 | Aereo Aereo doesn't have to pay broadcasters carriage fees, and Dish does. A partnership with Dish could save Dish a lot of money and bring in a lot of money for Aereo. Sound like a win win.
I am not convinced Aereo will not implode however. |
|
 TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus join:2001-06-20 Cheyenne, WY Reviews:
·CenturyLink
| What a howler Talk about beimg hoisted on their own petard. The judge asked the Broadcasters how is the coin sized Aereo device any different from a regular antenna. When they explained the Judge say OK if the Aeroe device is illegal then a regular TV antenna is too....Good by.  -- I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man's reasoning powers are not above the monkey's. - Mark Twain in Eruption |
|
|
|
 | reply to silbaco
Re: Aereo Roku has the same idea basically. Become an MVNO and move on. Dish is currently providing the international channels to Roku and they have stated before (last year many times) that an MVNO is possible. |
|
 Reviews:
·Mediacom
·RoadRunner Cable
| The court decision has not happened, contrary to this story Karl's story says:
quote: a court again declared the company's $12 a month broadband streaming service does not violate copyright.
That is not what happened. The appeals court, by a 2-1 margin, declined to reverse the lower court's refusal to issue a preliminary injunction shutting down Aereo. The courts have yet to declare whether Aereo violates copyrights or not. |
|
 NickDPremium join:2000-11-17 Princeton Junction, NJ Reviews:
·Comcast
| Aereo In the meanwhile, Aereo can build up a critical mass of users, and if they are deemed to be illegal, they can get the rights to broadcast local channels from Dish. If it's deemed legal, Dish can end the contracts to rebroadcast locals, and bundle Aereo with the service. They could also incorporate the Aereo receiver into the satellite receiver so that people can seamlessly switch between satellite and locals. I'm sure eventually, Dish would like to stream their entire channel library online to offer "satellite" TV to those who cannot receive it, and Aereo has the technology for that. Dish has the leverage of being able to negotiate online streaming rights because of the sheer number of customers it has. Within a decade, bandwidth and reliability will increase to the point that it'll be possible for 5 people in a house to stream an HD channel and there would be plenty of bandwidth left over. |
|
 | Re: Aereo/speaking of dish there was an new york times article dish bought up 600,000 million in lightsquard debt meaning they own more than half i wonder what they have in mind wanting to become a cell mvno or pick up where lightsquard left off im sure they dish could obtain the fcc waiver that lightsquard wasent able to obtain.hmn |
|
 rebus9 join:2002-03-26 Tampa Bay | How is it legal? I have no love for cable companies or broadcasters, but I'd love to know the legal foundation which permits re-broadcasting copyrighted content (by any method, over the air or via network) without permission. |
|
 TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus join:2001-06-20 Cheyenne, WY | According to Leo LaPort at TWiT it has something to do with the rulings on Slingbox. |
|
 rradina join:2000-08-08 Chesterfield, MO | reply to silbaco
Re: Aereo How does it save Dish money? Aereo's legal standing is based upon connecting each user to a tuner and separate antenna in their facilities. How would Dish leverage this to provide OTA to their subscribers through the satellite? Unless the Dish customer also signs up for satellite broadband and Dish has the bandwidth to stream Aereo's OTA channels to the consumer, I don't see how Dish could partner with Aereo and stop paying carriage fees. |
|
 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
| Dish wouldn't really save money on carriage fees- unless Aereo PAID Dish to be an MVNO. Which would reduce the amount Dish pays directly since they can split the cost with Aereo.
But what this could do is give Dish the power and network to stream without spending much money since Aereo already has that. They can just peer their networks together over Fiber. |
|
 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
| reply to themaninda
Re: Aereo/speaking of dish Dish was/is working on their own LTE network that has been said countless times on here and on other news sites. They have the money they just need to put it to use; but i don't see them selling phone service- more like running their own TV and Internet services over it. Would be stupid of them to try to focus on phone and play with that when TV is their primary business and they do a great job at it. |
|
 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
| reply to Transmaster
Re: How is it legal? Actually they are not rebroadcasting the service. What Aereo is doing- is what Slingbox does but takes it a step farther. It's basically co-locating your antenna and using Sling to shoot it across the Internet. Each person has their own antenna and DVR space; they pay for their own antennas, etc. If they were rebroadcasting- they would have ONE antenna split among everyone but they don't, which is how the Slingbox rulings could come in to play. |
|
 | reply to rradina
Re: Aereo some of the dish boxes can have antenna tuners added to them so maybe if a sub has a working antenna and then they say for that sub they do not have to pay the broadcasters carriage fees. |
|
 openbox9Premium join:2004-01-26 japan kudos:2 | reply to TBusiness
Re: How is it legal? How is the content not retransmitted when/if the bit rate is changed? The content is received, stored, altered, and then transmitted, regardless of how many receivers exist. |
|
 | reply to Joe12345678
Re: Aereo the antenna tuner on the box isn't going to improve anything. Aereo isn't giving you antennas to put at your home. they're streaming you your OTA service on the Internet. You already put your antenna at their data bank. |
|
 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
| reply to openbox9
Re: How is it legal? By the way Aereo and Slingbox are set up- you already paid for the content- so you already have the rights to stream it to yourself. As long as you don't charge for it- it wouldn't be retransmitting.
Retransmitting- would be as a MSO, IPTV provider or D* provider. |
|
 | reply to themaninda
Re: Aereo/speaking of dish 600,000 multiplied by $1,000,000 = $600,000,000,000 = $ 600 Billion dollars. Does Lightsquared really have $1.2 Trillion dollars in debt? |
|
 openbox9Premium join:2004-01-26 japan kudos:2 | reply to TBusiness
Re: How is it legal? said by TBusiness:As long as you don't charge for it- it wouldn't be retransmitting. So, the $12/mth fee? |
|