republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Giving Valenti a Podium
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2002-09-23 10:45:14: A journalist for the Mercury News, after being critical of MPAA head Jack Valenti, has decided to let Valenti air his side of the copyright debate in his most recent column. ..

page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


garagerock
Premium
join:2002-06-14
Louisville, KY

I'll tell ya what makes me happy...

Get the hell out of the way of technological change.

Go bury your dinosaur heads in the sand and let the free market decide how content is delivered, instead of legislating, dictating, and otherwise scaring the pants off of people trying to protect your cash cows.
--
You're the criminal that never breaks the law.


stickfigure

join:2002-06-11
El Cajon, CA

 Bunch of crap....

seems to me he's really saying "...We just want to make people happy... as long as they don't really want their fair use rights and as long as we still make money, plus we don't really want to change anything that we do, we'll have the technology change to meet our standards and congress change the laws to meet what we think is fair for you (the consumer)."

frickin idiot...


phxmark
What Country Are We Living In?

join:2000-12-27
Glendale, AZ
In other words, a BIG GIANT SCREW up the consumers ARSE!!
--
Where am I?


n2jtx

join:2001-01-13
Glen Head, NY
  Yes indeed -

BOHICA


Count Hogula$
Notorious Dog
Premium
join:2002-06-19
Corona, CA

The MPAA has more of a beef

Unlink music CD's movies on DVD are IMHO worth the money. People are just impatient. If DVD's were released sooner I imagine that movie piracy would be lessened. Face it, when you can get virutally any movie at deepdiscountdvd or another retailer for under $18 including freight...that's a reasonable price point and one that's hard to beat.

Don't wait 12 months to release the movie on video when it's been long dead at the box office.
--
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. -Thomas Jefferson

wjwallace3

join:2002-01-17
Mount Tabor, NJ

reply to garagerock
Re: I'll tell ya what makes me happy...

I don't know why people feel that it is fair to trade movies and music for free, and then get pissed off when someone tells them to stop.

Would you shoplift a DVD from the store? Probably not, but its the same thing. When the studio or record company loses money, the artists suffer.

I agree that the gov't should not change the laws to protect the industry, but they should change laws to protect copyrights in general.

And no, I don't work for a studio or record company.


stickfigure

join:2002-06-11
El Cajon, CA

reply to Count Hogula$
Re: The MPAA has more of a beef

Have to agree with you on this. Funny thing is, most of the people I know that download a movie buy it on DVD cause they want all the extra stuff that comes on the disc.

said by count hogula:
Don't wait 12 months to release the movie on video when it's been long dead at the box office.

think thats a good point. a lot of people will download it just because it's not in a video store or available for purchase


raz58
NSFW
Premium
join:1999-08-15
Tucson, AZ
·Comcast

reply to wjwallace3
Re: I'll tell ya what makes me happy...

said by wjwallace3 See Profile:
When the studio or record company loses money, the artists suffer
Read this, »www.janisian.com/article-interne···cle.html

Then tell us who screws the artists.
--
"A Computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any other human invention in history..with the possible exception of handguns and tequila". Mitch Ratcliffe


kilingspam

join:2001-04-30
San Jose, CA

I REFUSE TO PAY FOR IT AGAIN!

I spent thousands of dollars on records, then did it again to have them on cd's.
THEY HELL if I am going to pay to have them in another format AGAIN!

I spent thousands of dollars on videotapes, then did it again on DVD's.
THE HELL if I am going to pay to have them in another format AGAIN!

Once I have a copy of what I ALREADY PAID FOR DIGITALLY, I will put it in ANY DAMN FORMAT I CHOOSE!

I REFUSE TO PAY FOR IT AGAIN!

I WILL GIVE IT ALL UP BEFORE I DO THAT!


garagerock
Premium
join:2002-06-14
Louisville, KY

reply to wjwallace3
Re: I'll tell ya what makes me happy...

said by wjwallace3 See Profile:
I don't know why people feel that it is fair to trade movies and music for free, and then get pissed off when someone tells them to stop.

