|
castsucks
Anon
2012-Aug-16 9:32 am
best case and Worse caseBest case and Worse case
Best for uses it's a cable card or all vid box that you can buy.
Worse case rent only (usa) for $15-$20 /mo each or canada $20-$25 rent / rent to own or buy for $600-$800. | |
|
Cheese Premium Member join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL |
Cheese
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 9:34 am
Yawn.....Yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn | |
|
skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 |
skeechan
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 9:35 am
Going to be next to impossibleMSOs aren't going to give up their $20/mo cash hog which is their digital box + DVR service.
But if they could get a DBS provider to bite like DirecTV it could end up like an iPhone...people may switch providers to get the device if it doesn't suck and as a result, MSOs would have to come get it just like Verizon and Sprint did for iPhones. And with DBS being nearly universally available, every MSO COULD feel the pressure to offer the device.
Of course there will be haters that matter what, declare any device of this sort DOA just as they did the iPhone and iPad. | |
|
| mogamer join:2011-04-20 Royal Oak, MI
1 recommendation |
Re: Going to be next to impossiblesaid by skeechan:MSOs aren't going to give up their $20/mo cash hog which is their digital box + DVR service.
I guess you've never heard of cable card devices then. Even though Comcast is the biggest cabelco, you could get their complete service without renting any of their equipment (outside of a cable card). Xbox 360 for On Demand service, Tivo or HTPC as a dvr, and use your own modem for internet and phone. | |
|
| | skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 |
skeechan
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 9:48 am
Re: Going to be next to impossibleThey support cablecards because the FCC forced them to.MSOs were dragged kicking and screaming to cablecards. | |
|
| | | FFH5 Premium Member join:2002-03-03 Tavistock NJ |
FFH5
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 9:50 am
Re: Going to be next to impossiblesaid by skeechan:They support cablecards because the FCC forced them to.
MSOs were dragged kicking and screaming to cablecards. So what! That support is there and could be used by Apple. | |
|
| | | | skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 4 edits |
skeechan
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 9:52 am
Re: Going to be next to impossibleUh, obviously that isn't what they're doing. They don't need to negotiate with MSOs to make a cablecard device. If Apple makes a cablecard device, FCC mandates that the MSOs permit it. MSOs wouldn't have a choice just like they don't have a choice with TiVo. The only reason to negotiate with MSOs is to STREAM their content like the previously mentioned XBOX+Comcast stuff or the Cox+iPad stuff. It looks to me that they want Apple TV with functionality resembling the Cox iPad app except it actually work after updating But the MSO has to permit such functionality just as Cox is the one putting the iPad app up. My guess is there is a new Apple TV in the works that runs apps from an Apple TV app store and they want to offer (embedded) apps resembling the Cox iPad app in addition to games and everything else. Such a device, if still in the $99 range I reckon would be immensely popular. Apple TV would then supplant the Wii as the budget game console, especially since the Wii-U goes upscale. | |
|
| MoracCat god join:2001-08-30 Riverside, NJ |
to skeechan
said by skeechan:MSOs aren't going to give up their $20/mo cash hog which is their digital box + DVR service. MSO's have already gotten this figured out by swapping fees around. For example Comcast lowered the rental fee for the boxes down to $3 and now charges a $17 outlet fee. That fee applies to customer owned devices as well so even if a user brings his own box, he pays almost as much as he would if he rented a box. | |
|
| | skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 |
skeechan
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 5:26 pm
Re: Going to be next to impossibleHuh, I didn't know that. I thought outlet fees were illegal now, like with the telcos. You only pay for the connection to the J-box and then you can split it as much as you want fee-free. | |
|
| | | MoracCat god join:2001-08-30 Riverside, NJ |
Morac
Member
2012-Aug-16 5:32 pm
Re: Going to be next to impossiblesaid by skeechan:Huh, I didn't know that. I thought outlet fees were illegal now, like with the telcos. You only pay for the connection to the J-box and then you can split it as much as you want fee-free. You can split the signal as much as you want, but since all the signals are now digital and encrypted (at least with Comcast) that won't do you much. Basically with digital cable the MSOs know exactly how many "digital outlets" (i.e. MSO and user provided boxes) you have. | |
|
| | | | skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 |
skeechan
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 8:50 pm
Re: Going to be next to impossibleWow, that is crazy. So even with a TiVo you would get hit $17+$2-$3 cablecard rental per box? If Cox ever did that I'd be gone that day. I have 6 "outlets". | |
|
| | | | |
to Morac
I put together a Windows Media Center PC with a Ceton quad tuner card that uses CableCard. Then I put a cheap XBox anywhere else I want tv. Whole home DVR. Comcast gives you the first CableCard for free and they credit my account $2.50 per month for owning my own equipment.
Yes, it cost a fortune to build the box. But I have an awesome entertainment center and a whole home DVR. No monthly fees for equipment or TV listings. | |
|
| | | | | |
Re: Going to be next to impossibleThis is a great way to go, I use to work for a great custom home theater company in Minnesota that did that. We also would put a RAID array inside for backup and a great program called anydvd do the HTPC was a jukebox of your DVD/blueray collection. Our owner was extremely knowledgeable in PCs we were the only one in the Metro that offered them at the time.
Another cool thing he came up with was to split the VGA signal and run it to a white 7" install LCD monitor sold by Accelle electronics of californa it had VGA in and usb touch screen overlay inside. A pair of USB over cat 5 converters got the signal back to the HTPC. You could have this in your master bed room and run everything on the PC. It looked soo cool. And I think the screens were only 250 wholesale. | |
|
| |
to skeechan
There is very little utility and margin to proprietary boxes. The IP is in the software and moving to IP and centralized DVR. This way the costs will come down dramatically from a capital perspective and an operating perspective.
Once they move to IP, there is no reason say they put the DVR functionality in the CMTS and nobody needs to have a DVR, just IP devices and say tablets and the like.
DVR's are capital intensive, and TBH useless considering the entire body of shows could easily be streamed from a CDN or neighborhood POP.
In any case all of my verizon boxes had cablecards in them, so CC is widely used. I simply removed the fee and setup W7MC which does all of the IP things they are dreaming of.
And the real competitor to Apple in this space is Microsoft and maybe Samsung. STB are dying, it's all about the software. | |
|
FFH5 Premium Member join:2002-03-03 Tavistock NJ 1 edit
1 recommendation |
FFH5
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 9:48 am
Apple can build one now - a cable card ready deviceJust like TIVO did, Apple can build a STB right now that can work on cable systems. It would accept cablecards and would ALSO have their AppleTV box functions for Internet access built-in too.
The problem is that Apple, as usual, wants to build a box where Apple controls the whole process of updates, apps, access, etc. Thereby trying to ace out the carrier from dealing with the customer at all. | |
|
| skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 |
skeechan
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 10:07 am
Re: Apple can build one now - a cable card ready deviceThat would the price up the box and make deployment troublesome for end users. Anyone with a TiVo (I have two) can attest to the nightmare cablecards are.
It is much simpler for Apple to simply app up a new 4th generation Apple TV with MSO supported apps for which MSOs get in-app subscription revenues for.
I just don't see Apple making a "real" cable box. Apple TV is inches away from running everything in the app store and if they can get TV on there, they'd sell a zillion. | |
|
| | NOCTech75 Premium Member join:2009-06-29 Marietta, GA |
Re: Apple can build one now - a cable card ready devicesaid by skeechan:That would the price up the box Yes because Apple products are soooooo cheap. | |
|
| | | skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 |
skeechan
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 2:10 pm
Re: Apple can build one now - a cable card ready deviceSome are, some aren't...depends on the market segment. | |
|
| |
to FFH5
How is this any different than a Tivo? If I buy a Tivo, the only interaction I should be having with the cable company is to get a Cablecard and paying the monthly service fee, right?
I have no illusions that Apple's motives are not altruistic nor anything but in Apple's best interests; but anyone who can disrupt this nonsense of having to rent gear from the cable company in order to watch the service for which I'm paying, is alright in my book. | |
|
|
softwareComcast/timewarner/and cablevision all have software that you can use on an ipad or ip[hone to watch tv.
Apple does not have to do an new setup .Just have those 3 put the software on the apple tv. No new setop required.
