dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
view:
topics flat nest 
Comments on news posted 2010-04-09 09:10:18: Verizon CEO Iven Seidenberg, who is on his way out as CEO of Verizon, might want to take back an interview he conducted this week, as it has given him nothing but trouble. ..

sparky57
join:2003-05-18
New Bedford, MA

sparky57

Member

Seidenberg leaving Verizon

"Verizon CEO Iven Seidenberg, who is on his way out as CEO of Verizon"

What is your source that he's leaving?
Crookshanks
join:2008-02-04
Binghamton, NY

Crookshanks

Member

have their cake and eat it too....

Of course they want to have their cake and eat it too. Contrary to what most people think, big business actually welcomes regulation to an extent. They know that they can use their legions of lobbyists and political contributions to ensure that regulations get written to protect their existing business model and shut out competitors. It's also easier for a big business to comply with said regulations than it would be for a small upstart that can't afford legions of lawyers.

The fact that Verizon seeks to use the regulatory system to it's advantage should surprise no one. The fact that we let them get away with it should engage anybody who is informed enough to be engaged in the political process.
33358088 (banned)
join:2008-09-23

33358088 (banned)

Member

why not just gut democracy altogether

its not like ceos aren't calling the shots in America. PERHAPS its time to kick out obama and put in the JOE BIDEN for president
and then next up the mpaa chief

yea why not its good for you. YOU NEED THIS PAIN before you realize its a scam ALL OF IT
Crookshanks
join:2008-02-04
Binghamton, NY

1 recommendation

Crookshanks

Member

Minor nitpick, but the United States isn't a Democracy in the classical sense. It's a Constitutional Republic.

A better solution than gutting it would be to take it back -- no where is it written in stone that our choices are limited to those that work for big media (Democrats) and those that work for big industry (Republicans).

Of course the majority of the American people are too busy consuming opiates for the masses to even bother to vote, let alone get outraged by what's going on. As long as American Idol comes on when it's supposed to they won't get outraged enough to involve themselves in our political system. More's the pity.
88615298 (banned)
join:2004-07-28
West Tenness

88615298 (banned) to 33358088

Member

to 33358088
said by 33358088:

its not like ceos aren't calling the shots in America. PERHAPS its time to kick out obama and put in the JOE BIDEN for president
and then next up the mpaa chief

yea why not its good for you. YOU NEED THIS PAIN before you realize its a scam ALL OF IT
How about making Ted Stevens President? He knows the internet isn't a truck.
Luminaris
join:2005-12-01
Waterford, VA

Luminaris

Member

Even though Ted Stevens looks like he was run over by a truck
Crookshanks
join:2008-02-04
Binghamton, NY

Crookshanks to 88615298

Member

to 88615298
said by 88615298:

How about making Ted Stevens President? He knows the internet isn't a truck.
But then Sarah Palin can't run as VP again unless she moves to a different state....

fifty nine
join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

fifty nine

Member

Spectrum

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?

FFH5
Premium Member
join:2002-03-03
Tavistock NJ

FFH5

Premium Member

said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Seidenberg is afraid most of the new wireless spectrum that would be made available won't go to Verizon. That would make more competition to Verizon's dominant position in the US. If Verizon can't get the spectrum, they would prefer it not be made available at all.
88615298 (banned)
join:2004-07-28
West Tenness

88615298 (banned)

Member

said by FFH5:

said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Seidenberg is afraid most of the new wireless spectrum that would be made available won't go to Verizon. That would make more competition to Verizon's dominant position in the US. If Verizon can't get the spectrum, they would prefer it not be made available at all.
Well the spectrum would be auctioned. After spending billions on the 700 Mhz spectrum and billions on FiOS development, investors are probably worried about spending billions more. Which means at&t would likely get much of the new spectrum and Verizon doesn't want that. If the FCC had talked about 2025 or 2030 then Verizon probably be all for it.
88615298

88615298 (banned) to fifty nine

Member

to fifty nine
said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Hell they haven't used ANY of the 700 MHz spectrum they bought 3 years ago.

RARPSL
join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY

RARPSL

Member

said by 88615298:

said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Hell they haven't used ANY of the 700 MHz spectrum they bought 3 years ago.
I agree. There should be a "Use It or Lose It" provision in the Auction Terms. If you do not use the Spectrum (as opposed to warehousing it to keep others from using it) within a designated period of time, it should be confiscated and resold with you being ineligible for bidding for it again and also ineligible for a refund on your purchase.

digiblur
Premium Member
join:2002-06-03
Louisiana

digiblur to 88615298

Premium Member

to 88615298
said by 88615298:
said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Hell they haven't used ANY of the 700 MHz spectrum they bought 3 years ago.
And they are sitting on tons of other spectrum. If you're in Verizon's world then correct there is no crunch on spectrum due to the licenses they have.

tim_k
Buttons, Bows, Beamer, Shadow, Kasey
Premium Member
join:2002-02-02
Stewartstown, PA

tim_k to RARPSL

Premium Member

to RARPSL
said by RARPSL:
said by 88615298:
said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Hell they haven't used ANY of the 700 MHz spectrum they bought 3 years ago.
I agree. There should be a "Use It or Lose It" provision in the Auction Terms.
To be fair, Verizon is going to use it for their LTE network, but it's taking time to get it out there.

RARPSL
join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY

RARPSL

Member

said by tim_k:

To be fair, Verizon is going to use it for their LTE network, but it's taking time to get it out there.
IOW: They are warehousing it (as I stated) and claiming they they will eventually use it [with no firm "will be in use by date"] - Meanwhile not CURRENTLY using it or allowing anyone who would/could use it NOW from being able/allowed to use it. They have been sitting on it for 3 years and have done NOTHING with it except to prevent it from being used.

FFH5
Premium Member
join:2002-03-03
Tavistock NJ

FFH5

Premium Member

said by RARPSL:

said by tim_k:

To be fair, Verizon is going to use it for their LTE network, but it's taking time to get it out there.
IOW: They are warehousing it (as I stated) and claiming they they will eventually use it [with no firm "will be in use by date"] - Meanwhile not CURRENTLY using it or allowing anyone who would/could use it NOW from being able/allowed to use it. They have been sitting on it for 3 years and have done NOTHING with it except to prevent it from being used.
And what is a REASONABLE period of time to put an asset you paid BILLIONS for in to use? I think the FCC says 10 yrs. You say what?

Gbcue
Premium Member
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA

Gbcue

Premium Member

500MHz

I'm sure T-Mobile will gladly take 500MHz of spectrum!
Big Dawg 23
join:2002-03-27
Northfield, MN

Big Dawg 23 to 88615298

Member

to 88615298

Re: Spectrum

Keep in mind until June 2009 many electronics were still operating. Then they still had an additional delay before they could begin testing LTE on the 700MHZ. According to what VZW continues to say they are still on course for 30 LTE markets in 2010.
mdrift
join:2003-08-15
Spokane, WA

mdrift to FFH5

Member

to FFH5
said by FFH5:

said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Seidenberg is afraid most of the new wireless spectrum that would be made available won't go to Verizon. That would make more competition to Verizon's dominant position in the US. If Verizon can't get the spectrum, they would prefer it not be made available at all.
True, but considering the US Government owns the spectrum he has nothing to say about it, other than, ``I see your $15 Billion and raise you to $20 Billion!''