Comments | DSLReports.com, ISP Information

Topic	Replies/uniqs	Last Post
All of you are missing one important point by youngmoore	-/42	30th Apr 2002
Why bother? (: 1 2 e) by g0nepostal	20/389	swattsup : 29th Apr 2002
what is nat by badaple	1/40	XPDRAGON : 11th Feb 2002
Misleading title by Authority	11/210	Authority : 4th Feb 2002
Privacy issues by Philmatic	6/84	finortis : 3rd Feb 2002
Users say no to AT&T by TheGiant	15/219	finortis : 3rd Feb 2002
so what? we got router... by heya0	-/49	3rd Feb 2002
Blah blah by meee	3/65	Blizzard0 : 2nd Feb 2002
AT&T should merge with AOL by spamd	2/72	g0nepostal : 2nd Feb 2002
Too bad you guys can't get cox.net by Majiir	-/35	1st Feb 2002
Didnt the cable companies try this already with tv by Spatch	-/43	31st Jan 2002
Didn't AT&T lose this battle 20 years ago? by richb01803	1/52	dbarc : 31st Jan 2002
Now tell me this by Bill Bradsky	6/119	Mick18 : 31st Jan 2002
Monopolies by HDT0	-/30	31st Jan 2002
AT&T and NAT by No_Strings	1/33	Kefka : 30th Jan 2002
bottom line - AT&T Broadband is dying by willardk	3/83	ehoffman : 30th Jan 2002
I can just as easily abuse the sevice with 1 comp by Coder6	-/41	30th Jan 2002
OTOH by nekote	-/45	30th Jan 2002
Here is a better idea by scragg2	-/37	30th Jan 2002
No NAT?!?! by kenyg	-/38	30th Jan 2002
A bit unclear what they mean .. is this optional? by Dewi	2/67	ksw_92 : 30th Jan 2002
Bad business idea by tschmidt	1/47	dnoyeB : 30th Jan 2002
How would this play in court by XBL2009	-/40	30th Jan 2002
So now AT&T has an excuse.....rotflmao by deltat2000	-/30	30th Jan 2002
Good technical support? by ki1o	3/73	pierce2 : 30th Jan 2002
First... by gomer1701ems	-/32	30th Jan 2002
Sucks for AT&T, many users will be pisssed. by Philmatic	-/38	30th Jan 2002

AT&T does not like NAT