I don't know why you care about what I do with my personal property.

I'm all for fairly compensating artists, and the studios, for that matter. My point is that they need to embrace technology and a new business model instead of forcing us, the consumers, the very people that give them their existence, into not having choices about formats, copying to new formats, fair use, etc.

They would rather us be enslaved to their outdated philosophy than to change. Paid subscription model-it works. Just ask any porn site that charges for access.

Going to the record store and buying another tripe filled CD with one or two good tracks for $20 isn't going to work for them much longer. They need to evolve, and perhaps "piracy" is the swift kick in the balls they need/deserve.
--
You're the criminal that never breaks the law.


Pirate515
Premium
join:2001-01-22
Brooklyn, NY

reply to Count Hogula$
Re: The MPAA has more of a beef

said by Count Hogula$ See Profile:
Unlike music CD's movies on DVD are IMHO worth the money.
Especially when you see the following picture at your local music/movie store:

"Harry Potter" DVD .......... $15
"Harry Potter" soundtrack ... $19
--
Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies...
BOYCOTT RIAA!!! VOTE SENATOR "FRITZ" HOLLINGS AND REPRESENTATIVE HOWARD BERMAN OUT OF CONGRESS!!!


SRFireside

join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX

reply to Count Hogula$
I have a prime example of that Hog. Just today I was at my local grocery store and I saw Monsters Inc. on sale for $14.99. This is for the special edition DVD mind you, not some featureless DVD or VHS product. $15 for a newly released DVD with all the goodies we love to get in DVD's. This was a major blockbuster in the theatres too. Not like the multitudes of Killer Klowns from Outer Space DVD's I see at Best Buy for $10 a pop.

What I can't fathom is how the record industry can continue to release audio CD's at prices just as high as Monsters Inc., a movie with video, audio, and extra features? The RIAA says the costs of the CD reflect the marketing overhead. BAH!! The Monsters Inc. DVD has had TV commercials run nationwide as well as huge displays in the stores and all that other promotional stuff and they aren't overcharging for their product. The only thing that is hurting the music industry is the industry leaders themselves. Start making CD's with extra features in them so people will WANT to buy them. Start selling CD's at about $10 or less and you will see unit sales go up, up, up.
--
Love Science Fiction? www.spacestationzoom.com


Count Hogula$
Notorious Dog
Premium
join:2002-06-19
Corona, CA

Because CD revenue is nearly the sole source of revenue for record labels. Monster's Inc. had a world wide box office showing, plus DVD rights (including rental rights), plus PPV rights, plus CATV rights plus off-air TV rights.

That's a lot of sources of income, versus CD's having some merchandising, tours and CD sales...that's pretty much it.
--
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. -Thomas Jefferson


Count Hogula$
Notorious Dog
Premium
join:2002-06-19
Corona, CA


reply to Pirate515
said by Pirate515 See Profile:
said by Count Hogula$ See Profile:
Unlike music CD's movies on DVD are IMHO worth the money.
Especially when you see the following picture at your local music/movie store:

"Harry Potter" DVD .......... $15
"Harry Potter" soundtrack ... $19

DeepdiscountCD has the HP&SS CD soundtrack for under $12 new including shipping. Most people complaining about CD prices don't shop...but even at $12...CD's are a rip compared to movies.

$19 is list for the CD like the DVD list is $27...but like DVDs, CDs can be had cheap with a little shopping effort.

What it does make you wonder is who is really making the money? Record labels...doesn't look like it. Retailers look like they're getting the discs for a steal then ripping people for them.

I would be interested in seeing what the wholesale prices are for new release CD's like Feminem.
--
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. -Thomas Jefferson

[text was edited by author 2002-09-23 15:51:10]


grunteled
Puffy And Prickly
Premium
join:2001-06-13
Kansas City, MO
clubs:

reply to wjwallace3
Re: I'll tell ya what makes me happy...

