Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Browser Speed Comparison
Search Topic:
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Comments on news posted 2005-02-12 12:34:25: Slashdot points to an independent browser speed comparison that compares CSS rendering, cold and warm starts, table rendering, script execution, as well as multiple image display times. The result? Opera is the fastest browser for Windows. ..

page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4
AuthorAll Replies


rms01

join:2004-12-01
Salem, OH
I agree...

I use all three, and I agree with the results overall. Opera is no question the fastest, but I think Firefox is much faster than IE...


Bobcat
Premium
join:2001-02-04
Bedminster, NJ
·Verizon Online DSL

Firefox and IE

Firefox and IE are similar?? Not according to that article. It states: "Internet Explorer on Windows was either as fast as - or faster than Mozilla and Firefox for most tasks, with the exception of scripts, where it took over twice as long" (emphasis added).

Perhaps your reporting is a little biased?

--
"I truly am not that concerned about him."
Pres. Bush on Osama bin Laden, March 13, 2002

DraconSlayer

join:2004-03-03
Schiller Park, IL
reply to rms01
FIREFOX!

FireFox rocks over them all!!!


dadkins
Can you do Blu?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
·Comcast

LOL!

"So overall, Opera seems to be the fastest browser for windows. Firefox is not faster than Internet Explorer, except for scripting, but for standards support, security and features, it is a better choice. However, it is still not as fast as Opera, and Opera also offers a high level of standards support, security and features."

Nuff said.
--
No Firefox here, move along!

cchhat01
The Guru

join:2001-05-01
Elmhurst, NY
opera is also not free like firefox.

nuff said


Chump
Support Bbr Rc5
Premium
join:2002-10-27
clubs:
there is a free version, yes it does have ads, but your statment is still false.
--
Join BBR RC5 Team!Click Here for deatils »DSLR RC5 FAQ


insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN
reply to dadkins
Yes but those browsers security rely on the fact that very few people use those browsers so that no one cares to try to exploit them.


GlassRail
Premium
join:2000-11-02
Retired
clubs:
·AT&T Southwest


1 edit
reply to DraconSlayer
Re: FIREFOX!

said by DraconSlayer See Profile:

FireFox rocks over them all!!!
FireFox cuts my upload speed in half Compared to IE
--
Git-R-Done

cooperaaaron

join:2004-04-10
Joliet, IL
Opera..

is the fastest, and I have used all three.. But, I still prefer Firefox... Opera does not work too well when using My Yahoo, under the SBC Yahoo DSL site ( my accounts are linked ) it does not work... If it did I would use it more.


alg
Just a shot away
Premium
join:2001-04-10
Houston, TX
clubs:
·Earthlink Cable Mo..

I'll stick with firefox

because I want to be able to use the same browser in both Windows and Linux.

To add to that, a browser that can be used in both that doesn't suck - such as the origianl Mozilla or Netscape.
--
Nobody's right if everybody's wrong.


dadkins
Can you do Blu?
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
·Comcast

reply to cchhat01
Re: LOL!

said by cchhat01 See Profile:

opera is also not free like firefox.

nuff said
I paid to support Opera, also to have the fastest secure browser.
--
No Firefox here, move along!


maximus_808
Proud Veteran
Premium
join:2001-08-27
Green Cove Springs, FL
clubs:
I allways thought...

That Opera 8.0b1 was faster than 7.54 I just didn't realise how much.

Zuralin

join:2001-08-09
Buffalo, NY

reply to alg
Re: I'll stick with firefox

said by alg See Profile:

because I want to be able to use the same browser in both Windows and Linux.
Because Opera is win32 only right??? Oh wait...


alg
Just a shot away
Premium
join:2001-04-10
Houston, TX
clubs:
·Earthlink Cable Mo..

said by Zuralin See Profile:

said by alg See Profile:


because I want to be able to use the same browser in both Windows and Linux.
Because Opera is win32 only right??? Oh wait...
I forgot to add it to the "that doesn't suck list"
--
Nobody's right if everybody's wrong.


F14b0mbk4t
Walmart Is 73h L337 Yo'
Premium
join:2004-11-11
Above
Opera...

The G-Mail page doesn't display correctly with Opera, Opera have alot of nice features and all but there are WAY too many controls.
--
BBr has too many MVM wannabes!

DarnellP

join:2004-10-12
Las Vegas, NV
I'm an oddball

I like Safari...

lawrence171
Evilly Yours - Evilness

join:2001-12-24
Canada

reply to dadkins
Re: LOL!

said by dadkins See Profile:

said by cchhat01 See Profile:

opera is also not free like firefox.

nuff said
I paid to support Opera, also to have the fastest secure browser.
Note that Opera refuses to find a solution to the IDS exploits/scam.
--
What I used to be I no longer am... God, why can't you freeze time for my sake?

Zuralin

join:2001-08-09
Buffalo, NY
reply to alg
Re: I'll stick with firefox

way to go on contradicting yourself.. and if you use firefox ONLY because it can be used in both win32 and linux you are dumb


djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable


2 edits
reply to rms01
Re: I agree...

The thing that kills me about Firefox "speed", and is correctly identified in this nice article, is the cold start time. On the windows box, it took Firefox over twenty seconds to load the first time, vs. only 7 seconds for internet explorer.

I rarely notice rendering and script execution speed issues. I notice the load times more than anything else.

It does not surprise me at all that Opera is the speed demon of the group. It was extremely apparent how efficient their engine was a few years back when I was working with PDAs. Pocket IE on a Pocket PC was so slow, it was practically nearly useless with most real web pages, where Opera was able to render pages quite nicely on the Zaurus, despite it being a slower PDA. Unfortnately there aren't enough advantages and too many compatibility disadvantages for me to use it for my desktop.

At least the web standards are finally making it possible to create decent pages that work on all the browers. The popularity of third party browsers on a Windows is a great thing towards making the internet as a whole browser agnostic. It was a nightmare making nice sites that were compatible with IE 4 and Netscape 4.
quote:
FireFox cuts my upload speed in half Compared to IE
Are you referring to the Java BBR speed tests? That's not really a browser issue but a Java JVM issue. You are probably using the Microsoft JVM under IE, which I have also noticed results in better speed tests. But, those are just tests. It's extremely rare in real everyday use that you would be uploading something using a java applet as the speed tests do.
--
\\ROB - a part of the SCB local network


SpitefulCrow
Insert Witty Tag Here
Premium
join:2003-06-04
Berkeley, CA

reply to dadkins
Re: LOL!

Does Opera support third-party extensions to the browser?
I don't think so.
My Firefox installation (on a source-based Linux distribution (Gentoo), by the way, so installing an outdated ad-ridden binary-only browser is not something I want to do) has a whole bunch of useful and cool Extensions installed, like Sage, a lightweight RSS aggregator sidebar. Let's see a closed-source browser support things like that without having to write them into the main program itself.
--
Powered by Optimum Online
Please do not feed the trolls.
Computer specs:Athlon XP 2600+/1GB DDR333/120GB 7200RPM SATA/GeForce FX5500 256MB AGP8x + IBM T86a LCD 1280x1024x24@60/Marvell Yukon GigE/Onboard VT880 6.1-channel sound
Forums » Browser Speed Comparisonpage: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4


Friday, 27-Nov 11:42:31 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF