Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » RIAA: The Majority Agrees With Us
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2009-06-25 12:33:04: Last week a jury found P2P user Jamie Thomas guilty of sharing copyrighted music files, with most reasonable individuals finding the $1.9 million jury-awarded penalty ($80,000 per song) incredibly excessive, and perhaps even unconstitutional. ..

page: 1 · 2
SiliconBandt

join:2008-05-24
Winnipeg, MB

sign of the times

who don't want the content future to be a "wild west":

"...make use of a service that could be dirt cheap if it wasn't run by profitteering gluttons.."
Mr Matt

join:2008-01-29
Eustis, FL
·Comcast
·Embarq

Those who can afford the best lawyers win.

I do not know why Jamie did not get the hint that it would be a good idea to stop allowing access to her music files after receiving notice, or was it simply that she did not know how to block access to the files in question? Is the new rule to allow the RIAA to bill a violator $1.9 Million Dollars for being ignorant of computer technology or just not being very sophisticated? Does this decision mean that if one is accused of music file sharing and their hard drive crashes they are automatically guilty? It has always been my position that these lawsuits could be avoided if the copyright control agencies would be required to give a violator written notice before being allowed to make a demand for payment.

Unfortunately the Copyright Control Agencies have been given unreasonable authority to file lawsuits without proper notice and judicial control. The Copyright Control agencies have always been heavy handed and used legalized extortion to shake down businesses for violating copyright law.

In the case of the Happy birthday to you police the investigator would use deception and phony identification to trick a restaurant staff member into singing "Happy birthday to you" to them and their guests. Soon after the restaurant owner would receive a demand letter for an outrageous fee for violating copyright law.

In the case of the Music on hold police the investigator would call businesses and when they were placed on hold they would listen for music. If the investigator was able to identify copyrighted music the business owner would soon receive a demand letter for an outrageous fee. The pattern is the same. When a business owner received notice to pay a $3,000.00 + Dollars demand to settle the complaint, they would pay the blackmail and write it off as a business expense.

The RIAA is now using the same technique to shake down individuals.

Murdoc

join:2009-02-08
Manitowoc, WI

Wheres the comment button on there blog?

Thought a blog was something that can be commented on.
Why is no there contact email address?
How interesting....
Forums » RIAA: The Majority Agrees With Uspage: 1 · 2


Saturday, 05-Dec 10:36:56 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF