
how-to block ads
|
|
view: topics flat text |
|
Comments on news posted 2004-09-16 18:20:16: Apparently the University of Texas, who caused quite a stir by deciding to ban all un-sanctioned hotspots on campus, quietly rescinded the decision. ..
|
 | | Cool Hey, the fcc is actually GOOD for something now... | |
|  dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA kudos:18 | Not worth the Brouhaha? Then why did he stir it up? DUH!  -- Nuke 'em all, let God sort 'em out. | |
|  | | Who said they are regulating the spectrum? They could just ban routers and AP's. Last time I checked, those were wern't classified as the "2.4GHz spectrum". Anyway... | |
|  |  | | Re: Who said they are regulating the spectrum? Who said they were regulating the spectrum? They did.
University of Texas was banning all wireless routers and access points, regardless of whose network they were part of. In short, they were creating a forbidden use of the 2.4GHz spectrum, or in other words, regulating it. | |
|
 | | PRIVATE dorm They could just ban routers and AP's. Last time I checked, those were wern't classified as the "2.4GHz spectrum". Anyway...
Remember this was a PRIVATE dorm, not owned by the University with PRIVATE DSL and Cable internet. Some of the people living inthe dorm are not even students. | |
|  |  | | Re: PRIVATE dorm Hmm, I didn't know that. In that case I am glad they stopped and I don't even see how they did it in the first place. I thought this was on campus with campus Internet. | |
|  |  PhoenixDown-- Wants FIOSPremium join:2003-06-08 Fresh Meadows, NY kudos:1 | If its off site then why do they care? -- Final Fantasy | |
|  |  |
 | | FCC Just protecting their right to charge enormously high prices for the licensed frequencies.
Some of you are thinking, WTF? If someone were allowed to regulate an unregulated frequency, that would reduce the interest in licensing. Because, If an ISP and a Realator were to Join forces they could tell enough people where to shove it, without paying for the license. | |
|  | | What debate? The cited FCC document specifically states that colleges and universities cannot prohibit the use of devices and antennas which are otherwise permitted by FCC rules. This is a rare case where an FCC ruling is actually crystal clear. I don't see how there can be any debate. | |
|  |  calvoiper join:2003-03-31 Belvedere Tiburon, CA | Re: What debate? Read closely the language at the bottom of page 2 of the PDF file.
"By their terms, these rules apply, among other things, to customer antennas - one meter or less in size - used for transmitting and/or receiving any fixed wireless signal of any commercial nonbroadcast communications signal that is transmitted via wireless technology to or from a customer location." (Emphasis added.) The "commercial" requirement is repeated in the next sentence as well. Additionally, it's not "to or from" a customer location--it's "within" a customer location.
If you're buying Internet access from a WISP, I think this language covers your connection point. If, however, you are just using your own Wi-Fi setup to connect with service you already have, it's not commercial communications because you aren't paying someone for the wireless service involved. (And before you start paying $1 to your neighbor and collecting 1$ from him, recall that commercial wireless service requires FCC approval....)
(For clarity, "broadcast" as used in these FCC rules means transmitted for intended reception by multiple users. A transmission for intended reception by a single receiver is a "nonbroadcast" transmission.)
Calvoiper -- VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies! | |
|
 exocet_cmYou delete it, I'll find itPremium join:2003-03-23 New Orleans, LA kudos:2 | Obsolutely... freakin funny!
"There's still some debate over whether or not a landlord owns the airwaves that traverse his property"
HAHA!!! I demand that you keep your airwaves away from my land! --
I know that God is real, but I don't think He created this vast universe just for us. Seti@Home & Seti@Boinc | |
|  |
 | |
|