If you have nothing new to say, why post? We have all heard more times than is humane the various shoplifting, armed robbery, rape, murder, theft, and other legal analogies given to this issue. I don't need to hear it again. It's simply not a persuasive argument in the face of the legislation they want today.

I reject outright the notion that movies should be free and that you are entitled to steal them. I also reject outright the notion that we should have implants in our stereos, cars, palm pilots, TVs, cable boxes, mp3 players, speakers, cd drives, ears, eyes, and computers to protect their property. My computer is NOT a home entertainment device, and it angers me and many others when it is treated as one. They can, like all other property owners, attack the distributers of stolen property and leave the rest of us alone.

Please spare the world another shoplifting DVDs/CDs argument. Please.....

randysavage0

join:2002-04-16
Fayetteville, AR
reply to wjwallace3
Mr. wallace.... has anyone told you the difference between tangible property and intangible property?

Come post again when you shoplift a copyright.

luckylar

join:2002-01-29
Hixson, TN

reply to Count Hogula$
Re: The MPAA has more of a beef

said by Count Hogula$ See Profile:
Because CD revenue is nearly the sole source of revenue for record labels. Monster's Inc. had a world wide box office showing, plus DVD rights (including rental rights), plus PPV rights, plus CATV rights plus off-air TV rights.

That's a lot of sources of income, versus CD's having some merchandising, tours and CD sales...that's pretty much it.

Your point is made. BUT, how much was spent making the movie compared to the making of the CD?


Count Hogula$
Notorious Dog
Premium
join:2002-06-19
Corona, CA
Look at Mariah Carey...$40 million contract...most movies cost about $40M.


SRFireside

join:2001-01-19
Houston, TX

Monsters Inc.'s production budget was $115 million. A tad higher than Mariah Carey, and she is one of the rare exceptions in regards to production costs. Most albums have a pretty low production budget all things considered. I would say the cost to make an album would be less than one million dollars in regards to standard artist advances, engineering and studio time, mastering and glass master pressing, art design, etc. Plus you don't see television commercials all over the place for all of the label artists nor do you see the kind of advertising the film industry does. I believe these and other considerations should balance out the comparison between movie options and CD options.

cbs228
Geeks Of The World, Unite

join:2000-09-04
Saint Louis, MO

 fair use?

Our rights are meaningless if we are unable to exercise them.

"What good is a phone call if you are unable to speak?" (Agent Smith, The Matrix)
The DMCA makes our fair use rights irrelevant.

Consumers will not be satisfied until the media they buy performs to their expectations, not some Hollywood exec's expectations.

So here's what we want!
1. No more DRM or copy protection. Not only does it impede on our fair use rights, but dedicated pirates can and will hack, crack, or otherwise render ineffective any system anyone can devise. The idea that one cannot update old media to newer versions or protect media that one has rightfully purchased against accidental destruction is absolutely ludicrous.
2. No more unconstitutional laws! Please!
3. Fair Prices. Yes RIAA, I am talking to YOU.
4. Fair artist compensation. And don't call $0.85 out of $19.00 fair!
5. Public Domain. Copyright protection is meant to have limited terms and not unlimited terms. 75 years after the author's death is unreasonable when a patent only lasts 7. Will the next generation even know what public domain is?
6. Consumer Friendly Technology: Leave the technology research, development, and testing to the technology companies. Leave the media creation to the media companies. In doing so the growth of new, consumer friendly, technologies will be encouraged. And by consumer friendly I do not mean a player which will restrict how the user can view the media.

When this is done, the industry may flourish once again. Until then the situation will only worsen.
--
If you stare too long into the abyss the abyss stares back at you. -Nietzsche
Forums » Giving Valenti a Podiumpage: 1 · 2


Wednesday, 09-Dec 14:12:44 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF