<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>IPv6 forum - dslreports.com community</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/ipv6</link>
<description>IPv6 forum current topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2007, dslreports.com</copyright>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:02:05 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:02:05 EDT</lastBuildDate>



<item>
<title>IPv6 geolocation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26765533</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hi,
I will create works on:

"Solutions geolokalizacyjne for emergency services in IPv6 networks"

Maybe this will explain very briefly what it was ...
Assuming that we only ever pass on the IP communications, and which is probably inevitable to IPv6, and what you see today will increase mobility, we have to cope with the exact geolocalisation.

Today in the era of mobile and landline phones are fast enough geolocation and precise.

But what about the location of the IP when someone calls for help or when someone has a "medical equipment" with a network module and needs help?

Current measurement (eg, pings), without measuring (eg databases) and hybrid location methods usually give a result of an area of &#8203;&#8203;hundreds or thousands km ^ 2 - which is useless for emergency services, and sufficient for marketing purposes.

----------------
VoIP operators in the present moment the registration number to ask for your address data and change them when a person moves .... know how it is - there is no time or simply forgotten about it ....

You may remember in different ways, but how sure are true? if you can force a user to enter such data in general?
-----------------

What's your opinion on IPv6 can improve or increase the accuracy of geolocation?
(DNS? DHCP? Header fields? Ext headers? Routing protocols for IPv6? ICMPv6? Neighbor discovery protocol? ...?)

Also looking for a suitable literature  (geolocation, IPv6, VoIP)
and the parties and for the above topics.

I would like to know your point of view ...

PS: Please do not discuss in this theme about whether everything will soon move to IPv6 (though I assume it without command)

Thank you in advance for statements, suggestions, ideas, tips, and sources of knowledge

(Sorry for my English :p)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26765533</guid>
<pubDate>2012-01-13 13:18:14</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>why do cable modems need ipv6 support ?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26571280</link>
<description><![CDATA[I was under the impression that cable modem were layer 2 devices with the only need for an IP address being a non-routable management IP. I don't understand why I see statements on IPv6 deployments from various ISPs saying you must have an IPv6 compatible modem.  Wouldn't that only hold true if they are modifying the cable modem's management IPs to IPv6? Can someone clarify this for me?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26571280</guid>
<pubDate>2011-11-20 02:37:00</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>FreeBSD IPv6:  Running rtsol on an IPv6 Router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26860412</link>
<description><![CDATA[So my ISP (Teksavvy) supports native IPv6 right now.  To do this, they send RA packets.  My FreeBSD and / or Windows host are able to connect without configuration, using RA / RS.  I am encapsulating my packets over PPPoE on interface tun0

However, when I turn on ipv6 routing by putting "ipv6_gateway_enable="YES" in rc.conf, rtsol (Router Solicitation daemon, required to acquire WAN ip address) refuses to run.  This disables me getting an IP address.

When I try to run "rtsol tun0", i get the following messages
rtsol: kernel is configured not to accept RAs
rtsol: kernel is configured as a router, not a host

Any ideas on how to have my system setup as a router while receiving router solicitations on my WAN interface?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26860412</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-06 15:35:28</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>IPv6 for residential users</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26845886</link>
<description><![CDATA[What options are available to connect to the ipv6 Internet, based on the following scenario:

- no ISP and no router support for IPv6

- no ISP but IPv6 capable router

- ISP but no IPv6 capable router

 

I would like to find out all the possible mechanisms to connect to the internet using IPv6, based on the scenarios above. I currently find myself in the first situation and I managed to connect using tunnel broker and Teredo. What other ways are available to connect for each situation?

 

Thank you]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26845886</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-02 15:54:36</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Got a tunnel from SixXS...how do i route it to my lan?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26846534</link>
<description><![CDATA[So i got a tunnel from SixXS and the tunnel is up.  It is a static tunnel directly into my Cisco router and i am able to ping and traceroute IPV6 sites from my Cisco.  Now here is my question,

Hurricane Electric will route you a /64 to your tunnel point to point /64 so you can use IPV6 on your internal Lan.  SixXS does not do that right away...is their a way i can use IPV6 on my internal Lan without getting routed a /64?  I'm thinking their must be a way, or they wouldn't route you a /64 to begin with...since that's more IP's than people on the earth.  

Thanks all!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26846534</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-02 18:00:29</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ONT&#x27;s and IPv6</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26844990</link>
<description><![CDATA[Quick question we all know IPv6 is coming and there is equipment that is IPv6 ready, but what about Optical Network Terminals?  Do they have to be replaced with a IPv6 ONT? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,26844990</guid>
<pubDate>2012-02-02 13:10:19</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

