baineschile2600 ways to live Premium Member join:2008-05-10 Sterling Heights, MI
1 recommendation |
Yay!We can comment again.
I dont really have anything too insightful to say except; dont steal on the internet, as it will eventually be tracked by certain corporations. |
|
|
YAY! ... I "Do" have something to add... Yay! |
|
|
yay_Comments
Anon
2012-May-14 8:54 am
i'm too am glad commenting is back. |
|
FFH5 Premium Member join:2002-03-03 Tavistock NJ |
FFH5
Premium Member
2012-May-14 8:49 am
Verizon doesn't care about book thievesBut I bet if the BitTorrent users were copying TV shows or movies on Verizon's pay-per-view offering list they would play along. A small book publisher just doesn't merit Verizon's interest and is an annoyance they don't want to encourage from other small fry. |
|
Duramax08To The Moon Premium Member join:2008-08-03 San Antonio, TX |
to cableties
Re: Yay!I also have something to say.
About damn time!!!!!! |
|
|
to FFH5
Re: Verizon doesn't care about book thievesEven if they were copying the Pay Per View line up, it does not make business sense to dump someone paying you $100+ because you lost a few dollars.
Like in this case, Verizon would be getting paid $45 per customer, and then might end up lossing the money they get monthly from that account. |
|
dudeman456 |
to yay_Comments
Re: Yay!Yeah, I just noticed that. Its great! |
|
thegeek Premium Member join:2008-02-21 right here |
to baineschile
I don't steal on the internet. But I pirate. They are different.
/troll |
|
1 edit |
it's coming to an endThese lawsuits are coming to and end. » digitaljournal.com/artic ··· e/324465Once defense lawyers start using this, it's game over. |
|
|
to thegeek
Re: Yay!said by thegeek:I don't steal on the internet. But I pirate. They are different.
/troll Hypothetical Question BluRay title "The Grey" at BB for on sale for $12.99 The same film on Xbox Live is 1480 pts (Roughly $17) But on torrent, its free. I felt LIVE is now a rip off. Should I buy the disc (only to watch it once) or get the torrent (4GB file, might take 3 hours to d/l with several seeds)? Now,I saw The Grey in theater... I enjoyed it but not enough to warrant purchase to own. But I did miss the extended ending (longer with better explanation not in theatrical). What do I do? Will Verizon turn me in if I d/l the torrent, watch the ending and then delete? |
|
tkdslr join:2004-04-24 Pompano Beach, FL |
tkdslr
Member
2012-May-14 9:53 am
ID'ing e=book bit torrent users on Cell networks,is really difficult to get right.
All the cell phone network data is flowing through a distributed network of NAT's, thus thousands of users all appear to be using the same IP address.
A bit torrent for an e-book(A couple of mega bytes) wouldn't take very long. A couple of seconds on a LTE network.
Thus there would be a good chance of identifying the wrong party, who in turn could counter sue and name Verizon for negligence. |
|
88615298 (banned) join:2004-07-28 West Tenness
1 recommendation |
to dudeman456
Re: Verizon doesn't care about book thievessaid by dudeman456:Even if they were copying the Pay Per View line up, it does not make business sense to dump someone paying you $100+ because you lost a few dollars.
Like in this case, Verizon would be getting paid $45 per customer, and then might end up lossing the money they get monthly from that account. but if you don't do something them you encourage everyone to do it. |
|
|
thegeek Premium Member join:2008-02-21 right here |
to cableties
Re: Yay!Well if you're smart about the way you pirate (i.e. don't use bittorrent and if you must don't use pirate bay) then you likely won't get caught.
Thanks for the reminder about The Grey BTW. I missed it in the theater and want to see it. |
|
slimtim join:2002-12-12 Cleveland, TN |
to habskilla
Re: it's coming to an endTPTB next step is a special chip implanted in your fingers integrated with computer keyboard..so they know who's at the computer at the time of the crime. Hmmm.. Minority Report here we come... |
|
TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus join:2001-06-20 Cheyenne, WY |
to tkdslr
Re: ID'ing e=book bit torrent users on Cell networks,There are so many free ebooks to be had from Amazon, Google Books, Baen, etc, etc, etc. why pirate. of course this is all a part of the big stink going with iBooks, and the usual we want more money crowd. |
|
RARPSL join:1999-12-08 Suffern, NY |
to cableties
Re: Yay!said by cableties:said by thegeek:I don't steal on the internet. But I pirate. They are different.
/troll Hypothetical Question BluRay title "The Grey" at BB for on sale for $12.99 The same film on Xbox Live is 1480 pts (Roughly $17) But on torrent, its free. I felt LIVE is now a rip off. Should I buy the disc (only to watch it once) or get the torrent (4GB file, might take 3 hours to d/l with several seeds)? Now,I saw The Grey in theater... I enjoyed it but not enough to warrant purchase to own. But I did miss the extended ending (longer with better explanation not in theatrical). What do I do? Will Verizon turn me in if I d/l the torrent, watch the ending and then delete? Check if your local library system has a copy for loan. Also if you have a Blockbuster or NetFlix rent-by-mail account, rent it there. |
|
|
to thegeek
wrong. Bittorrent is safe in a few dark corners of the net ...using trackers you haven't heard of. Oh yes ..they do exist ... just not on your radar |
|
25139889 (banned) join:2011-10-25 Toledo, OH |
to dudeman456
Re: Verizon doesn't care about book thievesVZ would not hurt over a few dollars a month. For ever customer that leaves they gain more in its place. |
|
KearnstdSpace Elf Premium Member join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ |
to FFH5
or it could be that Verizon simply sees it as better PR to fight the court order than blindly comply and let some other company pick through their subscriber records.
IMO every ISP should resist. if the big ones actually resisted and demanded hard evidence than there would be less media owner lawyers picking through people's records.
The Entire "war on piracy" has been bullshit from the start, it has not done a thing and has cost consumers and taxpayers money for nothing. |
|
N3OGHYo Soy Col. "Bat" Guano Premium Member join:2003-11-11 Philly burbs |
to cableties
Re: Yay!How about go rent it for like 2 bucks??? |
|
N3OGH |
to baineschile
Glad to see commenting back as well.
Karl should do a brief blurb outlining what happened to the site, the history of the data loss & recovery & open it to comments.
Kind of a meet & greet the first day back from a long hiatus.
I'm sure this Friday's open thread (first one in like, what a MONTH?) will be interesting.
Kinda like seeing who's drunk & posting on Facebook on a Saturday night! |
|
|
joako Premium Member join:2000-09-07 /dev/null |
joako
Premium Member
2012-May-14 4:24 pm
Give them a cutI am sure Verizon would reverse their position if they got say a 20% cut of the settlements. |
|
iknow Premium Member join:2012-03-25 |
to 88615298
Re: Verizon doesn't care about book thievessaid by 88615298:said by dudeman456:Even if they were copying the Pay Per View line up, it does not make business sense to dump someone paying you $100+ because you lost a few dollars.
Like in this case, Verizon would be getting paid $45 per customer, and then might end up lossing the money they get monthly from that account. but if you don't do something them you encourage everyone to do it. they should NOT try to identify an infringer by IP address!!. first, many times they get the wrong IP address, and second, the IP address don't identify a person!. it could be someone that hacked in to your wireless, and then you could spend thousands of dollars on a lawyer trying to fight this, it HAS happened before!. they need to take a picture of the person using that account at the time the infringing takes place!. THEN something like this is valid. |
|
|
Zehd
Anon
2012-May-15 3:09 am
CAN they even identify them??This might be more complicated than you realize; one reason verizon may be trying to block this might be because they CANNOT identify the identities--if the IP's in question are the IP addresses of their cache servers for all their 3g customers. Even though they only requested the identities of 10 ip addresses, it's quite conceivable that all 10 are cache servers serving thousands of users each.
If it IS the cache servers in question, verizon would have to be provided with accurate timestamps, PLUS the source and target IP address and source and target port numbers. Only with all of that would they be able to--if they still have it logged (the log may auto-delete after 30 days or so--only reason they keep it even that long would be to assist law enforcement---because that would be a LOT of data to keep track of.) They basically have to keep a log of the every tcp stream (they might or might not log udp sessions) on their cache server (original source IP, cache server iP, original port number, target port number, cache server port number, timestamp).... and then they would have to cross reference the internal IP address to the PPP dial-up logs to identify the phone. |
|