help</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26825617</link>
<description><![CDATA[It wasn't the greatest shot but it's the only one of my old bike I can find. This is a 1948 Harley frame with a 1954 Panhead motor and a Triumph front end. Picture taken in 1975 and it is beginning to rot. Scanned in 2006.

I would like to see if anyone can get the focus, contrast and colors correct. 

Thanks.
[att=1]]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26825617</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-28 18:09:08</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

