<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Digital Imaging Technology forum - dslreports.com community</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/dphardware</link>
<description>Digital Imaging Technology forum current topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2007, dslreports.com</copyright>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:27:28 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:27:28 EDT</lastBuildDate>



<item>
<title>Beauty Shoot for &#x22;Citizen K&#x22; Magazine &#x22;How Did I Do It?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23378303</link>
<description><![CDATA[Beauty Shoot for "Citizen K" Magazine "How Did I Do It?"

Recently, I received an e-mail from someone who saw my image on my introduction page of my blog, asking "...how did you do it?"  I will not include what he speculated, which was actually quite close.

For those of you wishing to participate, I would like you to tell me, what you think I did.  I will eventually tell you all the technique I employed for this particular beauty story shot for "Citizen K International".

So, go ahead and tell me what your impressions are.  Post your answer on the Forum and on my Blog. That way, everyone who has participated can see all of the responses.

Thanks
Ben

http://www.benjaminkanarekblog.com/2009/11/22/beauty-shoot-for-citizen-k-magazine-asked-how-did-i-do-it/]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23378303</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-22 08:55:16</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Decent point and shoot</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23379650</link>
<description><![CDATA[Need a decent Point and Shoot camera.   Need something with good performance and battery life.  Something the wife can keep in diaper bag.  Say around $150

The Rebel XT just does cut it for that.   :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23379650</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-22 16:35:49</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[Cam] Canon SX120 or Kodak Easyshare 10.0 MP</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23380536</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi looking to buy a new camera for a trip I'm taking. It's a sporting event and I will need to take some photos from approx 50-75 ft if needed. Was looking to spend $200 or less. Specifically between these 2 which is the better performer for the money?

Canon PowerShot SX120 IS Black 10.0 MP 3.0" 230K LCD 10X Optical Zoom Digital Camera 
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16830120379  $199

Kodak - EasyShare 10.0-Megapixel Digital Camera - Black
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Kodak+-+EasyShare+10.0-Megapixel+Digital+Camera+-+Black/9282055.p?id=1218073821264&skuId=9282055
 $179 + 10% off = $160

Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23380536</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-22 20:21:30</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Copyright Filing Heads Up.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23372479</link>
<description><![CDATA[Recently I had a copyright infringement problem with a &#147;respectable&#148; organization who &#147;assumed&#148; they could freely distribute a single use non-exclusive copy of my work and to add salt to a wound they went a step further and changed the credits so it looked like they produced the work.

Once discovering this infringement I sent them a nastygram reminding them of the limits of the license and included a cease and desist notice against any further unauthorized distribution of my work.

They played dumb and responded with a semi cryptic response that they will include in any future distributions proper credit.

Since I know playing dumb is buying time and knowing the next step will probably involve litigation I decided to &#147;officially&#148; register the work with the United States Copyright Office as even though my company holds the Copyright not having the work officially registered limits my ability to nail the infringer to the wall financially.

Now it has been years since I registered any works and here is the really cool part, I discovered, the U.S. Copyright now accepts on-line registrations including the ability to upload ones work(s) and the price is only $35.

Whoo Hoo that is very reasonable compared to the old price that was something like $150 and required mailing an actual copy of the work to the office.

As such one could literally take an entire collection of works compile them into a file that meets the requirements of a 1 hour up-load and have a legal and properly registered Copyright on every image or video within that work.

This literally makes an actionable copyright practical and within anyone&#146;s budget.

Registration is simple and yes they do take plastic for a payment. 

http://www.copyright.gov/eco/

Have fun and keep what is yours, yours.

Wayne 
--
If you cannot fix it with a buttset and some beanies you're not a technician.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23372479</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-20 19:07:20</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Nikon D3000 Tamron AF compatibility</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23376240</link>
<description><![CDATA[A friend just bought a D3000 with a kit lens.  I have a Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD collecting dust that I offered up, but it's not auto-focusing for him.  Tried cleaning the contacts and briefly looking through the camera settings, but couldn't come up with anything other than a suspicion that the camera doesn't like the lens.  The lens works fine on my D200.

Google helped me find a forum note that the D3000 needs a version of the lens with a built-in motor. http://forums.steves-digicams.com/nikon-dslr/162012-d3000-compatiable-lenses.html  That make no sense to me since the focus motors are always in the lens, right?.  Nothing else I found was definitive and there are plenty of places bundling that lens with the D3000.

1. What's the real scoop?

2. If there are two versions of the Tamron, how can I tell which I have?

Thanks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23376240</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-21 18:32:23</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>I want a new camera!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23293898</link>
<description><![CDATA[I have a nice "point and shoot" Canon camera, it takes good pictures in my mind, but I would like to extend this more.

I don't want a fancy 1000 dollar camera, but I would like once I  can choose a lens (wide, and or good zooming) but takes good clear pictures also. 
I am not a heavy or fancy picture taker, but I hope if I have something to use, I will get better. 

Ideas welcome! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23293898</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-04 22:47:23</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[Cam] Pentax Image Stabil</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23306345</link>
<description><![CDATA[I'm looking at upgrading my *ist to a K-x. The extra MP's would be nice, but it's the image stabilization that I'm really interested in.

I know Pentax was late to the whole IS thing, but how well have they done with it? I'm going to get a Bigma to go with it, and I'm curious how well Pentax's IS fares with a Bigma at 500mm. As good as any other camera manufacturer? Better? Worse?

Edit: I've been out of the photography loop for awhile, so I kinda don't know what all is going on anymore. Got some catching up to do. :huh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23306345</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-07 13:04:31</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[Cam] Viewing shots on computer</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23371174</link>
<description><![CDATA[I have the Rebel xt/350d and was wondering if there is any way to connect the camera to a computer so I can view the shots right after they are taken. Kind of like they do in the photo studio's at sears, etc. I have photoshop cs3 if that can be used somehow.
Thanks in advance for any help.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23371174</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-20 15:14:51</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>The One, The Only...Box Shot Thread! (part three)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18763292</link>
<description><![CDATA[Along with a few other little goodies...

Continued from:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,13516915
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16226224]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18763292</guid>
<pubDate>2007-07-28 04:53:46</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Pentax K-7... your opinion?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23366425</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anyone bought it? How do you like it, compared to older Pentax models?

Reviews seem to like it, I have pretty much outgrew my K10D... I need better ISO performance, but above all, faster AF... I really hate sometimes how the AF on my K10D is incredibly slow, and since I do a lot of indoor shooting where the only light source is the modeling lights, it can be frustrating.

The fact it records HD would just be icing, I'm basically looking in better ISO performance, faster AF. Reviews say it's faster, I'd like to know from users who actually held it in their hands and experienced the camera!

Thanks!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23366425</guid>
<pubDate>2009-11-19 17:01:11</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
