dslreports logo
site
spacer

spacer
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


view:
topics flat nest 
Comments on news posted 2014-04-10 09:18:20: Currently only available in a small portion of Austin at speeds of 300 Mbps, AT&T has recently hinted that their "1 Gbps Gigapower" U-Verse upgrade will soon be coming to portions of Dallas and San Antonio. ..

page: 1 · 2 · next


gatorkram
Need for Speed
Premium
join:2002-07-22
Winterville, NC
kudos:3

Sigh

No one wants to come east of I-95 it seems.


battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000

Now wait a minute!

EPB says you can download a Full length HD movie in just 12 seconds (but they can't tell you from what site) with their 1Gb service and AT&T says it's 36 seconds with their 1Gb. I think someone is full of crap.

Come to think of it I think they both are.
--
I do not, have not, and will not work for AT&T/Comcast/Verizon/Charter or similar sized company.


Simba7
I Void Warranties

join:2003-03-24
Billings, MT

at&t at it again

In Austin, AT&T offers 1 Gbps lines for $70 if you agree to be monitored by AT&T's deep packet inspection technology and have all of your surfing and online activities monitored. The cost is $100 a month if you refuse.

So, you're getting penalized $30 if you don't want to be spied on.. when in reality you're spied on anyway? Nice way of providing a false sense of security while beefing up your profits.

As part of their participation in the NCNGN, AT&T says they'll provide public Wi-Fi and free U-Verse to "up to" 100 public locations and 100 business buildings. They'll also be offering free 3 Mbps service to 10 affordable housing complexes.

..of their choosing and whenever they feel like it. They'll probably institute caps and put the link on the lowest priority in their network.

Like other AT&T Gigapower announcements the company doesn't offer an estimate of how many everyday residential customers will actually be able to get the faster 1 Gbps speeds when the dust settles. AT&T has repeatedly told investors the upgrades won't really hit AT&T's bottom line hard if at all, which continues to suggest less broad deployment and more marketing theater designed to counter the PR hit taken by initiatives like Google Fiber (read: offer next-gen speeds to just enough users to appear competitive and adaptive).

Precisely. They've pulled this crap before, promising things and never actually doing a damn thing. I guess no one learns from the past and we get screwed over in the process.
--
Bresnan 30M/5M | CenturyLink 5M/896K
MyWS[Core i7-870@2.93G,16G RAM,GTX780,3x1TB WD Blacks,Win7]
MyLaptop[Asus G53SX,32GB RAM,2x2TB HDD,Win7]
WifeWS[C2D@2.4G,4G RAM,250G HDD,Win7]
Router[PE1750,4G RAM,3x36G HDD,2xIntel Pro/1000+GT Quad Port,Gentoo]

elefante72

join:2010-12-03
East Amherst, NY
reply to battleop

Re: Now wait a minute!

Dont confuse marketing bs. You can only download at the speed of the slowest point in the chain. If the network is not the bottleneck, then the sender is or the receiver. Even on my 50/25 line, I can rarely max that out on any download, hence why I don't bother getting anything higher.

elefante72

join:2010-12-03
East Amherst, NY
reply to Simba7

Re: at&t at it again

Well the answer to spying is running a VPN tunnel. Not exactly rocket science. Any sensitive stuff I run through a SOCKS proxy on the web and I have a VPN VM for anything else I don't want people to know about.

In Canada Rogers was doing DPI by default along with traffic shaping, so I am SURE AT&T is already doing this in the US and tapping that data to the Three Letter Agencies. Check your cell, DPI.

We are so naive in this country.

And I may be crazy but all this free stuff communities require to get franchises is total bs, because that cost (in addition to the franchise taxes) just gets passed on to the people who actually work for a living. If they want to wire a building, pay for it. Government buildings don't have a right to internet just because they are the royals. They don't rake in enough $$$ from franchise fees to pay for such things?

If you look at where these guys are putting fiber, it's essentially areas where competition IS, not where it is not. So wastefully you have cities with two sets of fiber, and large swaths of the US sucking bits through a straw. This doesn't move the needle for the country, it simply creates a larger divide for the rest of us.