Cablevision showed their software running on a samsung and lg tv so why not? | |
|
| skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 |
skeechan
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 10:09 am
Re: softwareThere is no Apple TV developer agreement other than those very specific ones (eg Netflix, Hulu, etc). Apps running on iPad wouldn't automatically be supported by a 4th gen Apple TV. The developers for the MSO would have to do that.
And if Apple tries to support it themselves, MSO simply pull the apps from the App Store.
Apple has no real choice but to negotiate with MSOs if they want to deploy a 4th gen Apple TV with apps, games AND cable TV. | |
|
29393955 (banned)Always the green wire join:2011-09-11 Mount Juliet, TN |
29393955 (banned)
Member
2012-Aug-16 10:16 am
STB? - Who CaresWhy does anyone have any interest in STB's? The reality is, just like landline phones, cable TV is a 'dead service walking'... They just haven't admitted it yet. The new generation doesn't care about Radio, Cable TV, or anything wired - it has to be mobile AND internet based to even interest them (look at the latest facts on where the kids get their music from). My teenage daughter hasn't sat down in front of the TV in ages. She gets everything she wants on her phone - YouTube, Netflix, Hulu, DI.fm, etc. She only opens her laptop to play games! This time Apple is too late to the show. Between the cord-cutters and the mobile generation, the cable-cos become ISPs or die - it really is just that simple. Why do you think the telcos are simply abandoning copper and focusing on wireless? Any cable-co that's not putting every resource into data is a future bankruptcy... | |
|
| SpaethCoDigital Plumber MVM join:2001-04-21 Minneapolis, MN |
Re: STB? - Who Caressaid by 29393955:Why does anyone have any interest in STB's? The reality is, just like landline phones, cable TV is a 'dead service walking'... They just haven't admitted it yet. ... just like these graphs clearly show the decline of HDTVs in households.. er.. wait.
| |
|
| | pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty Premium Member join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD |
pnh102
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 12:30 pm
Re: STB? - Who CaresNon sequitur. Don't forget that HDTVs have been the only thing you could buy for quite some time now. It only stands to reason that more households would have them and that their penetration would increase over time, if only because people are replacing older tvs with new ones.
I'm more interested in the total number of pay tv subscribers over time. Methinks it has been flat, as the only way one provider can get new customers is to poach them from another provider. Based on previous reports here, I don't see people who cut the cord completely on pay tv as a huge factor, yet.
Assuming the number of total subscribers is flat and has been over time, then I would say the pay tv industry might want to start worrying. | |
|
| | | SpaethCoDigital Plumber MVM join:2001-04-21 Minneapolis, MN |
Re: STB? - Who Caressaid by pnh102:I'm more interested in the total number of pay tv subscribers over time. Methinks it has been flat, as the only way one provider can get new customers is to poach them from another provider. The rate of growth is slowing, but it's definitely not flat.
| |
|
| | | | pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty Premium Member join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD |
pnh102
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 1:12 pm
Re: STB? - Who CaresI can see how non-US markets being crucial for US-based content providers... but it seems the US market itself is rather flat. » news.investors.com/artic ··· loss.htmPay TV service, at least in the US, has nowhere to go but down. | |
|
| | | | | SpaethCoDigital Plumber MVM join:2001-04-21 Minneapolis, MN 1 edit |
Re: STB? - Who Caressaid by pnh102:I can see how non-US markets being crucial for US-based content providers... but it seems the US market itself is rather flat.
»news.investors.com/artic ··· loss.htm
Pay TV service, at least in the US, has nowhere to go but down. Q2 numbers have been the worst in the cycle for the last few years. See:
Also, 2012 Q1 posted a 494,000 net subscriber increase before the 348,000 loss in Q2 -- so it's still net positive on the year.
Source: »paidcontent.org/2012/05/ ··· d-in-q1/It's only been relatively flat the last couple years, and that's largely a reflection of the economy. Still, when you have 100 million subscribers in the US paying for TV, it's pretty easy to see why you'd want to make a device that would appeal to some of them. Note that the major area of growth is TelcoTV, and Verizon is still using QAM delivery for TV, hence a "cable box" would be usable for them as well. | |
|
| | | | | | pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty Premium Member join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD |
pnh102
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 7:01 pm
Re: STB? - Who CaresI'm certainly not disputing that the current market for pay TV in the US is huge, it definitely is. I am just not seeing it as a growing industry as it used to be say, 10 or 20 years ago.
But given the price increases and the continuing problems with the economy, I just don't see these numbers increasing as a whole. | |
|
| | | | | ncbill Premium Member join:2007-01-23 Winston Salem, NC |
to pnh102
I still pay for TV, but oly per-episode for the 'cable' shows I want, commercial-free, via Amazon Video.
Broadcast channels all recorded over-the-air via a TivoHD. | |
|
| | jjeffeoryjjeffeory join:2002-12-04 Bloomington, IN |
to SpaethCo
What does HDTV have to do with cable tv? | |
|
| | | SpaethCoDigital Plumber MVM join:2001-04-21 Minneapolis, MN |
Re: STB? - Who Caressaid by jjeffeory:What does HDTV have to do with cable tv? Remember how most people weren't willing to switch to AT&T for wireless service before they got the iPhone? The right device can make the most inferior service somehow become palatable. | |
|
|
What about IP based Tv?If they could secure the rights to the programming and manage to "unbundle" it, allowing you to stream the channels to the box via your broadband connection, then THAT in my opinion is compelling enough to compete. It would be contingent on 2 things in my opinion, first being I dont want to wait until the next day for the programming (live programming should be an option). Second, the pricing would have to reflect the unbundling of the channels if they go that route. Alot of people that I know are sick of paying for 200 channels and watching 4 to 10 of them. It certainly would make an interesting products. | |
|
| skeechanAi Otsukaholic Premium Member join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 |
skeechan
Premium Member
2012-Aug-16 8:54 pm
Re: What about IP based Tv?With a lot of major MSOs capping HSI usage and looking at overage fees they have their bases covered...which of course is the real reason for caps+overages...not any capacity crunch. | |
|
tpkatl join:2009-11-16 Dacula, GA |
tpkatl
Member
2012-Aug-16 11:00 am
What good is an Apple box when Comcast controls the pipe?We're all at the mercy of our cable provider and their caps and what they're willing ot throw down the pipe. We all know how Comcast really feels about Net neutrality - and it's not encouraging.
As long as {comcast, Charter, TWC} controls the coaxial cable, then Apple doesn't have a prayer.
Which is why Google's Kansas City experiment is MUCH more promising than any Apple box. | |
|
elray join:2000-12-16 Santa Monica, CA |
elray
Member
2012-Aug-16 12:23 pm
How many times?Karl laments that broadcasters "are terrified of the existing cash cow being disrupted". I doubt any Wall Street analysts would characterize the broadcast industry as drowning in cashflow.
Apple is the stubborn one here. They are unwilling to invest in the last-mile network and assure 2K/4K delivery; they are unwilling to pay for the content. | |
|
| |
Re: How many times?Apple makes more money from music than the record labels do.
Apple makes more money from cell phones than the carriers do.
Apple makes more money from e-books than the publishers do.
At this point, anyone approached by Apple for a partnership is going to be very wary about handing Apple all the cards. | |
|
| | pnjunctionTeksavvy Extreme Premium Member join:2008-01-24 Toronto, ON |
Re: How many times?This is what I'm thinking. They'd be morons to let Apple into their business unless they're itching to fork over a large chunk of their revenue. The business as a whole isn't growing, if Apple is going to step in and make more money than the current STB manufacturers that bigger slice is going to come from somewhere. | |
|
Metatron2008You're it Premium Member join:2008-09-02 united state |
Do the set top boxes look like Apples?Oh uh! Watch out cable stb companies, Apple is gonna buy up some patents! | |
|
| ••••• |
|
sarcasm coming..sure, $49 set-top rental fee...!
Afterall, consumers love cable-tv they're unsubscribing in droves.. most likely, consumers will use the free content model.. since they're now officially gonna get gouged for internet next year.... since the last of the competitive ISPs refuse to compete now.. | |
|
IowaCowboyLost in the Supermarket Premium Member join:2010-10-16 Springfield, MA |
They should just build on the Apple TVThey should just build an Apple TV with a CableCard slot. That way consumers would not have to be dependent of their Cableco having it on their system. | |
|
dvd536as Mr. Pink as they come Premium Member join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ |
dvd536
Premium Member
2012-Aug-17 11:15 am
Apple tvDon't they max out at 720P?
thanks but no thanks. | |
|
|
|