site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
Comments on news posted 2012-11-15 12:20:35: AT&T's recently announced DSL expansion may not be all it was cracked up to be after closer examination. AT&T announced in a press release on November 7 that they'd be expanding their U-Verse coverage total from 24. ..

page: 1 · 2 · 3
AuthorAll Replies


DataRiker
Premium
join:2002-05-19
00000

3 edits

Festering Toilet.

Did anybody expect anything honest from this crap filled commode?

Uverse is essentially a scam from the ground up. From its promise of advanced fiber optic television and internet , which delivers absolutely horrendous video quality, to its billing practices, and its treatment of workers.

Att hopes your either

A: stupid enough to believe the hype
B: unfortunate to have no choice

What trash.


lordfly

join:2000-10-12
Homestead, FL
Reviews:
·SkyNet360

AT&T doesn't care

My neighborhood is not in the upgrade period. Our DSL is substandard and if they even wanted to give anyone service in my area of a few houses, they would have to bond the entire pole.

I am waiting for them to just take the lines off the poles and recycle them. They would be more profitable.

elefante72

join:2010-12-03
East Amherst, NY
Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·Verizon FiOS
·voip.ms

I said this weeks ago

Think about it:

Suburbs - New builds. Organic growth. Put the refrigerators in and UTP. Maybe fibre. Check.
Exurbs - Maybe fill out some areas where existing franchises are with new refrigerators. Take a look at data on population trends and build some new refrigerators.
Rural - Are you kidding me. Uverse technology wasn't built for that, and you have aged copper plants. Hybrid is only reasonable over coax. Now wouldn't that be funny if they went to coax

Just with new starts and filling out exurbs they should be good for a few million homes.

There are only two long term options in rural areas: Fiber or wireless, or a combo. Can you say whitespace.

MyDogHsFleas
Premium
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX
kudos:5

reply to DataRiker

Re: Festering Toilet.

Have you looked at U-verse TV lately? I think it's gotten better since I dumped it some 18 months ago (maybe 2 years). I saw it at someone's house the other day, it didn't look half bad even with fast action sports in HD.


gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall

join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA

Status quo

They sent a Motorola NV510 which doesnt have a bridge mode and seems to be unstable.

Seems intentional they disable basic features that every other modem Ive ever seen has.

The service is still distance limited so no faster speeds here, unless we choose another internet service, like Comcast or Cruzio.
Still a dam dinosaur. UUoogha buooogha.
--
Let them eat FIBER!

osravens

join:2011-01-26
Cumberland, MD

In other news.....

....AT&T is being AT&T.

Gilitar

join:2012-02-01

FTTC

What about those that have FTTC in the old BellSouth territory. It wouldn't take much to upgrade us. Would they really cut us too?


mikedz4

join:2003-04-14
Weirton, WV

what about eastern ohio

Does this leave the people in eastern ohio without u-verse.

Skipig

join:2011-11-22
Parker, CO

Just seize them

Why doesn't the administration just seize them (and all the other network providers as well)? Give Internet connectivity and television away free. What use do they serve? The governement can run the network, control the content (especially Fox), employ a whole bunch more people (because we wouldn't have to worry about efficiency), eliminate the profit motive and take Wall Street out of the equation.


hyphenated

@bellsouth.net

What?!

.....Who forgot got the popcorn!?!

Gilitar

join:2012-02-01
Reviews:
·AT&T Southeast

reply to Skipig

Re: Just seize them

said by Skipig:

Why doesn't the administration just seize them (and all the other network providers as well)? Give Internet connectivity and television away free. What use do they serve? The governement can run the network, control the content (especially Fox), employ a whole bunch more people (because we wouldn't have to worry about efficiency), eliminate the profit motive and take Wall Street out of the equation.

Sounds like a great plan to me. Let's start a petition on the white house website. We could call it Obama Connect. LOL

I'm kidding of course!


hyphenated

@mycingular.net

Sad

Yeh it's kind a sad but still not as good as prime time.


battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000

reply to Skipig

Re: Just seize them

Oh and you can name the new network stalin.net?


battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000

Intended side effect of this...

I am sure an intended side effect to this is that AT&T (Verizon is following to) is using this move to eliminate any of the remaining ISPs that buy DSL aggregation from AT&T.

A now retired AT&T executive told me about a 1-2 years ago that AT&T believes that if they were to find a way to end the existing contracts that 99% of those users would just switch to AT&T even if they had access to other services like Cable and Muni Fiber.
--
I do not, have not, and will not work for AT&T/Comcast/Verizon/Charter or similar sized company.


JigglyWiggly

join:2009-07-12
Pleasanton, CA

u verse is a downgrade since your ping rises substantially compared to adsl2+


EngineerDave

join:2001-08-27
Birmingham, AL

reply to lordfly

Re: AT&T doesn't care

What do you mean by "bond the entire pole?"


delusion ftl

@comcast.net

reply to Skipig

Re: Just seize them

This MUST be a joke. I cannot fathom this comment being anything more than a piece of sarcasm.

If it is not then the intelligence of the electorate is doomed.

delltechkid

join:2004-11-09
Hermitage, TN

reply to MyDogHsFleas

Re: Festering Toilet.

I have it. It's still the same crappy HD. But it's cheap when you're in the promo period!

delltechkid

join:2004-11-09
Hermitage, TN

reply to Skipig

Re: Just seize them

You only think this is funny because where you live you have more than one option for internet. In rural areas, what AT&T is planning to do is terrible. Let's hope a private provider can step in without AT&T suing or helping to regulate them out of business.

AT&T hates regulations, unless it's state laws that prevent competition.

rradina

join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO

reply to EngineerDave

Re: AT&T doesn't care

Guessing here but I interpret it as meaning they would have to bond every pair on the pole to get enough throughput to support U-Verse. It's an exaggeration to support his opinion on the plant quality in his area but unless I'm way off, I think it makes sense.

Monday, 20-May 21:40:54 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.