meanwhile, the gigabit spawns across the nation… Meanwhile, and apart from Google's own 1000/1000 @ 70$/mo in Kansas City:
* 50/50 @ $35/month in Utah (not a promo, not a bundle; yes, an internet only option!)
* 100/100 @ $45/mo in Utah / Utopia (not a promo, no bundling required!)
* 1000/100 @ $70 from Sonic.net in Sebastopol, CA (reg price, coming to SF soon)
* 250/250 @ $140 in Chattanooga, TN
* 1000/1000 @ $140 from Paxio.net in some parts of Bay Area.
Although Verizon's 150/65 @ 100$ is pretty sweet deal, too, if you ask me. (-:
I maintain a no-thrills list on newsworthy providers at »bmap.su/, if anyone's interested.
El Paso, TX
Re: History repeats itself.
said by skeechan:That's a fallacious argument.
That would be relevant if Gates ever said it or if Verizon said 50Mb is all anyone would need.
What Gates said was true at the time and what Verizon is saying is true now.
It doesn't matter if he said it or not. Because it doesn't make the premise any less true.
The bottom line is broadband speed has not kept up with other information technologies. At least not for the "last mile" users of these connections.
There's not a damn thing we can do about it for now, but this will inevitably change.
The progress itself hasn't slowed down one bit, all we have in our hands is what right now appears to be an un-addressable engineering challenge. While this might be the case right now, it won't be the case in just a decade or less. Pretty soon we'll look at cable companies the same way we look at DSL companies right now. (like a sick dog that needs to be put down) The fact is this is already the case; but for now all we can do is wait.
El Paso, TX
Re: Demand will drive faster speeds Really? long way off?
I just want to know what kind of thinking i'm dealing with here...
Do you believe the HDTV standard will last as long as the SDTV one did?