Mizzat
Will post for thumbs
Premium
join:2003-05-03
Atlanta, GA
kudos:1

2 recommendations

reply to Simba7
said by Simba7:

In Austin, AT&T offers 1 Gbps lines for $70 if you agree to be monitored by AT&T's deep packet inspection technology and have all of your surfing and online activities monitored. The cost is $100 a month if you refuse.

So, you're getting penalized $30 if you don't want to be spied on.. when in reality you're spied on anyway? Nice way of providing a false sense of security while beefing up your profits.

Google does the same thing, so does Facebook, offer free or discounted products in exchange for privacy. Not sure why this is so nefarious when AT&T does it, you're the one giving up your privacy. They simply will make money off it by offering other products and you're the one that provides the data they use, so they are providing you a discount for the privilege.

As part of their participation in the NCNGN, AT&T says they'll provide public Wi-Fi and free U-Verse to "up to" 100 public locations and 100 business buildings. They'll also be offering free 3 Mbps service to 10 affordable housing complexes.

..of their choosing and whenever they feel like it. They'll probably institute caps and put the link on the lowest priority in their network.

Now you're just making things up, doubtful priority will be any different, that'd be more work than it's worth. Of course they will cherry pick. As a business, why would you provide service for free to places it'd be the most expensive to provide? I don't like it, but I understand it. I'm a victim of it as well, I don't have U-verse in my neighborhood, but the more prestigious neighborhood across the street has been fully deployed.

Like other AT&T Gigapower announcements the company doesn't offer an estimate of how many everyday residential customers will actually be able to get the faster 1 Gbps speeds when the dust settles. AT&T has repeatedly told investors the upgrades won't really hit AT&T's bottom line hard if at all, which continues to suggest less broad deployment and more marketing theater designed to counter the PR hit taken by initiatives like Google Fiber (read: offer next-gen speeds to just enough users to appear competitive and adaptive).

Precisely. They've pulled this crap before, promising things and never actually doing a damn thing. I guess no one learns from the past and we get screwed over in the process.

They delivered 300 Mbps. It's marketing and posturing, tons of businesses do it, and when you're public you have to protect your shares. I agree, though. It seems like better marketing would be to drum up feign interest like Google does and have your cherry picking veiled by the users doing most of the work. "Hey we might bring this service to you if you really want it enough, make sure to write your legislature for us!" It's all bull****, just different flavors and Google has convinced the public that they are doing this in your best interest, but only if you beg them enough. It's genius!

n4bkn

join:2003-12-11
Memphis, TN
reply to battleop

Re: Now wait a minute!

said by battleop:

EPB says you can download a Full length HD movie in just 12 seconds (but they can't tell you from what site) with their 1Gb service and AT&T says it's 36 seconds with their 1Gb.

Perhaps AT&T meant to say 36 seconds with their "available now" 300 Mbps? The 1 Gbps is a future speed.

decifal

join:2007-03-10
Bon Aqua, TN
kudos:1

great

great, just freaking great.. Once again now they get close to my area with Uverse deployments, and now they will once again go back into the G.D city and start this soo called improvement all over again... I just wish to hell they would sell my remote terminal to a coop or smaller company and let the rest of us catch up with the world.


Ark

join:2002-06-08
Ada, MI

So you can reach your data cap in 20 minutes!

What a great way to sucker people into overage charges!

»www.google.com/webhp#q=150GB+%2F+1Gbps


tehkr

@distributel.net
reply to Mizzat

Re: at&t at it again

said by Mizzat:

Google does the same thing, so does Facebook, offer free or discounted products in exchange for privacy. Not sure why this is so nefarious when AT&T does it, you're the one giving up your privacy. They simply will make money off it by offering other products and you're the one that provides the data they use, so they are providing you a discount for the privilege.

