dslreports logo
site
spacer

spacer
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


view:
topics flat nest 
Comments on news posted 2013-01-15 17:30:14: [user=Thane_Bitter] writes in to note that Rogers has not only acquired one of Shaw's cable subsidiaries, but will also be acquiring Shaw's Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) licenses as part of a massive, $700 million deal. ..


bklass
Premium
join:2012-02-06
Canada
kudos:2

Competition?

Just another example of cable companies in Canada "competing" with each other.

Rogers and Shaw already stay out of each other's territory, splitting Canada East/West for wireline services.

dan mackay

join:2008-10-11
Barrie, ON
so, how long till source is bought out by cogeco or robbers :P


andyb
Premium
join:2003-05-29
SW Ontario
kudos:1
You mean "The Source" the old radio shack? Bell owns that

Beans5

join:2005-07-16
united state

Rogers

Isn't Rogers AT&T, but in Canada?

yyzlhr

join:2012-09-03
Scarborough, ON
kudos:4
said by Beans5:

Isn't Rogers AT&T, but in Canada?

No, AT&T used to own a portion of wireless operations in Canada, but Rogers acquired whatever AT&T had up here.


Dustyn
Premium
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN
kudos:11

1 edit

Robbers



Guspaz
Guspaz
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC
kudos:23
reply to yyzlhr

Re: Rogers

From a historical standpoint, AT&T once held a minority stake in what is now Rogers Wireless, hence why it had been known at various points as "Cantel AT&T", "Rogers Cantel AT&T", and "Rogers AT&T Wireless". There is no longer any such connection.

From a functional (and also historical) standpoint, Bell Canada would be the closest equivalent to AT&T in Canada, especially since Bell Canada was once considered to be part of the Bell System as a Regional Operating Company. It was only a partial ownership (peaked at 49% in 1885), but both AT&T and Bell Canada spawned from Alexander Graham Bell's original telephone patents (the US and Canadian versions of the patents respectively).
--
Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc »fixppp.org


GrandPaFD

@shawcable.net

Great news....

can now watch my internet bill increase in cost!

dan mackay

join:2008-10-11
Barrie, ON
reply to andyb

Re: Competition?

said by andyb:

You mean "The Source" the old radio shack? Bell owns that

Source Cable, think about it, this is about the shaw area in hamilton thats being talked about right :P

MaynardKrebs
Heave Steve, for the good of the country
Premium
join:2009-06-17
kudos:4
reply to GrandPaFD

Re: Great news....

said by GrandPaFD :

can now watch my internet bill increase in cost!

Yes. But don't watch it too closely or you'll quickly go over your monthly 'cap'.


Simba7
I Void Warranties

join:2003-03-24
Billings, MT
reply to Beans5

Re: Rogers

said by Beans5:

Isn't Rogers AT&T, but in Canada?

I always thought it was Bell.


LazMan
Premium
join:2003-03-26
canada
reply to dan mackay

Re: Competition?

You mean Rogers or Rogers... Don't forget Roger's owns about a 40% stake in Cogeco.


RARPSL

join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY

Why are they being allowed to keep the licenses?

"It should be noted that Rogers was barred from participating in the auction for that wireless band because Industry Canada felt they already had too much of an advantage in the market".

Given this ban, why are they not being required to divest themself of the Shaw licenses as part of the approval of the deal. It looks like Industry Canada is falling down on the job here or has been paid off to look the other way.


MJB

join:2012-01-29
Reviews:
·VMedia
·ACN DSL
They should be stopped before they purchase all the independent isp's. Switch and stop their profits from rising. No subscribers, no chance of takeover of certain companies (tech - isp). Speed increase is useless without data cap increase. Like getting a fast car and driving on a 2 kilometer length freeway. Enough is enough.

yyzlhr

join:2012-09-03
Scarborough, ON
kudos:4
reply to RARPSL
said by RARPSL:

Given this ban, why are they not being required to divest themself of the Shaw licenses as part of the approval of the deal. It looks like Industry Canada is falling down on the job here or has been paid off to look the other way.

The deal hasn't gone through yet. It is still subject to approval from the competition bureau, crtc and industry canada which isn't likely to happen until next year.


MJB

join:2012-01-29
Reviews:
·VMedia
·ACN DSL
reply to RARPSL
They should be stopped before they purchase all the independent isp's. Switch and stop their profits from rising. No subscribers, no chance of takeover of certain companies (tech - isp). Speed increase is useless without data cap increase. Like getting a fast car and driving on a 2 kilometer length freeway. Enough is enough.

kevinds
Premium
join:2003-05-01
Calgary, AB
kudos:3
If customers are switching to a competing independent ISP, and they loose enough customers, they'll buy the indepenent...
--
Yes, I am not employed and looking for IT work. Have passport, will travel.


StopRobbers

@shawcable.net

Deal not good for us

This deal should not be allowed to happen.

bisk

join:2002-06-15
Binbrook, ON

Please don't let this happen!

Shaw has greatly improved the old Mountain Cable service. Their prices and available plans are light years better than anything that Rogers offers.

simon726

join:2006-12-21
Ajax, ON

Cogeco should have acquired Mountain Cablevision...

Cogeco should have bought Mountain Cablevision - at the first place! That way, it'll keep Shaw out of the backyard!