site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
Comments on news posted 2000-05-31 22:58:14: Latency Part II, continued from Part I. ..


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:30
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

Re: Ping pong

Yes sir. This is something I was complaining about a month ago when I got my Covad 608 RADSL service. Everyone called me MAD! MAD! Ye said something must be wrong with my PC! Heathen.

With this Covad RADSL setup, I have yet to see a ping under 65 under PRISTINE conditions.

I be thinkin they might wanna be changing their ways.
Anon

Re: Ping pong

123 packets transmitted, 123 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 51.103/58.268/67.066/4.894 ms

on my covad adsl 1.5/384 line

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:30

Re: Ping pong

Supposedly other providers RADSL doesn't suffer the same hit and can obtain pings of 20-30ms. What is Covad doing that is making this RADSL, for lack of a better term, suck?

Jerm

join:2000-04-10
Richland, WA
kudos:2

Re: Ping pong

Complaining about 20ms? Hello, THATS LOW!

I'm stuck with crappy GTE interleave values that cause me 25ms minimum latency!

I had ADSL, and it was more, RADSL lowered it!

Its the stupid Orckit modems :P

BTW I see the lowest in game pings of around 50ms, but most servers are min 80ms

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:30

Re: Ping pong

No no, you misread. Some people can get 20-30ms with RADSL. Covad RADSL lines see a minimum of 65ms. I usually get 75ms standard.
efernandez

join:2000-04-27
Union City, NJ
finally!! i hope this issue gets addressed now that it is in the limelight.

i'm getting ping times over 70ms with the 608 RADSL service.

Saturday, 26-May 08:43:54 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.