Yes google and many other companies do this BUT this is usually really clear and actually provides you added value, another big point is that YOU CAN CHOOSE what you share with google or hell even if you don't want to use their service but for isp's you only have one other choice which makes your point kind of moot

mpellegrini

join:2009-02-22
Tacoma, WA
reply to elefante72
Right on!

existenz

join:2014-02-12
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Google Fiber
reply to tehkr
Well and can they really deliver 300/1Gbps to every user as Google does. Someone else said in another thread that ATT is doing 2.5GPON shared with entire hood. Google is supposedtly doing some kind of WDM-PON/Active Ethernet that allows nearly everyone in fiberhood to hit near a Gbit.

Apologies for posting this often but here's my review of Google Fiber in KC. It really does deliver nearly a full Gbit despite nearly 150 units in my building and many other hirises in my fiberhood with Gfiber already delivered.

»Google Fiber Kansas City

political_i

join:2013-11-12
Reviews:
·Comcast
·Charter
reply to Ark

Re: So you can reach your data cap in 20 minutes!

DSL is limited to 150 GB cap, 250 GB for U-Verse for regular tiers.

300 megs supposedly is a 1 tb cap. »forums.att.com/t5/Account-Billin···/true#M1

ke4pym
Premium
join:2004-07-24
Charlotte, NC
reply to gatorkram

Re: Sigh

Your best bet is going to be RST Fiber out of Shelby, NC.


Mizzat
Will post for thumbs
Premium
join:2003-05-03
Atlanta, GA
kudos:1
reply to tehkr

Re: at&t at it again

I'm not convinced that Google or FB make it that clear they sell your data either. It's simply more known since that is their main business model, where AT&T is just now ramping that model up, but traditionally not their primary money maker.

existenz

join:2014-02-12
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Google Fiber
reply to n4bkn

Re: Now wait a minute!

said by n4bkn:

said by battleop:

EPB says you can download a Full length HD movie in just 12 seconds (but they can't tell you from what site) with their 1Gb service and AT&T says it's 36 seconds with their 1Gb.

Perhaps AT&T meant to say 36 seconds with their "available now" 300 Mbps? The 1 Gbps is a future speed.

And the future Gbit might end up 2.5Gb shared with entire hood. Google has high capacity backend design to give everyone in fiberhood a Gbit.


popwarner

@cstel.com

minimal strategy

Looks like At&t is going to only counter Google to the exact extent of Google's build out, or at least that's what it seems like so far. It gets them good press by doing the minimum necessary to compete. Other major ISPs are likely to, at most, follow in At&t's footsteps.

At this rate, Google will actually need to build out to the rest of the country before we actually see real change to infrastructure... Who knows when/if that will happen. Hopefully some critical mass will be reached and other ISP efforts will build into a self sustaining race to improve infrastructure... But I wouldn't want to bet on it.


fg8578

join:2009-04-26
Salem, OR

1 edit
reply to Simba7

Re: at&t at it again

said by Simba7:

They've pulled this crap before, promising things and never actually doing a damn thing. I guess no one learns from the past and we get screwed over in the process.

The difference is this will be a contract, with specific terms and conditions. The "promises" were never documented in a legally enforceable contract. If AT&T fails to deliver, there s/b terms in the contract for their failure to perform.

[edit: add quote]

TBBroadband

join:2012-10-26
Fremont, OH
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
reply to existenz

Re: Now wait a minute!

And is still at the mercy of the rest of the Internet. So still if the download you're getting is only coming from T1 or T3 you are still only going to get that speed. So having the Gbit is pointless as you're only going to see it on a rare occasion.

TBBroadband

join:2012-10-26
Fremont, OH
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
reply to existenz

Re: at&t at it again

Google only promises that speed on THEIR network as any other ISP. Just because you signed up for 1gig service does NOT mean you will get that once your traffic hits the internet outside of the Google World. You should do a speedtest here on DSLR and I bet you won't get that speed that you're always posting about now

TBBroadband

join:2012-10-26
Fremont, OH
reply to political_i

Re: So you can reach your data cap in 20 minutes!

the 250 on U-Verse is not enforced


battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000
reply to TBBroadband

Re: Now wait a minute!

DING! DING! DING! We have a winner!!!

Chuck tell him what he's won....

existenz

join:2014-02-12
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Google Fiber

1 edit
Not sure where you get your information. I can pull over 800M outside Google Fiber with one computer and near a Gbit with 2 computers. And there are likely hundreds of people in my fiberhood that are active.

See the second post....
»Google Fiber Kansas City

Edit: Here are some KC/Chicago tests at this time...





F100

join:2013-01-15
Durham, NC
reply to ke4pym

Re: Sigh

Right ke4pym. Funny thing is that Durham isn't serviced by AT&T. Verizon was actually the local carrier back when they were promising FIOS to everybody but sold the Durham city market to Frontier a few years ago when they unloaded a bunch of markets. Not sure if that is the whole county or just the city but most of the county is the city now.

So I don't know how they can say the Triangle when you are missing one of three sides. Guess they missed that Geography lesson. At&T talks in circles anyways.

Maybe that will at least encourage Google to move into this market to show AT&T how much better to do it. We'll have to see. So far, RST fiber is the closest I've seen to real network deployment (wired or wireless) and not just talk.


F100

join:2013-01-15
Durham, NC
reply to TBBroadband

Re: at&t at it again

Right but what if you have two real good networks. Universities have 10gig links to the internet, internet2 and NLR. So if someone on Google Fiber connects to desktop PC that has gigabit to the core, then only the internet back-haul could be the slowest link. Wouldn't imagine back-haul limited to less than a gig. Yes it depends on internet traffic but I'd like to see existenz or someone with google fiber test to »ndt.ncren.net/ and post the results.

TBBroadband

join:2012-10-26
Fremont, OH
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
reply to existenz

Re: Now wait a minute!

Still not what you pay for, but it is okay since it's by Google right? Now try the Speed Test from DSLR and see what you get. Also show the actual links from Ookla so we can see if they were Photoshopped.

And you must not have obtained your information from someone that knows that their internet service is only as fast as the slowest point. Aka- a t1 is SLOWER than your GF. Would you like to do a speedtest to my connection at my home? You won't pull what you just posted.

TBBroadband

join:2012-10-26
Fremont, OH
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
reply to F100

Re: at&t at it again

But you still depend on those who are you obtaining your source from. That's the part that most don't understand when it comes to any Internet service. You can have a full 2gigs of Internet available, you're downloading from 155meg connection- you are NOT going to get your 2gig of speed. It's not possible.

And not ALL universities have 10gig links nor do they work with INet2 and NLR they use their own local networks and who they contract.

existenz

join:2014-02-12
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Google Fiber
reply to F100
I've tried your test site multiple times and it wildly varies from 200-500Mbps. It won't let me copy the results in java window.

Here's another test I just did from KC to Chicago, outside KC GFiber network...



In the real world, you can be doing a DropBox download or sync at 200Mbps, recording 8 DVR channels and 5 other people in household doing various things that stress the network and not impact each other. Obviously torrenting is the only hard hitting app at this time (I've hit 500Mbps doing a Linux ISO). Would be hard to hit a Gbit in a household regularly but with other Gbit ISPs you may share 2.5GB with entire neighborhood and could more likely interfere with each other than the way Google backbone is apparently designed.

cramer
Premium
join:2007-04-10
Raleigh, NC
kudos:9
reply to F100

Re: Sigh

It was the entire GTE footprint. They did actually run a huge amount of fiber. However, Frontier are too stupid to use it.

AT&T is just blowing more smoke. NCNGN is a powerless, meaningless bunch of blowhards. NCNGN isn't building anything, doesn't own anything, and has no means to get anyone to do anything at all. "Participation" is just BS ink on more BS paper. AT&T's "gigabit" network has yet to materialize anywhere.

cramer
Premium
join:2007-04-10
Raleigh, NC
kudos:9
reply to existenz

Re: Now wait a minute!

And just how do expect to get greater than 100mbps out of a 100mbps connection? (read: MINE.) You are ultimately at the mercy of the speed of the machine sending you data. In the case of my web servers, that's 10 (ten) Mbps -- intentionally to limit their throughput.

(BTW, the link is gig, but the ISP hardware at both ends limits it to 100. While I can remove the traffic shaping on my side, I cannot on their's.)