Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Dozens of AT&T/Verzion Wiretap Suits Dismissed
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2009-06-04 08:57:20: Given Obama's support for telecom company immunity for handing over consumer data wholesale to the NSA without a warrant, it wasn't particularly surprising to see the administration perpetuate the Bush Administration's positions on domestic wiretappi.. ..

page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5
AuthorAll Replies


sirwoogie
Blah
Premium
join:2002-01-02
Carleton, MI
Change

...we can believe in.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

 Good

Private industries that can provide assist the government in national security matters need some kind of cover from lawsuits or else they won't be bothered to cooperate with the government when their help is needed.

Has the EFF or anyone actually proved that our rights were abused or are they still just blowing smoke?
--
Blagojevich / Madoff 2012!


Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..


1 edit
reply to sirwoogie
Re: Change

said by sirwoogie See Profile :

...we can believe in.
Oh, never seen that one before. You're clever!

While this pisses me off to no end, if you thought every single thing in Washington was going to change, you (not you specifically) are a fool. A lot has changed and a lot already is changing, but unfortunately this didn't and I hope the EFF is able to win this battle.

Psst, the judge who dismissed it was appointed by Bushie the 1st: »www.fjc.gov/servlet/tGetInfo?jid=2483

expert007

join:2006-01-10
Buffalo, NY
Yeah, I'm not happy about this one (understatement), but I'm looking at the bigger picture. Which is undoubtedly changing for the better. I haven't taken an in-depth look at these cases yet, but I really believe that this was just plain wrong.


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to pnh102
Re: Good

said by pnh102 See Profile :

Private industries that can provide assist the government in national security matters need some kind of cover from lawsuits or else they won't be bothered to cooperate with the government when their help is needed.

No harm was done to any US citizens. The EFF & ACLU are on a witch hunt and are just looking to punish monetarily AT&T & Verizon in order to earn fees for their organizations. Call it the "Full employment for class action lawyers" lawsuit.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page

cafields

join:2003-12-17
Muncie, IN


1 edit
 reply to pnh102
no ones, as you say, blowing smoke. I decided not to vote for obama, after hillary dropped out, then obama voted to give full immunity to the telecoms for illegal wiretapping, before that at two or more of his BS speeches, he said he would never give immunity to the telecoms for illegal wiretapping.

IanR

join:2001-03-22
Madison, NJ


1 edit
Let me understand the legal ruling here.

Seemingly it's OK to break the law so long as it's in national security interest.
Surely that's an oxymoron?
So in this court's mind who has the authority to decide whether it's in the national security interests? Since this ruling has now allowed the bypassing of Federal Judges, who could/should have been asked for warrants. So that legal authority has now been assumed by some faceless entity?

What legal nonsense is this? A Judge has ruled that Federal Judges are an inappropriate authority to make quick rulings on warrants!!!!!


woody7
Premium
join:2000-10-13
Torrance, CA
reply to TKJunkMail
Re: Good

Name change, but still the same
--
BlooMe

mlundin

join:2001-03-27
Lawrence, KS
·Sunflower Broadband
·Comcast

reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

No harm was done to any US citizens.
BULLSHIT. Harm is done to EVERY US citizen EVERY time a right is violated. How many rights are you willing to give away before you don't have any left? My answer is none, and so I have been harmed.


major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:

reply to IanR
Re: Let me understand the legal ruling here.

said by IanR See Profile :

Seemingly it's OK to break the law so long as it's in national security interest.

Let me break it down for you. Telecom immunity = Certain persons, including the non-carbon kind that are incorporated in the Caymans so they don't have to pay U.S. taxes - are above the law.
--
The Toll

Tracking Lord Stanley

jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL
·surpasshosting
·ViaTalk

reply to Matt
Re: Change

said by Matt See Profile :

A lot has changed and a lot already is changing
Other than even more government spending and waste, I haven't seen much change.

lordofwhee

join:2007-10-21
Everett, WA
reply to IanR
Re: Let me understand the legal ruling here.

Remember, when the .gov does it, it's not illegal.

I guess we just elected Richard Nixon three times in a row...

MTU
Premium
join:2005-02-15
San Luis Obispo, CA
·AT&T Yahoo

Scared in Power

Face it, big-brother has been listening and recording everything for decades. Unfortunately, the agencies (NSA, FBI, CIA) have not shared info until post disaster. The inevitable 'next attack' no doubt influences recent decisions. Politicians fear the 'blame' game and thus, continue ignoring and bending the law. Our intelligence agencies depend on listening-in to all communications as assets on-the-ground have limited success with the bad-guy's organizations, and are expensive. Thus, the vacuum-cleaner approach. What's really bad is that this 'casualness' to following the law and constitution is becoming SOP.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

reply to mlundin
Re: Good

said by mlundin See Profile :

Harm is done to EVERY US citizen EVERY time a right is violated.
How has harm been done to you personally?
--
Blagojevich / Madoff 2012!

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

said by pnh102 See Profile :

How has harm been done to you personally?
are you actually curious about how he was personally harmed, or do you just not care about the constitution?


Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

reply to jester121
Re: Change

said by jester121 See Profile :

said by Matt See Profile :

A lot has changed and a lot already is changing
Other than even more government spending and waste, I haven't seen much change.
You see what you want to see. If you don't want to see any, you won't. If you look at the educational, scientific, economic, and worldwide perception changes that have taken place already, you might have a different perspective.


funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype


1 edit
reply to pnh102
Re: Good

said by pnh102 See Profile :

Has the EFF or anyone actually proved that our rights were abused or are they still just blowing smoke?
Congress voted for telecom immunity BECAUSE IT HAPPENED. There would be no need for telecom immunity if EFF just made it up.

EFF is 100% right here. The US Gov't exceeded its rights under the Constitution, infringing on the rights of the people guaranteed in the Constitution. To provide immunity, the government can't simply make unconstitutional law and call it "good," it has to change the constitution itself.

Was I harmed individually? No, but since when is that a criteria? We The People were harmed, collectively, by a government which exceeded its bounds.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- District of Columbia -- KJ7RL

lesopp

join:2001-06-27
Land O Lakes, FL

reply to mlundin
Would that apply to the rights of 401k holders whose 401k's included bonds with GM & Chrysler? Savings and investment plans further decimated by Obama contrary to standing US law, essentially denying due process and equal protection to the evil investors in order to payback the UAW.

Clearly a violation of their due process and equal protection rights.

Amendment XIV

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


Noah Vail
Premium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to expert007
Re: Change

said by expert007 See Profile :

Yeah, I'm not happy about this one (understatement), but I'm looking at the bigger picture.
Translated:I'm not going to make the same stink over it that I would if it were Bush we're talking about.
The severity of the crime depends on who's committing it, after all.

NV
--
In my perfect religion, a giant hole appears and sucks up all the lousy people.
I call it the Crapture.


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
reply to Matt
Things have changed.. some for the better, some for the worse.
Forums » Dozens of AT&T/Verzion Wiretap Suits Dismissedpage: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5


Friday, 04-Dec 21:59:41 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF