dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
view:
topics flat nest 
Comments on news posted 2013-02-01 16:35:24: Speaking about their earnings this week, Time Warner Cable announced that the company will be doubling their existing Wi-Fi footprint this year, with a heavy emphasis on their New York City markets. ..

en103
join:2011-05-02

en103

Member

Lots of spots in SoCal

In LA - they have a LOT of Wifi - probably more coverage than most ever would use, and keeps many from requiring a cell plan on a tablet.
onthecake
join:2003-08-08
Kansas City, MO

onthecake

Member

Meh

So far I have not been that impressed with the ones in KC. They connect about 1/3 of the time and when they do the speeds are only good enough to lightly browse on a tablet.
swarto112
Premium Member
join:2004-02-17
El Dorado Hills, CA

1 recommendation

swarto112

Premium Member

who cares?

how about upgrading that infrastructure?
JackBauer
join:2006-08-24
Schenectady, NY

1 recommendation

JackBauer

Member

Maybe that's what they are doing.

Building a mesh network to bypass their lame hybrid coax fiber network.

juilinsandar
Texas Gooner
Premium Member
join:2000-07-17
San Benito, TX

juilinsandar

Premium Member

at&t has a better wifi coverage in my area

Sadly, the only twc wifi areas are in the local twc offices.

antdude
Matrix Ant
Premium Member
join:2001-03-25
US

antdude

Premium Member

Put near my locations!

So I can use if mine goes down. :P
en103
join:2011-05-02

en103 to JackBauer

Member

to JackBauer

Re: who cares?

probably more likely to push a deal to many 'urban dwellers' (NYC) where they wouldn't want to pay the extra $20-$30/month for limited data over cellular.

Maybe their long term is to partner with a cellular provider (aren't they hitching up with VZW?). It'd give AT&T a run for their money, and reduce the cost of overages, and give them some clickstream cash.
TBBroadband
join:2012-10-26
Fremont, OH

TBBroadband to antdude

Member

to antdude

Re: Put near my locations!

This most likely wouldn't help you. Especially if they're putting the APs on the cable lines along the street.

antdude
Matrix Ant
Premium Member
join:2001-03-25
US

antdude

Premium Member

said by TBBroadband:

This most likely wouldn't help you. Especially if they're putting the APs on the cable lines along the street.

Yeah, if it is a big outage. Sometimes, I do have small ones.
elray
join:2000-12-16
Santa Monica, CA

elray to swarto112

Member

to swarto112

Re: who cares?

said by swarto112:

how about upgrading that infrastructure?

Here in Socal, TWC is the only entity that does, all the while prices have come down or remain flat.

We've on our third upgrade of the cable plant in a decade.
elray

elray to en103

Member

to en103

Re: Lots of spots in SoCal

Indeed, there is a lot of coverage near commercial boulevards.
But connectivity and signal quality varies widely.

With a good connection, 15/1 is common.

djrobx
Premium Member
join:2000-05-31
Reno, NV

1 recommendation

djrobx to en103

Premium Member

to en103
said by en103:

In LA - they have a LOT of Wifi - probably more coverage than most ever would use, and keeps many from requiring a cell plan on a tablet.

Really? Of all the times I've checked for wifi availability, I've only seen TWC wifi show up once. I stumble across AT&T much more frequently (usually due to a Starbucks).

I'm not sure what the point of investing in wifi is. TWC would be much wiser to spend their efforts on their cable system. Their LA HD lineup is still a total joke and they're still running Comcast's iGuide software from 2004.
funny0
join:2010-12-22

funny0

Member

corrected title

"Time warner cable to double SPYSPOTS in 2013"