pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD | It Must Be Easy To Use
Once Internet Video is as easy to watch as changing channels on a TV, then it will take off in popularity.
--
Blagojevich / Madoff 2012! |
|
cableties
Premium
join:2005-01-27
 ·Verizon FIOS
| Yep. I got a laugh at the commercial for HULU. On FiOS. Dennis Leary is an alien...
HULU...let me see...I give it...2 years...tops...till someone buys it. Oh wait, what a great idea! Let's figure out how to get rights to stuff, then repackage the stuff and then sell the stuff! |
|
bamabrad
join:2006-01-27
Port Orange, FL | Stats can show ANYTHING
I wonder how much video is moved using IP-whether in a company's walled garden or across the open net-same difference? |
|
BF69
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN
1 edit | reply to cableties
Re: It Must Be Easy To Use
said by cableties  :Yep. I got a laugh at the commercial for HULU. On FiOS. Dennis Leary is an alien... HULU...let me see...I give it...2 years...tops...till someone buys it. Oh wait, what a great idea! Let's figure out how to get rights to stuff, then repackage the stuff and then sell the stuff! You obviously don't have any idea who own's Hulu. NBC, FOX, Disney among others. There's no rights to get since they already own the rights. |
|
t0KE
join:2003-07-03
| 1% of total US video consumption
This stat has got to be numbers of people, or hours of viewing or something like that.
Also, it's probably reasonable to assume that the % of total Internet traffic consumed by streaming video exceeds 1%.
I'm not sure if the 2 stats are directly relatable, but something nags at me that this is an indicator of how internet bandwidth is used relative to what is available.
Are internet users who are watching something that is otherwise available on CATV/Satellite spectrum actually doing the Internet community a disservice? |
|
old_wiz_60
join:2005-06-03
Bedford, MA | Nice idea, but...
This could be wrecked by the ISPs starting to bill you via usage. When you get cable TV, for example, you can leave it on 24x7 and you're fine. If you tried that with your internet connection you'd be kicked off. |
|
blips
join:2001-04-17
Addison, IL
1 edit | said by old_wiz_60 :This could be wrecked by the ISPs starting to bill you via usage. When you get cable TV, for example, you can leave it on 24x7 and you're fine. If you tried that with your internet connection you'd be kicked off. I agree. Innovation on the internet will be completely stifled by ISP caps. Internet video will go no where fast. Don't expect the percentage of people downloading from the internet jump significantly. |
|
BlitzenZeus
Burnt Out Cynic
Premium,MVM
join:2000-01-13
Beaverton, OR
·Verizon FIOS
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| Nielsen ratings are off
Quite a few people leave their cable boxes running 24/7 skewing the results, the show we watch on the web sometimes are the ones we really want to watch as we might not have a dvr, and that is where sites like hulu come in.
Sure web video isn't full 720p, or 1080p that was being broadcast, but most of us don't care, they still get their commercials in while we get to watch the shows we want on our schedule.
I don't see this going away, the model works, and I found that sites like hulu post content days before cable networks get these same shows up on the video on demand.
--
My hourly rates:
$25 per hour.
$35 per hour if you want to watch.
$45 per hour if you want to help.
$75 per hour if you tried to fix it, and failed.
$125 per hour if you called tech support, and didn't fix the issue while making things worse |
|
beerbum
Premium
join:2000-05-06
Reading, PA
clubs:
| reply to blips
Re: Nice idea, but...
said by blips :said by old_wiz_60 :This could be wrecked by the ISPs starting to bill you via usage. When you get cable TV, for example, you can leave it on 24x7 and you're fine. If you tried that with your internet connection you'd be kicked off. I agree. Innovation on the internet will be completely stifled by ISP caps. Internet video will go no where fast. Don't expect the percentage of people downloading from the internet jump significantly. Why do you think Comcast started the trend by implimenting their 250GB cap..?
I've said this over and over again to the point of sounding like a broken record over the years - Cable companies such as Comcast see Internet video as a direct threat to their video monopolies - and will do everything they can to keep Internet Video to just being a very small niche that is no threat to them. |
|
BF69
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN
| reply to blips
said by blips :said by old_wiz_60 :This could be wrecked by the ISPs starting to bill you via usage. When you get cable TV, for example, you can leave it on 24x7 and you're fine. If you tried that with your internet connection you'd be kicked off. I agree. Innovation on the internet will be completely stifled by ISP caps. Internet video will go no where fast. Don't expect the percentage of people downloading from the internet jump significantly. Caps are temporary. In a couple of years or less they will either go away or be high enough that it's not an issue. Even right now to go over Comcast's 250 GB you'd have to watch 9.5 hours of video a day assuming it's streamed at 2 Mbps which most video isn't streamed anywhere near that. |
|
ITALIAN926
join:2003-08-16
Stratford, CT | reply to blips
Absolutely right, TVip has absolutely no future, dont invest your money in it. The only people who will offer TVip will be the ISP's themselves. |
|
Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
| reply to cableties
Re: It Must Be Easy To Use
said by cableties :Yep. I got a laugh at the commercial for HULU. On FiOS. Dennis Leary is an alien... HULU...let me see...I give it...2 years...tops...till someone buys it. Oh wait, what a great idea! Let's figure out how to get rights to stuff, then repackage the stuff and then sell the stuff! You know Hulu was started by NBC and Fox right? So they already have the rights. |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
| reply to BlitzenZeus
Re: Nielsen ratings are off
Another take on this subject:
»gigaom.com/2009/05/29/the-stream···-it-yet/
Over the past 12 months, we’ve seen a lot of new content offerings announced by companies like Netflix, Amazon and YouTube as they look to directly target the living room via entertainment devices. Indeed, the adoption rate of hardware devices like the Xbox 360, PS3, TiVo, Roku, VUDU, Apple TV and broadband-enabled Blu-ray players and TV sets will be crucial in determining if content owners can make money delivering video to the TV.
But despite all these new offerings, that content still only reaches a few million customers, a number largely unchanged from this time last year. Such low adoption rates in the face of so much effort leads me to think that while the market of delivering content to the TV will grow, it is unlikely to do so at the rate that many in this industry would like to believe. In fact I don’t think we’ll see these devices having a combined impact in any measurable way for at least another 3-4 years.......... It will grow very slowly until the average, non-tech person can watch it on their TV by hooking up only 1 box(including the already existing cable or telco linear TV capabilities) no more complicated then the existing STBs.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
BF69
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN
| said by TKJunkMail :Another take on this subject: » gigaom.com/2009/05/29/the-stream···-it-yet/Over the past 12 months, we’ve seen a lot of new content offerings announced by companies like Netflix, Amazon and YouTube as they look to directly target the living room via entertainment devices. Indeed, the adoption rate of hardware devices like the Xbox 360, PS3, TiVo, Roku, VUDU, Apple TV and broadband-enabled Blu-ray players and TV sets will be crucial in determining if content owners can make money delivering video to the TV.
But despite all these new offerings, that content still only reaches a few million customers, a number largely unchanged from this time last year. Such low adoption rates in the face of so much effort leads me to think that while the market of delivering content to the TV will grow, it is unlikely to do so at the rate that many in this industry would like to believe. In fact I don’t think we’ll see these devices having a combined impact in any measurable way for at least another 3-4 years.......... It will grow very slowly until the average, non-tech person can watch it on their TV by hooking up only 1 box(including the already existing cable or telco linear TV capabilities) no more complicated then the existing STBs. Ironcially this idea was tried over 10 years ago. It was called WebTv. Of course it failed because back then people said no one would want to access the internet from their TV. |
|
axiomatic
join:2006-08-23
Tomball, TX
| Bust open the caps!
Internet video streaming providers need to bust open the caps. If I were a Hulu or a Sling.com or YouTube (or especially an advertiser using one of these streaming services to advertise) I would be looking to start lobbying for the removal of these caps citing anti-competitive reasons. In my opinion we are well past the point of all of those "net neutrality" concerns we all had years ago. It's happening, competition is being stifled by ISP caps and streaming services are being stifled by these caps. I'm ready for the shouting to begin in earnest. |
|
moon1234
@tds.net
| These numbers lie
I am part of a Nielson survey family. We get the little books once or twice a year. There is NO PLACE to record the amount of time or type of content you watch online.
This must be a complete guess on their part to pander to those they sell the ratings too. |
|
RARPSL
join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY
| said by moon1234 :
I am part of a Nielson survey family. We get the little books once or twice a year. There is NO PLACE to record the amount of time or type of content you watch online.
This must be a complete guess on their part to pander to those they sell the ratings too.
I agree. If I go to HULU to watch a show, that can be measured and is a more VALID measure than Nielson's book that does not allow you to list what and when you watch as well as only showing what you claim to watch not what you actually watch. Also it does not allow for timeshifting (ie: Having your DVD/TiVo watch/record the show for you to see later). If there are 2 or 3 shows airing at the same time and you want to watch all of them, you must either DVR/TiVo Timeshift or go to HULU for the shows you can not record. |
|
RARPSL
join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY
| reply to Matt
Re: It Must Be Easy To Use
said by Matt :said by cableties :Yep. I got a laugh at the commercial for HULU. On FiOS. Dennis Leary is an alien... HULU...let me see...I give it...2 years...tops...till someone buys it. Oh wait, what a great idea! Let's figure out how to get rights to stuff, then repackage the stuff and then sell the stuff! You know Hulu was started by NBC and Fox right? So they already have the rights. HULU allows the Networks to stream their shows and not need to do it from their own Site's Servers (although some shows do come from Network Site's Servers. Also, the viewer numbers that can be collected via HULU and the Sites are more accurate than those that Nielsen provides since there is a larger sample and a more targeted one. In a recent article on Show Renewals I saw a comment that some shows with so-so Nielsen ratings were renewed due to strong streaming numbers. There is also the fact that the Steaming Numbers are more accurate since they represent actual viewing (since they are in essence VoD numbers) while the Nielsen numbers are inaccurate due to shows airing opposite each other or at inconvenient times (or not being aired at the scheduled time due to a prior show "running over" its allocated slot). |
|
DaMaGeINC
The Lan Man
Premium
join:2002-06-08
Greenville, SC
clubs: | 100%
Of my video comes from the internet. I dont watch tv whatsoever. Cant stand it, all the commercials and crap. Its brainwashing. |
|
Zen6
@myvzw.com | reply to BF69
Re: Nielsen ratings are off
The problem with web tv was the dial up connection and poor video quality. This technology is gaining acceptance much to the dismay of the cap happy companies. |
|
