site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
Comments on news posted 2010-03-12 10:16:49: Just a few days before the FCC is poised to introduce our first ever national broadband plan, the agency has launched a new java-based speed test application at the Broadband.gov website. ..

page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7
AuthorAll Replies


Uncle Paul

join:2003-02-04
USA
kudos:1

Boost

Wonder if their test will properly gauge the true speed of Comcast boost services?


Duramax08
Win8 sucks
Premium
join:2008-08-03
San Antonio, TX

A step forward

Now to wait and see what happens with this info.


AMDUSER
Premium
join:2003-05-28
Earth
kudos:1
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·RoadRunner Cable

1 edit

The test is inaccurate...

I tested my cable internet on it, and it said I had about 30 Meg (even though I only have 7 Meg Road Runner, but with Powerboost(tm).

If they want accurate, they are going to have to do something to mitigate the Powerboost to get the rated service speed.


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

Pointless

So now ISPs will simply optimize connections to that site so they can show higher speeds.

Meanwhile, things like unfees continue unabated.
--
"Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service.


Bill Dollar

join:2009-02-20
New York, NY

FCC's Obsession w Web2.0 continues

Wow. /s/ It is so awesome that the FCC has now decided instead of going out and collecting useful information in a scientific manner, and instead of forcing carriers to hand over good data, that they've now decided to crowdsource data collection. Man, if only the Census Bureau would follow their lead, we could ditch the whole program and put up a website instead. /s/

Another tools is great I guess, for those who for some reason are unable to locate any one of the hundreds of other similar tools. But this "data" won't provide much useful information, because it is flawed in numerous ways (i.e. powerboost, wifi interference, multiple users on a single line), and the sample is user self-selected. If the FCC actually tries to make policy based on this lazy data collection method, then they'll end up getting sued under the Data Quality Act.


Shamayim
I already have a Messiah.
Premium
join:2002-09-23

Dot gov?

I smell IP harvest.

KD4CVR

join:2000-09-21
Gainesville, GA

Who is taking notes?

Ok call me paranoid , in the tool the first question is "Where are you accessing the internet? followed by "Current address where you are accessing the internet"??? Who is housing that information?

jus10

join:2009-08-04
Sterling, VA

reply to Shamayim

Re: Dot gov?

Even if they were, to what end? They're just IPs of ISPs in the US. I'm sure if they wanted, they could get that list other ways.

mAlfunkti0n

join:2003-12-16
Loveland, OH

reply to KD4CVR

Re: Who is taking notes?

You are actually worried about this? Do you honestly think it would be difficult for them to gather the information on their own if they REALLY wanted to? They know who I am and where I live, and I am sure quite a bit more than that.

Your tin foil hat is getting larger ...


Z80A
Premium
join:2009-11-23

3 edits

reply to pnh102

Re: Pointless

And inaccurate. This only shows how fast the the connection between their servers and that user, not actually what speeds the ISP is actually supplying them. I have a full T1 which gives me 1386kbps after overhead like clockwork and this test reported 800/900 with 200ms latency (actual local latency is in the teens). So are they going to use that data to claim what the speeds are here? This is like that lame telecom union site that was equally inaccurate by design so that they could claim the need for billions in gov't spending on infrastructure.

This test also doesn't indicate what is AVAILABLE to subscribers, only a weak indicator of what they are CHOOSING to buy. What is available is just as or more important than what people are choosing to buy.

A complete waste of taxpayer dollars. They could get far more complete data by browsing speetest.net's results.


powerspec88
Premium
join:2007-03-11
Lenexa, KS
Reviews:
·SureWest Internet

Its a bit slow..

Tested here at my place of work and its a bit slow. They need to beef up their servers a bit more. Dual fiber lines with a total speed of 750Mbps.


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:33

reply to KD4CVR

Re: Who is taking notes?

The government already knows where you live and what kind of cereal you eat. They don't need to harvest that info via the FCC website.


Z80A
Premium
join:2009-11-23

reply to powerspec88

Re: Its a bit slow..

Inaccurate test by design. Your work obviously needs $10M in porkulus to get those upload speeds up. Time to borrow against the credit of Joe Taxpayer.

MRCUR

join:2007-03-09
Columbia, PA

reply to KD4CVR

Re: Who is taking notes?

They already have that info... So yes, you're just a paranoid person.

mAlfunkti0n

join:2003-12-16
Loveland, OH

reply to powerspec88

Re: Its a bit slow..

I love the JITTER test .. reminds me of old people doing the jitterbug.


OldschoolDSL
Premium
join:2006-02-23
Indian Orchard, MA
Reviews:
·voip.ms
·Comcast

reply to pnh102

Re: Pointless

said by pnh102:

So now ISPs will simply optimize connections to that site so they can show higher speeds.

Meanwhile, things like unfees continue unabated.
I believe it. I ran 4 test on that site and EVERY TIME my speed was as advertised (exactly as advertised).
--
I often find it complexing that people feel that you've reached a level of maturity and responsibility if you can accept being riped off or taken advantage of for someone else's gain or enjoyment

Independent TV


HarleyYac
Yaco
Premium
join:2001-10-13
Allendale, NJ
kudos:2

reply to Uncle Paul

Re: Boost

inaccurate. It states I have a 25/3 when I have 25/15. Also my fios tested on another site is 25/25 which is accurate.
Lee

amungus
Premium
join:2004-11-26
America
Reviews:
·KCH Cable
·AT&T DSL Service

reply to powerspec88

Re: Its a bit slow..

750Mbps
what's your upload speed supposed to be, 750 as well?

Mine was somewhat close @ work (12Mbps fiber), though there is some traffic going in/out right now.

Agree that harvesting speedtest.net results would be a good idea.

NeoandGeo

join:2003-05-10
Harrison, TN

reply to HarleyYac

Re: Boost

Mine said my connection was a 22/1 but I only have a 8/1

RX300

join:2004-02-23
Bluff Dale, TX

FCC Still Defines Broadband As - Faster Than Dialup

I've got DSL and I don't have broadband. It is a 300k connection. Several years ago that was not bad. Now it sux. Forget about streaming anything. Even utube videos have to be paused. It takes over a minute to load the HBO page.
Like the title says, they still think broadband is anything faster than dialup and that's wrong.
I have done many speed tests and never gotten over 300. Tested at the FCC site just now. Guess my connection got 10% faster because they are telling me it is 330k now. WooHoo
This is as good as it gets because my IP says there are no plans to increase the bandwidth. Little Texas town with an independent telco that serves a population of less than 3000. There is no hope for anything faster.

Sunday, 19-May 18:53:37 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.