 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | Simple Answer Get rid of the USF and there will be no waste. -- Blagojevich / Madoff 2012! |
|
|
|
 Bit00Premium join:2009-02-19 00000 | Gov't and clear goals don't belong in the same sentence Gov't by definition and design = waste. -- POKE 65495,1 |
|
 | Actually, they "belong" in the same sentence... they just never seem to make there together. But, that's politics for you:
govt = politics = waste
Pity we can't get what we're payin' for: actual representation. |
|
 SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA | Such Republican political talking points. Keep in mind that Corporate = profit -> worse than waste because they take as much extras as they can at your expense. |
|
 DataDocMy avatar looks like me, if I was 2D.Premium join:2000-05-14 Greenville, NC 1 edit | It's not about politics, it's about waste. |
|
 | reply to SLD Republican vs. Democrat = two sides of the same coin. Companies are in business to make money... duh. Our representatives are "supposed" to represent our interests--"our" as in "we the people". Of course, if they were ever to do that, I'm sure half the population would faint from the shock. |
|
 mrkevinKnowledge comes, but wisdom lingers.Premium join:2007-08-07 Aurora, ME | reply to SLD you have a choice though: You're not forced to do business with anyone...Except the Gov't.
I can't see why making a profit = evil If I am selling something, I want the highest price I can get for it. Does that make me evil? If I am buying something I want to pay the least amount I can for it. Does that make me evil? |
|
 LinklistPremium join:2002-03-03 Longport, NJ kudos:5 | reply to SLD said by SLD:Such Republican political talking points. Keep in mind that Corporate = profit -> worse than waste because they take as much extras as they can at your expense. (Corporate costs + profits) is still less $ than (gov't inefficiency + no profits). And that is the formula that matters. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
 wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY | reply to SLD said by SLD:Such Republican political talking points. Keep in mind that Corporate = profit -> worse than waste because they take as much extras as they can at your expense. So do you mean to imply that companies should give away their goods/services for free??  -- D-Day; If you can read this thank a soldier -The United States of America-
|
|
 Bit00Premium join:2009-02-19 00000 4 edits | reply to SLD Except corporations earn their money, they don't steal it by Federal mandate just to set it on fire in corrupt waste-filled bullcrap.
Just look at oil, with all the screaming that goes on about Exxon profits, government makes 6X the "profit" off a gallon of gas than Exxon does. Exxon makes about $0.10/gal profit per gallon and when you sell as much product as they do it equates to insane amounts of profit, in the tens of billions of dollars.
BUT, the Federal government excise tax is $0.184/gal plus there is state excise tax, sales tax etc. In California for example, while Exxon makes their hefty $0.10 per gallon, government makes $0.639/gal. »www.californiagasprices.com/Tax_Info.aspx So when evil corporate Exxon makes $10B, the goverment rakes in well over $60B. When evil Exxon makes $40B, the government rakes in well over $240B.
PLUS government gets to tax Exxon on those billions in profit and they tax the crap out of everyone who works at Exxon (in the U.S.)...even more insane government profit off Exxon's efforts. Meanwhile government didn't do a damn thing for it except endlessly vilify them. -- POKE 65495,1 |
|
 | reply to mrkevin It's not that profit is evil. It's the lying that people do to get it, and get more of it, that's evil. It's that whole "money is the root of all evil" thing. Those who seek it go to the places where they can get it. |
|
 SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA | reply to wifi4milez No, I'm just pointing out that when someone claims that Gov't is just plain wasteful, the other option is to hire a company to do the same job. When the Gov't does it, there may be waste, but not necessarily. When a company does it, much more cost will be extracted from the citizens because a profit *must* be earned. And typically, gov't waste is a pittance compared to corporate profits earned on our backs. This is particularly inherent is gov't backed monopolies like communications. |
|
 SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA | reply to Bit00 Uhhh... the cost of gas going from $1.75 to over $4 a gallon was not Gov't profit. That was legalized theft from the corporate sector - the same sector that is getting socialized bailouts. |
|
 SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA | reply to Linklist And your source for this statements comes from??? Hannity? |
|
 SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA | reply to wifi4milez Did I imply that? |
|
 SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA | reply to mod_wastrel Yep. |
|
 Bit00Premium join:2009-02-19 00000 4 edits | reply to SLD Wrong. It was supply and demand. Increased demand from China and India put pressure on a limited resource along with speculators and it was OPEC and other petro-nations that got the biggest money...funding idiots like Hugo Chavez.
Exxon got their money from the pure volume of purchases and government got theirs by theft.
And given that sales tax (8.75% here in Cali) is on the price of the gas, the more expensive the gas got, the more insane profits the government made on it. The California sales tax alone eclipses the profits Exxon makes on the gas in this state.
In fact when prices started to drop, Sacramento pissed and moaned, wanting to raise the excise tax to compensate for the drop in obscene sales tax revenues that they had reaped and quickly wasted. -- POKE 65495,1 |
|
 SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA 1 edit | Oh, sorry, you're right. China and India went out and found their own supply - that's why the price went down. NOT! If you understood how the futures market (and other trading) works, you'd understand that the cost was a result of artificial demand. Why do you think the cost dropped by 50% in 1 month - right around the threats of investigation?
Enron's stock jockies did the same thing in CA. They went down for it. |
|
 wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY | reply to SLD said by SLD:Did I imply that? Yes.
said by SLD:Keep in mind that Corporate = profit -> worse than waste because they take as much extras as they can at your expense. You clearly stated that a company making a profit is worse than government waste, your words not mine.... -- D-Day; If you can read this thank a soldier -The United States of America-
|
|
 SLDPremium join:2002-04-17 San Francisco, CA 1 edit | But I didn't say that companies should give away their goods/services for free? Did I? It is worse for the citizen because they are paying more for the same thing. But companies have a right to earn a profit. If I can get health care as an option from the gov't for less because no profit, I'll appreciate that option. |
|